Assessment of predicted versus measured thermal comfort and optimal comfort ranges in the outdoor environment in the temperate climate of Glasgow,UK

Abstract

In a warming world, the risk of overheating is significant in temperate climate areas such as Glasgow, UK where adaptation to overheating is low. An easy-to-use thermal comfort evaluation is therefore a necessary first step towards developing effective coping mechanisms. In this study, we explore the effectiveness of Predicted Mean Vote, Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied and Physiologically Equivalent Temperature, together with air temperature in mimicking actual thermal sensation votes of street users obtained in 2011 in Glasgow City Centre. The Predicted Mean Vote/Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied indices developed for controlled indoors show a surprising similarity to actual thermal sensation votes derived from outdoor surveys, than the Physiologically Equivalent Temperature developed specifically for the outdoors. The method of calculation of mean radiant temperature is the key to improved performance of Physiologically Equivalent Temperature, with fish-eye lens photographs improving its performance. The results also show air temperature alone has nearly equal predictive power of the actual thermal sensation. A preliminary comfort range for Glasgow is also derived and its limitations are explored.

Practical application : The strong relation between thermal sensation votes and air temperature (T_a) enables future thermal comfort studies to predict the thermal comfort using easy-to-access T_a only. A current thermal comfort study in Glasgow aiming at developing a link between urban morphology and T_a is already using this strong relation to predict outdoor thermal comfort in the city centre. This helps to establish a correlation between these three factors.

Keywords

Environmental comfort comfort ranges thermal comfort Predicted Mean Vote Physiologically Equivalent Temperature

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ebi

Burton

McGregor

. Biometeorology for adaptation to climate variability and change, Dortrecht: Springer, 2009.

VDI, 1998: VDI 3787. Methoden zur human-biometeorologischen bewertung von klima und lufthygiene für die stadt- und regionalplanung, Teil I: klima. Düsseldorf: Verein deutscher engenieure, 1998.

Kovats

Hajat

. Heat stress and public health: a critical review. Annu Rev Publ Health 2008; 29: 41–55.

Vanos

Warland

Gillespie

. Review of the physiology of human thermal comfort while exercising in urban landscapes and implications for bioclimatic design. Int J Biometeorol 2010; 54: 319–334.

Hajat

Kosatky

. Heat-related mortality: a review and exploration of heterogeneity. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64: 753–760.

Holst

Mayer

. Impacts of street design parameters on human-biometeorological variables. Meteorol Z 2010; 20: 541–552.

Gul

Jenkins

Patidar

. Tailoring a future overheating risk tool for existing building design practice in domestic and non-domestic sectors. Build Serv Eng Res Tech 2012; 33: 105–117.

Mavrogianni

Davies

Batty

. The comfort, energy and health implications of London's urban heat island. Build Serv Eng Res Tech 2011; 32: 35–52.

Humphreys

Rijal

Nicol

. Updating the adaptive relation between climate and comfort indoors; new insights and an extended database. Build Environ 2013; 63: 40–55.

10.

ISO 7730. Moderate thermal environments – determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort, 3rd ed. Geneva: International Standard, 2005.

11.

Höppe

. The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol 1999; 43: 71–75.

12.

Matzarakis A, Rutz F and Mayer H. Modelling the thermal bioclimate in urban areas with the RayMan Model. In: PLEA2006 – The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

13.

Eliasson

Knez

Westerberg

. Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landsc Urban Plann 2007; 82: 72–84.

14.

Nikolopoulou

Baker

Steemers

. Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameter. Sol Energ 2001; 70: 227–235.

15.

Thorsson

Lindqvist

. Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Göteborg, Sweden. Int J Biometeorol 2004; 48: 149–156.

16.

Lindberg

Holmer

Thorsson

. SOLWEIG 1.0 – modelling spatial variations of 3D radiant fluxes and mean radiant temperature in complex urban settings. Int J Biometeorol 2008; 52: 697–713.

17.

Krüger

Drach

Emmanuel

. Assessment of daytime outdoor comfort levels in and outside the urban area of Glasgow, UK. Int J Biometeorol 2013; 57: 521–533.

18.

Krüger

Drach

Emmanuel

. Urban heat island and differences in outdoor comfort levels in Glasgow, UK. Theor Appl Climatol 2013; 112: 127–141.

19.

7726

ISO

. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Instruments for measuring physical quantities, Geneva: International Standard, 1998.

20.

UK Met Office. Monthly and annual average climate data at 5 km resolution. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/stationdata/ (2014, accessed 16 July 2014).

21.

Matzarakis

Mayer

Iziomon

. Applications of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. Int J Biometeorol 1999; 43: 76–84.

22.

Nikolopoulou

Baker

Steemers

. Improvements to the globe thermometer for outdoor use. Architect Sci Rev 1999; 42: 27–34.

23.

Thorsson

Lindberg

Eliasson

. Different methods for estimating the mean radiant temperature in an outdoor urban setting. Int J Climatol 2007; 27: 1983–1993.

24.

Johansson

Thorsson

Emmanuel

. Instruments and methods in outdoor thermal comfort studies – the need for standardization. Urban Clim 2014; 10: 346–366. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2013.12.002 (2014, accessed 30 November 2014).

25.

ISO

10551

. Ergonomics of the thermal environment–assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales, Geneva: International Standard, 1995.

26.

ANSI/ASHRAE. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy (ANSI Approved). American society of heating, refrigerating, and air-conditioning engineers. Standard 55-2004, 2004.

27.

Höppe

. Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort. Energ Build 2002; 34: 661–665.

28.

Matzarakis

Rutz

Mayer

. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 2010; 54: 131–139.

29.

The R Project for Statistical Computing. R was developed at Bell Laboratories (formerly AT&T, now Lucent Technologies) by John Chambers and colleagues, http://www.r-project.org/ (2013, accessed 30 November 2014).

30.

Mayer

Holst

Dostal

. Human thermal comfort in summer within an urban street canyon in Central Europe. Meteorol Z 2008; 17: 241–250.

31.

Svensson

Thorsson

Lindqvist

. A geographical information system model for creating bioclimatic maps – examples from a high, mid-latitude city. Int J Biometeorol 2003; 47: 102–112.

32.

Ali-Toudert

Mayer

. Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate. Build Environ 2006; 41: 94–108.