Key EU agencies have successfully urged member states to scale back employment protection legislation as a solution to unemployment. The economic arguments for this reform are mixed, with recent empirical evidence largely unsupportive. Critics have also raised doubts about the accuracy of the OECD’s Employment Protection Legislation Index, which is the principal method EU agencies use to target so-called high-protection regimes. This article supplements existing criticisms of the OECD index by arguing that it fails to account for procedural requirements in assessing the difficulties and costs of carrying out individual dismissals. Evidence from New Zealand, ostensibly a low-protection country, demonstrates procedural requirements can pose the main impediments to carrying out individual dismissals. This suggests the need for revision of the OECD Employment Protection Legislation Index or the use of other indices instead.
AcharyaVBaghaiRSubramarianK (2010) Labor Laws and Innovation. Working Paper No. 16484. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
AcharyaVBaghaiRSubramarianK (2013) Labor laws and innovation. Journal of Law and Economics56(4): 997–1037.
3.
AdamsZBishopLDeakinS (2016) CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research, Cambridge University.
4.
AndersonGNuttallP (2014) The good-faith obligation: An effective model for promoting voice? In: BoggANovitzT (eds) Voices at Work: Continuity and Change in the Common Law World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 194–213.
AvdagicS (2015) Does deregulation work? Reassessing the unemployment effects of employment protection. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(1): 6–26.
7.
AvdagicSSalardiP (2013) Tenuous link: Labour market institutions and unemployment in advanced and new market economies. Socio-Economic Review11(4): 739–769.
8.
BeckKKynastonH (2014) Remedies – We’ve been thinking…’. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Law Society 10th Employment Law Conference. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 441–472.
9.
BoeriTJimenoJF (2005) The effects of employment protection: Learning from variable enforcement. European Economic Review49(8): 2057–2077.
10.
BoeriTvan OursJ (2008) The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
BertolaGBoeriTCazesS (2000) Employment protection in industrialized countries: The case for new indicators. International Labour Review139(1): 57–72.
12.
BetchermanG (2012) Labor Market Institutions: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: World Banks.
13.
BlumenfeldSRyallSKielyP (2013) Employment Agreements Update 2012/13. Wellington: Industrial Relations Centre, Victoria University.
14.
BoteroJDjankovSLa PortaR, et al. (2004) The regulation of labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1339–1382.
15.
ClauwaertSSchömannI (2012) The Crisis and National Labour Law Reforms: A Mapping Exercise. Working Paper 2012.04. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
16.
ClearyTMacKinnonD (2008) Restructuring, redundancy, selling or shrinking. In: Employment Law. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 331–351.
17.
CountourisNFreedlandM (2013) Labour regulation and the economic crisis in Europe: Challenges, responses and prospects. In: HeyesJRychlyL (eds) Labour Administration in Uncertain Times: Policy, Practice and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar/ILO, pp. 66–94.
18.
CranneyPKynastonH (2012) Redundancy – A critique of the law past and present, and a guide for the future. In: Employment Law Conference. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 77–92.
19.
DegryseCJepsenMPochetP (2013) The Euro Crisis and its Impact on National and European Social Policies. Working Paper 2013.05. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
20.
DoL (2010) Review of the Employment Relations Act 2000: Part 9 Personal Grievances, Summary of Submissions. Wellington: Department of Labour, New Zealand Government.
21.
DrahokoupilJMyantM (2015) Labour’s legal resources after 2004: The role of the European Union. Transfer21(3): 327–341.
22.
ElmeskovJMartinJPScarpettaS (1998) Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries’ experiences. Swedish Economic Policy Review5: 205–252.
23.
European Commission (2012) Labour Market Developments in Europe 2012. European Economy 5/2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
24.
European Commission (2016) Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2015. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
25.
GiotisGChletsosM (2015) The Impact of Employment Protection Legislation on Unemployment in OECD Countries: A Meta-Analysis. Prague: MAER-Net Colloquium.
26.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HarcourtMWoodG (2007) The importance of employment protection for skill development in coordinated market economies. European Journal of Industrial Relations13(2): 141–159.
28.
