In exploring why and to what extent the Japanese model of participatory employment
relations has changed at the turn of the century, this article criticizes prevalent
paradigms of political economy, specifically the paradigms of the neoliberals and
the institutionalists, instead proposing a theoretical alternative, that of
agents’ refiexivity in international competition. Contrary to the
institutionalist arguments for the path-dependent persistence of a national model,
the concepts of lifetime employment and seniority in Japan have changed from being
sources of competitiveness to objects and conditions for reform. Additionally, in
contrast to the neoliberals’ expectations based on the universal relevance
of liberal markets, the Japanese adjustments do not converge towards the American
liberal market model, but instead generate new divergences inspired but not
determined by foreign competitors.
Adler, P.S.
,
B. Goldoftas
and
D. Levine
(1999)
‘Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers
in the Toyota Production System’
, Organization Science10(1):
43–68
.
2.
Apfelthaler, G.
,
H.J. Muller
and
R.R. Rehder
(2002)
‘Corporate Global Culture as Competitive Advantage: Learning from
Germany and Japan in Alabama and Austria?’
, Journal of World Business37:
108–118
.
3.
Chesbrough, H.W.
(1998) ‘The Differing Impact of Technological
Change upon Incumbent Firms: A Comparative Theory of Organizational Constraints
and National Institutional Factors’, Working Paper,
Harvard Business School
.
4.
Cohen, J.
,
W. Dickens
and
A. Posen
(2001) ‘Changing Human Resource Management
Practices in US Manufacturing and the Decline in the NAIRU’,
in
A. Krueger
and
R. Solow
(eds) Sustainable Employment.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation
.
5.
Coriat, B.
,
P. Geoffron
and
M. Rubinstein
(2000) ‘Some Implications to Japanese
Competitiveness’, pp. 175–191 in
R. Boyer
and
T. Yamada
(eds) Japanese Capitalism in Crisis.
London: Routledge
.
6.
Council of Economic Advisers
(2001) The Economic Report of the President.
Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
.
7.
Deresky, H.
(1997) International Management: Mapping Across Borders and
Cultures.
New York: HarperCollins
.
8.
DiMaggio, P.J.
and
W.W. Powell
(1983)
‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and
Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’
, American Sociological Review48:
147–160
.
9.
Dirks, D.
,
M. Hemmert
and
J. Legewie
(2000)
‘The Japanese Employment System in Transition’
, International Business Review9:
525–553
.
10.
Dohse, K.
,
U. Jurgens
and
T. Malsch
(1985)
‘From ‘‘Fordism’’ to
‘‘Toyotism’’? The Social
Organization of the Labor Process in the Japanese Automobile Industry’
, Politics and Society14(2):
115–146
.
11.
Dore, R.
(1987) Taking Japan Seriously.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
12.
Dore, R.
(1997) ‘The Distinctiveness of
Japan’, in
C. Crouch
and
W. Streeck
(eds) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and
Diversity.
London: Sage
.
13.
Dore, R.
(2000) Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare
Capitalism–Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
14.
Dornbusch, R.
(1998)
‘On the Edge: Japan Could Topple as Reform Slips, Debt Mounts’
, Far Eastern Economic Review161(9):
52–53
.
Freedman, R.B.
and
J. Rogers
(1999) What Workers Want.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
17.
Green, A.
(2001) ‘Models of High Skills in National
Competition Strategies’, in
P. Brown
,
A. Green
and
H. Lauder
(eds) High Skills.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
18.
Hall, P.A.
and
D. Soskice
(2001) ‘An Introduction to Varieties of
Capitalism’, in
P. Hall
and
D. Soskice
(eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of
Comparative Advantage.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
19.
Helper, S.
(1998) ‘Complementarity and Cost Reduction:
Evidence from the Auto Supply Industry’, Working Paper No. 6033,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
.
20.
Herbig, P.
and
L. Jacobs
(1999)
‘The Future of Japanese Innovation: Leader or Follower?’
, Business Forum24(1/2):
4–8
.
21.
Herrigel, G.
(1997) ‘The Limits of German Manufacturing
Flexibility’, in
L. Turner
(ed.) Negotiating the New Germany: Can Social Partnership Survive?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
22.
Herrigel, G.
and
C.F. Sabel
(1999) ‘Craft Production in Crisis: Industrial
Restructuring in Germany during the 1990s’, in
P.D. Culpepper
and
D. Finegold
(eds) The German Skills Machine.
New York: Berghahn Books
.
23.
Hofstede, G.
(1983)
‘The Cultural Reality of Organizational Practices and Theories’
, Journal of International Business Studies14(2):
75–89
.
24.
Hollingsworth, J.R.
(1997) ‘Continuities and Changes in Social
Systems of Production: The Cases of Japan, Germany, and the United
States’, in
J.R. Hollingsworth
and
R. Boyer
(eds) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
25.
Isa, K.
and
T. Tsuru
(2002)
‘Cell Production and Workplace Innovation in Japan: Toward a New
Model for Japanese Manufacturing’
, Industrial Relations41(4):
548–578
.
26.
Isogai, A.
,
A. Ebizuka
and
H. Uemura
(2000) ‘The Hierarchical Market–Firm
Nexus as the Japanese Mode of Regulation’, in
R. Boyer
and
T. Yamada
(eds) Japanese Capitalism in Crisis.
London: Routledge
.
27.
Itagaki, H.
(1998)
‘Nihonkata Seisan Shisutemu No Kokusai Iten’
[International Transfer of the Japanese System and its Infiuence on
Management Systems at Home and Abroad]
, Shyakai Kagaku Kenkyu50(1):
89–115
.
28.
