Pension trusteeship and diversity in the UK: A new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?

Abstract

Drawing on interviews, this article investigates change and continuity induced by greater diversity among pension trustees in terms of trustees’ involvement in boardroom activities in the UK. Utilizing Bourdieu’s theory of habitus, the authors demonstrate the agency of trustees, and how greater diversity among trustees changes the boardroom decision-making process. However, the authors also reveal forms of continuity by reproduction of educational, corporate and social values within a boardroom context. The findings challenge the assumption that greater diversity may radically transform organizations.

Keywords

Boardroom diversity habitus pension trusteeship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Ferreira

(2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94(2) 291–309.

Blake

(2003) The UK pension system: Key issues. Pensions: An International Journal 8: 4330–4364.

Bourdieu

(1985) The genesis of the concepts of habitus and field. Sociocriticism 2: 11–24.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood.

Bourdieu

(1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu

(2001) Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

JDL

(1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bridge

(2004) Pierre Bourdieu. In: Hubbard

Kitchin

Valentine

(eds) Key Thinkers on Space and Place. London: Sage, pp. 59–65.

Bradley

(2007) Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Carter

Simkins

Simpson

(2003) Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review 38: 33–53.

11.

Carver

(2002) On Board Leadership. New York: John Wiley.

12.

Clark

(2007) Governing finance: Reconciling functional imperatives with stakeholder representation in financial institutions. In: Governing Finance Conference, Beijing, June.

13.

Clegg

Stewart

Courpasson

Phillips

(2006) Power and Organizations. London: Sage.

14.

Corsun

Costen

(2001) Is the glass ceiling unbreakable? Habitus, fields and the stalling of women and minorities in management. Journal of Management Inquiry 10(1): 16–25.

15.

Davies Report (2011) Women on Boards. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. Available at: www.gov.uk.

16.

Elder-Vass

(2007) Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action. Sociological Theory 25(4): 325–346.

17.

Erhardt

Werbel

Shrader

(2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance 11: 102–111.

18.

Gribben

Gitsham

(2006) Will UK pension funds become more responsible? Ashridge Business School.

19.

Halford

Leonard

(2001) Gender Power and Organisations. London: Sage.

20.

Hymans Robertson (2007) Trustees: Increasingly powerful. Survey. Available at: www.Hymans.co.uk.

21.

Jenkins

(1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

22.

Kakabadse

(2005) Prudence vs professionalism: Exploratory examination of pension trustee capability. Personnel Review 34(5): 567–587.

23.

Kakabadse

Kouzmin

(2003) Pension fund trustees: Role and contribution. European Management Journal 21(3): 376–386.

24.

Kandola

Fullerton

(1994) Managing the Mosaic: Diversity in Action. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

25.

Kerfoot

Knights

(1998) Managing masculinity in contemporary organizational life: A ‘man’agerial project. Organization 5(1): 7–26.

26.

Lovell

(2000) Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu. Feminist Theory 1(1): 11–32.

27.

McKinsey (2007) Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. Report. Available at: www.mckinsey.com.

28.

McNay

(1999) Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 95–117.

29.

McPhail

(2010) Board diversity, the logic of difference and the logic of equivalence: A critical study of the emergence of corporate democracy. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review 13(1): 125–144.

30.

Maclean

Harvey

Chia

(2010) Dominant corporate agents and the power elite in France and Britain. Organization Studies 31(3): 327–348.

31.

Mayrhofer

Iellatchitch

Meyer

. (2004) Going beyond the individual. Journal of Management Development 23(9): 870–884.

32.

Malleson

( 2003) Justifying gender equality on the bench: Why difference won’t do. Feminist Legal Studies 11: 1–24.

33.

Mellish

(2006) Trustee woes: Harassed trustees in the spotlight. Pension Management, 1 July, 1–4.

34.

Morrison

(2005) Structuration theory, habitus and complexity theory: Elective affinities or old wine in new bottles. British Journal of Sociology of Education 26(3): 311–326.

35.

Mutch

(2003) Communities of practice and habitus: A critique. Organization Studies 24: 383–401.

36.

Nielson

Huse

(2010) Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review 7: 16–29.

37.

Özbilgin

Tatli

(2005) Understanding Bourdieu’s contribution to organization and management studies. Academy of Management Review 30(4): 855–869.

38.

Özbilgin

Tatli

(2011) Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations 64(9): 1229–1253.

39.

Pettigrew

McNulty

(1998) Sources and uses of power in the boardroom. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 7(2): 197–214.

40.

Rafferty

Ham

Bryan

(2008) Governance and performance in superannuation fund management: An issues and research design article. Report to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees.

41.

Ragins

(1995) Diversity, power, and mentorship in organizations: A cultural, structural, and behavioral perspective. In: Chemers

Oskamp

Costanzo

(eds) Diversity in Organizations: New Perspectives for a Changing Workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

42.

Robbins

(2005) The origins, early development and status of Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital. The British Journal of Sociology 56(1): 13–30.

43.

Roberson

(2006) Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group and Organization Management 31: 212–236.

44.

Rose

(2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance 15(2): 404–413.

45.

Sayce

(2006) Gender change? Locked into industrial relations and Bourdieu. Employee Relations 28(5): 468–482.

46.

Sayce

(2012) Being a female pension trustee. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Journal 31(3): 1–16.

47.

Scott

(2008) Modes of power and the re-conceptualisation of elites. The Sociological Review 56: 25–43.

48.

Swartz

( 1997) Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

49.

Sweetman

(2003) ‘Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus. The Sociological Review 51(4): 528–549.

50.

Tatli

Özbilgin

(2009) Understanding diversity managers’ role in organizational change: Towards a conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 26: 244–258.

51.

Tatli

Özbilgin

(2012a) Surprising intersectionalities of inequality and privilege: The case of the arts and cultural sector. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31(3): 249–265.

52.

Tatli

Özbilgin

(2012b) An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: A Bourdieuan framing. International Journal of Management Reviews 14(2): 180–200.

53.

Van der Walt

Ingley

(2003) Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review 11: 218–234.

54.

Vinnicombe

Singh

Burke

. (2008). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

55.

Weststar

Verma

(2007) What makes for effective labor representation on pension boards? Labour Studies Journal, 32:4 382–410.