Searching for flexible and competitive remuneration, financial participation has come
into focus for both practitioners and scientists. The question of determinants and
outcomes of financial participation schemes has been of special interest. Although
many excellent studies have been conducted recently, further theory-based and
empirically tested research would enrich our understanding of financial
participation. Taking the examples of three European countries, namely Great
Britain, France and Germany, we examine the explanatory power of neoinstitutionalist
arguments in discussing financial participation. The hypotheses generated are tested
empirically based on the data of the Cranfield Network on International Strategic
Human Resource Management (Cranet).
Burt, R. S.
(1987)
‘Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence’
, American Journal of Sociology92:
1287-1335
.
2.
CEC (1996) PEPPER II - Die Förderung der Gewinn-und
Betriebsergebnisbeteiligung (einschlielich) Kapitalbeteiligung der Arbeitnehmer in
den Mitgliedstaaten. Luxembourg: Amt fur amtl. Veroffentlichungen der Europ. Gemeinschaft.
3.
Cox, D. R.
and
N. Wermuth
(1993)
‘Linear Dependencies Represented by Chain Graphs’
, Statistical Science8:
204-218
.
4.
DiMaggio, P. J.
and
W. W. Powell
(1991) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional
Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational
Fields’, pp. 63-82 in
W. W. Powell
and
P. J. DiMaggio
(eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
5.
Festing, M.
,
Y. Groening
,
R. Kabst
and
W. Weber
(1999)
‘Financial Participation in Europe: Determinants and Outcomes’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy20(2):
295-329
.
6.
Gerlach, K.
and
O. Hubler
(1994) ‘Gewinnbeteiligung in Europa: Empirische
Ergebnisse, institutionelle Besonderheiten und mogliche
Harmonisierungstendenzen’, pp. 365-401 in
B. Gahlen
,
H. Hesse
and
H. J. Ramser
(eds) Europäische Integrationsprobleme aus
wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht.
Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr
.
7.
Gerlach, K.
and
K. Lehmann
(1999)
‘Gewinnbeteiligung in Europa’
, Mitbestimmung1-2:
42-45
.
8.
Gooderham, P. N.
,
O. Nordhaug
and
K. Ringdal
(1998)
‘When in Rome, Do They Do as the Romans? HRM Practices of US
Subsidiaries in Europe’
, Management International Review38:
47-64
.
9.
Gooderham, P. H.
,
O. Nordhaug
and
K. Ringdal
(1999)
‘Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational
Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms’
, Administrative Science Quarterly44:
507-531
.
10.
Hardes, H.-D.
and
H. Wickert
(2000)
‘Erfolgsabhangige Beteiligungsentgelte in vergleichender
europaischer Perspektive: Empirische Befunde und Erklarungs-ansatze’
, Zeitschrift für Personalforschung1:
52-77
.
11.
Hyman, J.
(2000) ‘Financial Participation
Schemes’, pp. 178-195 in
G. White
and
J. Drucker
(eds) Reward Management: A Critical Text.
London: Routledge
.
12.
Jackson, S. E.
and
R. S. Schuler
(1995)
‘Understanding Human Resource Management in the Context of
Organizations and their Environments’
, Annual Review of Psychology46:
237-264
.
13.
Kruse, D.
(1996)
‘Why Do Firms Adopt Profit Sharing and Employee Ownership Plans?’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations34:
515-538
.
14.
Lauritzen, S. L.
and
N. Wermuth
(1989)
‘Graphical Models for Associations between Variables, Some of
Which are Qualitative and Some Quantitative’
, Annals of Statistics17:
31-57
.
15.
Mayrhofer, W. (1998) ‘Umwelt - welche Umwelt?’, pp. 291-3
in A. Martin and W. Nienhuser (eds) Personalpolitik: Wissenschaftliche
Erklärung der Personal-praxis. Munich: Hampp.
16.
Meyer, J. W.
(1994) ‘Rationalized
Environments’, pp. 28-54 in
W. R. Scott
and
J. W. Meyer
(eds) Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural
Complexity and Individualism.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
17.
Meyer, J. W.
and
B. Rowan
(1977)
‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’
, American Journal of Sociology83:
340-363
.
18.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)
(1995) ‘Profit Sharing in OECD
Countries’, OECD Employment Outlook July 1995.
Paris: OECD
.
19.
Pendleton, A.
,
E. Poutsma
,
J. V. Ommeren
and
C. Brewster
(2003)
‘The Incidence and Determinants of Employee Share Ownership and
Profit Sharing in Europe’
, The Determinants of the Incidence and the Effects of Participatory Organizations7:
141-172
.
20.
Poutsma, E.
(2001)
‘Financial Participation and HRM in Europe’
, paper presented at HRM Network Conference,
Nijmegen, 15 November.
21.
Poutsma, E.
,
W. de Nijs
and
H. Doorewaard
(1999)
‘Promotion of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing in Europe’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy20:
171-196
.
22.
Poutsma, E.
,
J. Hendrickx
and
F. Huijgen
(2003)
‘Employee Participation in Europe: In Search of the Participative Workplace’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy24(1):
45-76
.
23.
Scott, W. R.
(1987)
‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’
, Administrative Science Quarterly32:
493-511
.
24.
Scott, W. R.
(1992) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open
Systems.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
.
25.
Scott, W. R.
and
J. W. Meyer
(1992) ‘The Organization of Societal
Sectors’, pp. 129-153 in
J. W. Meyer
and
R. W. Scott
(eds) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
26.
Sesil, J.
,
D. Kruse
and
J. Blasi
(2001) Sharing Ownership via Employee Stock Ownership,
Discussion Paper No. 25/2001.
Helsinki: World Institute for Development
Economics Research (WIDER)
.
27.
Sesil, J.
,
M. Kroumouva
,
J. Blasi
and
D. Kruse
(2002)
‘Broad-Based Employee Stock Options in US New Economy Firms’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations40(2):
273-294
.
28.
Traxler, F.
(1999)
‘The State in Industrial Relations: A Cross-National Analysis of
Developments and Socioeconomic Effects’
, European Journal of Political Research36:
55-85
.
29.
Uvalic, M.
(1991) ‘PEPPER Report. Promotion of Employee
Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results’, Social Europe
3/91.
Brussels: Commission of the European Communities
.
30.
Vaughan-Whitehead, D.
(1995) Workers’ Financial Participation: East-West
Experiences, ILO Labour Management Series No. 80.
Geneva: International Labour Office
.
31.
Walgenbach, P. (1998) ‘Personalpolitik aus der Perspektive des
Institutionalistischen Ansatzes’, pp. 267-90 in A. Martin and W. Nienhuser
(eds) Personalpolitik: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung der Personalpraxis.
Munich: Hampp.
32.
Zucker, L. G.
(1987)
‘Institutional Theories of Organizations’
, Annual Review of Sociology13:
443-464
.