Japanese Institute of Labor
(2002)
‘Labor–Management Relations’
, Japan Labor Bulletin41(8):
2–5
.
29.
Jurgens, U.
(2000)
‘Convergence or Divergence?: Production Systems and Industrial
Relations in Europe’
, The Bulletin of Yokohama City University52(2):
1–39
.
30.
Kato, T.
(2000) ‘The Recent Transformation of Participatory
Employment Practices in Japan’, NBER Working Paper 7965,
National Bureau of Economic Research
.
31.
Katz, H.
and
O. Darbishire
(2000) Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in
Employment Systems.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
32.
Katz, R.
(2003) Japanese Phoenix: The Long Road to Economic
Revival.
New York: M.E. Sharpe
.
33.
Kingston, J.
(2001) Japan in Transformation, 1952–2000.
Harlow: Longman
.
34.
Koike, K.
(1994) ‘Learning and Incentive Systems in
Japanese Industry’, in
M. Aoki
and
R. Dore
(eds) The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
35.
Koike, K.
(2000)
‘Shokuba No Jinzai Kaihatsu’ [Human Resource
Development on the Shopfioor]
, Shyakai Kagaku Kenkyu52(1):
3–23
.
36.
Krugman, P.
(1996) Pop Internationalism.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
37.
Kwon, H.
(2003)
‘The German Model Reconsidered’
, German Politics and Society20(4):
48–72
.
38.
Lin, C.C.
(2001) ‘The Changing Keiretsu: Is the Japanese
Model Still Efficient in the New Japan?’, Working Paper,
National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan
.
39.
Lindsey, B.
and
A. Lukas
(1998)
‘ ‘‘Revisiting the
Revisionists’’: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese
Economic Model’
, CATO Trade Policy Analysis (CATO Institute)3 (31 July); at: www.freetrade.org/pubs/pas/tpa-003.html
40.
McKinsey Global Institute
(2000) ‘Why the Japanese Economy is not Growing:
Micro Barriers to Productivity Growth’, mimeo, July.
Washinton, DC: McKinsey Global Institute
.
41.
Manpower, Inc.
(2002) International Employee Loyalty Survey.
Milwaukee, WI: Manpower, Inc.
; at: www.manpower.com/mpcom/.les?name=intl_comparison.pdf
42.
Morishima, M.
(2001)
‘Contingent Workers in Japan: New Developments and Unexpected Consequences’
, Japan Labor Bulletin40(3):
6–14
.
43.
Morishima, M.
(2002)
‘Pay Practices in Japanese Organizations: Changes and Non-Changes’
, Japan Labor Bulletin41(4):
8–13
.
44.
Mroczkowski, T.
and
M. Hanaoka
(1998)
‘The End of Japanese Management: How Soon?’
, Human Resource Planning21(3):
20–30
.
45.
OECD
(1973) Manpower Policy in Japan.
Paris: OECD
.
46.
OECD
(1977) The Development of Industrial Relations Systems: Some
Implications of Japanese Experience.
Paris: OECD
.
47.
OECD
(2000) A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and
Information Technology in Growth.
Paris: OECD
.
48.
Ohtsu, M.
(2002) Inside Japanese Business: A Narrative History,
1960–2000.
New York: M.E. Sharpe
.
49.
Pil, F.K.
and
J.P. MacDuffie
(1996)
‘The Adoption of High-Involvement Work Practices’
, Industrial Relations35:
423–455
.
50.
Piore, M.J.
(2000)
‘Diversity in Economic Organizations: An American Perspective on
the Implication of European Integration for the Economic Performance of Japan’
, The Bulletin of Yokohama City University52(2):
40–49
.
51.
Posen, A.S.
(2002) ‘Japan’, in
B. Steil
,
D.G. Victor
, and
R.R. Nelson
(eds) Technological Innovation and Economic Performance.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
52.
Pruijt, H.
(2003)
‘Teams between Neo-Taylorism and Anti-Taylorism’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy24(1):
77–101
.
53.
Rowen, H.S.
and
A.M. Toyoda
(2002) ‘From Keiretsu to Startups:
Japan’s Push for High Tech Entrepreneurship’, Working
Paper at the Asia/Paci.c Research Center, Stanford University.
54.
Shinozaki, T.
(2002)
‘Wage Inequality and its Determinants in the 1980s and 1990s’
, Japan Labor Bulletin41(8):
6–12
.
55.
Shirai, T.
(2000) Japanese Industrial Relations.
Tokyo: The Japan Institute of Labour
.
56.
Streeck, W.
(1996) ‘Lean Production in the German Automobile
Industry: A Test Case for Convergence Theory’, in
S. Berger
and
R. Dore
(eds) National Diversity and Global Capitalism.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
57.
Streeck, W.
and
K. Yamamura
(2003) ‘Introduction: Convergence or Diversity?
Stability and Change in German and Japanese Capitalism’, in
K. Yamamura
and
W. Streeck
(eds) The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese
Capitalism.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
58.
Takezawa, S.
and
A.M. Whitehill
(1981) Work Ways: Japan and America.
Tokyo: The Japan Institute of Labour
.
59.
Wakisaka, A.
(2002)
‘Work-Sharing in Japan’
, Japan Labor Bulletin41(6):
7–13
.
60.
Womack, J.P.
,
D.T. Jones
, and
D. Roos
(1990) The Machine that Changed the World.
New York: Harper Perennial
.
61.
Yamada, T.
(2000) ‘Japanese Capitalism and the Companyist
Compromise’, in
R. Boyer
and
T. Yamada
(eds) Japanese Capitalism in Crisis.
London: Routledge
.
62.
Yamamura, K.
and
W. Streeck
, eds (2003) The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and
Japanese Capitalism.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
