Poland has had the highest incidence of temporary employment among the EU countries since 2009. However, due to a lack of proper data, only a few empirical studies have been devoted to analyse the consequences of temporary employment for future career and economic prospects on the Polish labour market. In this study the data from the Social Diagnosis panel study for the years 2009–2013 are used in order to analyse these consequences. The results reveal that although the chances for the temporary employed of finding a permanent job increase and the risk of being unemployed decreases over time, the negative consequences of temporary employment for income and its perceived stability do not seem to diminish.
BaranowskaAGebelM (2010) The determinants of youth temporary employment in the enlarged Europe: Do labour market institutions matter?European Societies12(3): 367–390.
2.
BaranowskaALewandowskiP (2008) Adaptability to economic changes. In: BukowskiM (ed.) Employment in Poland 2007: Security on a Flexible Labour Market. Warsaw: Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, pp. 37–70.
3.
BaranowskaAGebelMKotowskaIE (2011) The role of fixed-term contracts at labour market entry in Poland: Stepping stones, screening devices, traps or search subsidies?Work, Employment and Society25(4): 777–793.
4.
BoothALFrancesconiMFrankJ (2002) Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends?The Economic Journal112(480): 189–213.
5.
ChengTMaunoSLeeC (2014) The buffering effect of coping strategies in the relationship between job insecurity and employee well-being. Economic and Industrial Democracy35(1): 71–94.
6.
Council for Social Monitoring (2013) Social Diagnosis 2000–2013: integrated database. Available at: www.diagnoza.com.
7.
De CuyperNNotelaersGDe WitteH (2009) Transitioning between temporary and permanent employment: A two-wave study on the entrapment, the stepping stone and the selection hypothesis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology82(1): 67–88.
8.
De LangeMGesthuizenMWolbersM (2014) Consequences of flexible employment at labour market entry for early career development in the Netherlands. Economic and Industrial Democracy35(3): 413–434.
9.
DoladoJJGarcía-SerranoCJimenoJF (2002) Drawing lessons from the boom of temporary jobs in Spain. The Economic Journal112(480): 270–295.
10.
EichhorstWMarxP (2011) Reforming German labour market institutions: A dual path to flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy21(1): 73–87.
11.
European Commission (2014) Eurostat. Employment and unemployment (LFS). Available at: ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
12.
García-PérezJIMuñoz-BullónF (2011) Transitions into permanent employment in Spain: An empirical analysis for young workers. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(1): 103–143.
13.
GebelM (2013) Is a temporary job better than unemployment? A cross-country comparison based on British, German, and Swiss panel data. SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 543.
14.
GrotkowskaGSochaMWSztanderskaU (2007) Poland. In: CazesSNesporovaA (eds) Flexicurity: A Relevant Approach in Central and Eastern Europe. Geneva: International Labour Office, pp. 181–212.
15.
GüntherS (2010) Non-standard employment and labour force participation: A comparative view of the recent development in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper 5087.
16.
InghamHInghamM (2011) Job creation and labour market flexibility: Miracle or mirage on the Polish labour market?Industrial Relations Journal42(4): 339–357.
17.
InghamHInghamM (2014) Towards eurosclerosis: Will Poland escape?The World Economy37(2): 290–310.
18.
KahnLM (2007) The impact of employment protection mandates on demographic temporary employment patterns: International microeconomic evidence. The Economic Journal117(521): 333–356.
19.
KuvaasBDysvikA (2011) Permanent employee investment and social exchange and psychological cooperative climate among temporary employees. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(2): 261–283.
20.
LozzaELibreriCBosioAC (2013) Temporary employment, job insecurity and their extraorganizational outcomes. Economic and Industrial Democracy34(1): 89–105.
21.
MaunoSDe CuyperNKinnunenUDe WitteH (2012) Work characteristics in long-term temporary workers and temporary-to-permanent workers: A prospective study among Finnish health care personnel. Economic and Industrial Democracy33(3): 357–377.
22.
MrozowickiATrawińskaM (2013) Women’s union activism and trade union revitalization: The Polish experience. Economic and Industrial Democracy34(2): 269–289.
23.
NunziataLStaffolaniS (2007) Short-term contracts regulations and dynamic labour demand: Theory and evidence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy54(1): 72–104.
24.
OECD (2014) OECD.StatExtracts. Available at: stats.oecd.org/.
25.
PolaviejaJG (2006) The incidence of temporary employment in advanced economies: Why is Spain different?European Sociological Review22(1): 61–78.
26.
SchmidG (2002) Towards a theory of transitional labour markets. In: SchmidGGazierB (eds) The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration Through Transitional Labour Markets. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 151–195.
27.
SilvaJIVázquez-GrennoJ (2013) The ins and outs of unemployment in a two-tier labor market. Labour Economics24: 161–169.
28.
SpenceM (1973) Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics87(3): 355–374.
29.
Van LanckerW (2012) The European world of temporary employment: Gendered and poor?European Societies14(1): 83–111.
30.
VisserJ (2013) ICTWSS: Database on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007, Version 4. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies. Available at: www.uva-aias.net/208.