HarcourtMHannayMLamH (2013) Employment-at-will versus just-cause dismissal: Applying the due process model of procedural justice. Labor Law Journal64(2): 67–85.
29.
HarcourtMWoodGRoperI (2007) The importance of legislated employment protection for worker commitment in coordinated market economies. Journal of Economic Issues41(4): 961–980.
30.
HeyesJLewisP (2015) Relied upon for the heavy lifting: Can employment legislation reforms lead the EU out of the jobs crisis?Industrial Relations Journal46(2): 81–99.
31.
IchinoAIchinoPPoloM (1998) Il mercato del lavoro e le decisioni dei giudici sui licenziamenti. In: CasseseSGalliG (eds) L’Italia da semplificare. I. Le istituzioni. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 459–492.
32.
InglisCCaisleyA (2012) Section 103A – The impact of reinstating ‘could’. In: Employment Law Conference – Good Faith. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 5–19.
33.
IssacharoffS (1996) Contracting for employment: The limited return of the common law. Texas Law Review74: 1783–1812.
LazearE (1990) Job security provisions and employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics105(3): 699–726.
36.
LindbeckASnowerD (1990) Demand and supply-side policies and unemployment: Policy implications of the insider-outsider approach. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics92(2): 279–305.
37.
KamiatW (1996) Labor and lemons: Efficient norms in the internal labor market and the possible failures of individual contracting. University of Pennsylvania Law Review144: 1953–1970.
38.
KuceraDSariD (2018) New labour rights indicators: Method and trends for 2000–2015. International Labour Review158(3): 419–446.
39.
MacKinnonDSkeltonP (2014) Redundancy – Section 103A good faith and the legal advice we give. In: 10th Employment Law Conference. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 13–33.
40.
MaitlandM (2010) The common European flexicurity principles: How a fragile consensus was reached. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(3): 1–16.
41.
MaleszykP (2016) Pros and cons of the OECD EPL Index: Measuring employment protection legislation in Poland. Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe (Special Issue: Re-thinking the OECD’s Role in Global Governance: Members, Policies, Influence) 14(4): 129–149.
42.
MeardiG (2014) Italian and Spanish employment reforms in the Great Recession. In: HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) Comparative Political Economy of Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 332–350.
43.
MyantMBrandhuberL (2016) The OECD’s Employment Protection Index: Its Strengths and Weaknesses, Uses and Abuses. Working Paper 2016.11. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
44.
MyantMBrandhuberL (2017) Uses and abuses of the OECD’s Employment Protection Legislation index in research and EU policy making. In: PiasnaAMyantM (eds) Myths of Employment Deregulation: How it Neither Creates Jobs nor Reduces Labour Market Segmentation. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, pp. 23–42.
45.
NicolettiGScarpettaSBoylaudO (2000) Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an Extension to Employment Protection Legislation. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 226. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
46.
OECD (2013) Employment Outlook 2013. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
47.
RiphahnR (2004) Employment protection and effort among German employees. Economic Letters85: 353–357.
48.
RooneyJWhiteH (2010) Restructuring – Key issues. In: Employment Law Conference. Wellington: NZLS CLE Limited, pp. 33–43.
49.
RutherfordTFrangiL (2018) Overturning Italy’s article 18: Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state. Economic and Industrial Democracy39(3): 439–457.
50.
ScarpettaS (1996) Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies26(1): 43–98.
51.
SchömannI (2014) Labour Law Reforms in Europe: Adjusting Employment Protection Legislation for the Worse. Working Paper 2014.02. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
52.
SchwabS (1993) Life-cycle justice: Accommodating just cause and employment at will. Michigan Law Review92(8): 8–62.
53.
SiebertH (1997) Labour market rigidities: At the root of unemployment in Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3): 37–55.
54.
St. PaulG (2004) Why are European countries diverging in their unemployment experience?Journal of Economic Perspectives18(4): 49–68.
55.
SuedekumJRuehmannP (2003) Severance payments and firm-specific human capital. Labour17(1): 47–62.
56.
VennD (2009) Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators. Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 89. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
57.
WilsonA (2018) Scotland – The New Case for Optimism: A Strategy for Inter-generational Economic Renaissance. Edinburgh: SNP.
