This article investigates employment and occupational transitions that are behind structural changes in European labour markets before, during and after the Great Recession. The study introduces a new methodological approach for studying labour market flows considering the quality of the jobs from and into which the flows are taking place by differentiating them into wage quintiles. The analysis compares six European countries that are usually associated with different institutional clusters – France, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK. It tracks the transitions of their working age populations into and out of inactivity, unemployment and employment (in five wage categories). The findings show the extent to which employment and occupational mobility patterns differ across European countries, resulting in very different outcomes in terms of employment opportunities and life chances. Results also suggest that the countries studied fall into three distinct categories based on the degree of occupational mobility characterising their economies.
AnxoDNiklassonH (2009) The Swedish model: Revival after the turbulent 1990s? In: BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–104.
2.
BachmannRBecharaPKramerARzepkaS (2015) Labour market dynamics and worker heterogeneity during the Great Recession – Evidence from Europe. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies4(19): 1–29.
3.
BaroneCLucchiniMSchizzerottoA (2011) Career mobility in Italy: A growth curves analysis of occupational attainment in the twentieth century. European Societies13(3): 377–400.
4.
BazzoliMMarzadroSSchizzerottoATrivellatoU. (2018) Come sono cambiate le storie lavorative dei giovani negli ultimi quarant’anni? Evidenze da uno studio Pilota. Stato e Mercato114(3): 369–418.
5.
BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (2009) European employment models in flux: Pressures for change and prospects for survival and revitalization. In: BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–56.
6.
BukodiERóbertP (2007) Occupational Mobility in Europe. Report for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
7.
CortesGM (2016) Where have the middle-wage workers gone? A study of polarization using panel data. Journal of Labor Economics34(1): 63–105.
8.
CrouchC (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
DevereuxPJ (2002) Occupation upgrading and the business cycle. Labour16(3): 423–452.
10.
DTI (Danish Technological Institute) (2008) Job Mobility in the European Union: Optimising its Social and Economic Benefits. Report for the European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels.
11.
EngelMSchaffnerS (2012), How to Use the EU-SILC Panel to Analyse Monthly and Hourly Wages. Ruhr Economic Papers No. 390, December. Bochum: Ruhr University Bochum.
12.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Eurofound (2017a) Occupational Change and Wage Inequality: European Jobs Monitor 2017. Report, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
14.
Eurofound (2017b) Employment Transitions and Occupational Mobility in Europe: The Impact of the Great Recession. Report, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fernández-MacíasEArranz-MuñozJM (2019) Occupations and the recent trends in wage inequality in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print July 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0959680119866041.
18.
Fernández-MacíasEHurleyJ (2017) Routine-biased technical change and job polarization in Europe. Socio-Economic Review15(3): 563–585.
19.
HallP ASoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundation of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LonghiSTaylorM (2013) Occupational change and mobility among employed and unemployed job seekers. Scottish Journal of Political Economy60(1): 71–100.
22.
López-AndreuMRuberyJ (2018) Austerity and women’s employment trajectories in Spain and the UK: A comparison of two flexible labour markets. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 22 March 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18760988.
23.
MolinaORhodesM (2007) The political economy of adjustment in mixed market economies: A study of Spain and Italy. In: HanckéBRhodesMThatcherM (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–252.
24.
MurphyEOeschD (2018) Is employment polarisation inevitable? Occupational change in Ireland and Switzerland, 1970–2010. Work, Employment and Society32(6): 1099–1117.
25.
MykhnenkoV (2007) Strengths and weaknesses of ‘weak’ coordination: Economic institutions, revealed comparative advantages, and socio-economic performance of mixed market economies in Poland and Ukraine. In: HanckéBRhodesMThatcherM (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351–378.
26.
NolanBVoitchovskyS (2016) Job loss by wage level: Lessons from the Great Recession in Ireland. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies5(7): 1–29.
27.
OeschD (2013) Occupational Change in Europe: How Technology and Education Transform the Job Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
OeschDPiccittoG (2019) The polarization myth: Occupational upgrading in Germany, Spain, Sweden and the UK, 1992–2015. Work and Occupations46(4): 441–469.
29.
RecchiEBaldoniEFrancavillaFMencariniL (2006) Geographical and Job Mobility in the EU. Report for the European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels.
30.
RuberyJGrimshawDDonnellyRUrwinP (2009) Revisiting the UK model: From basket case to success story and back again? In: BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–80.
31.
SchererS (2004) Stepping-stones or traps? The consequences of labour market entry positions on future careers in West Germany, Great Britain and Italy. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 369–394.
32.
SchmidtVA (2003) French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society32(4): 526–554.
33.
TeulingsCN (1993) The diverging effects of the business cycle on the expected duration of job search. Oxford Economic Papers45(1): 482–500.
34.
TheodossiouIZangelidisA (2009) ‘Should I stay or should I go?’ The effect of gender, education and unemployment on labour market transitions. Labour Economics16(5): 566–577.
35.
Vacas-SorianoCFernández-MacíasEde BustilloRM (2019) Recent trends in wage inequality from an EU perspective: a tale of two convergences. Empiric. Epub ahead of print 12 March 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-019-09436-7.
36.
WrightEODwyerR (2003) The patterns of job expansions in the United States: A comparison of the 1960s and 1990s. Socio-Economic Review1(3): 289–325.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
