Evaluating contextually adapted reading interventions with third-grade,Costa Rican students experiencing significant reading difficulties

Abstract

Scholarship in school psychology has continued to document the need and importance of contextually relevant intervention and prevention research, but this type of research remains relatively scarce. Also problematic, this type of research is even more limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) compared to high-income countries. This situation within school psychology scholarship not only has negative implications for research and practice, it also limits internationalization within the discipline. The geographical context for the present study was in Costa Rica, currently a Latin American LMIC. Given the global importance of literacy, this article describes an experimental evaluation comparing two time- and resource-efficient reading interventions that differed only by instructional grouping: A one-on-one intervention, and an even more resource-efficient small-group intervention. Participants included third-graders experiencing significant reading difficulties. Analyses showed that all students benefitted from intervention, but some students responded somewhat more favorably to one intervention versus the other. Limitations, implications, and future research directions are discussed, particularly within the context of international school psychology and how professionals in the discipline can benefit from more intervention research in otherwise underrepresented global regions.

Keywords

dual-language programs intervention Latin America LMIC reading fluency single-case design research small-group instruction Spanish reading

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Álvarez-Cañizo

Suárez-Coalla

Cuetos

(2015) The role of reading fluency in children’s text comprehension. Frontiers of Psychology 6: 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01810.

Armbuster, B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read (Kindergarten through Grade 3). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Arnett

J. J

(2008) The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist 63: 602–614. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602.

Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Begeny

J. C.

(2018) A working definition and conceptual model of internationalization for school and educational psychology. Psychology in the Schools 55: 924–940. doi: 10.1002/pits.22157.

Begeny

J. C.

Levy

R. A.

Field

S. A.

(2018a) Using small-group instruction to improve students’ reading fluency: An evaluation of the existing research. Journal of Applied School Psychology 34: 36–64. doi: 10.1080/15377903.2017.1328628.

Begeny

J. C.

Levy

R. A.

Hida

R. M.

Norwalk

(2018b) Experimental research in school psychology internationally: An assessment of journal publications and implications for internationalization. Psychology in the Schools 55: 120–136. doi: 10.1002/pits.22070.

Begeny, J. C., Levy, R. A., Hida, R. M., Norwalk, K., Field, S., Suzuki, H., et al. (2018c). Geographically representative scholarship and internationalization in school and educational psychology: A bibliometric analysis of eight journals from 2002–2016. Journal of School Psychology, 70, 44–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.07.001.

Begeny

J. C.

Wang

Hida

R. M.

Oluokun

H. O.

Jones

R. A.

(2018d) A global examination of peer-reviewed, scholarly journal outlets devoted to school and educational psychology. Manuscript submitted for publication .

10.

Bliss

S. L.

Skinner

C. H.

Hautau

Carroli

E. E.

(2008) Articles published in four school psychology journals from 2000 to 2005: An analysis of experimental/intervention research. Psychology in the Schools 45: 483–498. doi: 10.1002/pits.20318.

11.

Burns

M. K.

Klingbeil

D. A.

Ysseldyke

J. E.

Petersen-Brown

(2012) Trends in methodological rigor in intervention research published in school psychology journals. Psychology in the Schools 49: 843–851. doi: 10.1002/pits.21637.

12.

Burns

Taylor

Warmbold-Brann

Preast

Hosp

Ford

(2017) Empirical synthesis of the effect of standard error of measurement on decisions made within brief experimental analyses of reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools 54: 640–654. doi: 10.1002/pits.22022.

13.

Center for Global Development. (2016). Literacy of adults in developing countries: New data from a skills survey. Retrieved from https://www.cgdev.org/blog/literacy-adults-developing-countries-new-data-skills-survey.

14.

Chen

(2007) Effects of treatment on disruptive behaviors: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches using the PEM approach. The Behavior Analyst Today 8: 380–397. doi: 10.1037/h0100629.

15.

Christ

Silberglitt

(2007) Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum based measures of oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review 36: 130–146.

16.

Daane

M. C.

Campbell

J. R.

Grigg

W. S.

Goodman

M. J.

Oranje

(2005) Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC.

17.

Dang

H. M.

Weiss

Trung

(2018) Mental health literacy and intervention program adaptation in the internationalization of school psychology for Vietnam. Psychology in the Schools 55: 941–954. doi: 10.1002/pits.22156.

18.

Horner

R. H.

Carr

E. G.

Halle

McGee

Odom

Wolery

(2005) The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children 7: 165–179. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100203.

19.

Hseih

Acee

Chungh

Hseih

Kim

Thomas

et al. (2005) Is educational research on the decline. Journal of Educational Psychology 97: 523–529. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.523.

20.

Kakarmath

Denis

Encinas-Martin

Borgonovi

Subramanian

S. V.

(2018) Association between literacy and self-rated poor health in 33 high- and upper middle-income countries. International Journal of Public Health 63: 213–222. doi: 10.1787/19939019.

21.

Klingbeil, D. A., Van Norman, E. R., McLendon, K. E., Ross, S. G., & Begeny, J. C. (2018). Evaluating Tau-U with oral reading fluency data and the impact of measurement error. Behavior Modification. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0145445518760174.

22.

Klubnik

Ardoin

S. P.

(2010) Examining immediate and maintenance effects of a reading intervention package on generalization materials: Individual versus group implementation. Journal of Behavioral Education 19: 7–29. doi: 10.1007/s10864-009-9096-3.

23.

Kratochwill

T. R.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Horner

R. H.

Levin

J. R.

Odom

Rindskopf

D. M.

Shadish

W. R.

(2012) Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education 34: 26–38. doi: 10.1177/0741932512452794.

24.

Lee

Yoon

S. Y.

(2017) The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities 50: 213–224. doi: 10.1177/0022219415605194.

25.

Leon, C., Campagnaro, S., & Matos, M. (2007). School psychology in Venezuela. In S. R. Jimerson, T. D. Oakland, & P. T. Ferrell (Eds.), The handbook of international school psychology (pp. 427–435). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

26.

Lions, S. & Pena, M. (2016). Reading comprehension in Latin America: Difficulties and possible interventions. In D. D. Preiss (Ed.), Child and adolescent development in Latin America. New directions for child and adolescent development (p. 71–84). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

27.

(2006) An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification 30: 598–617. doi: 10.1177/0145445504272974.

28.

Manolov

Onghena

(2017) Analyzing data from single-case alternating treatments designs. Psychological Methods 22: 1–25. doi: 10.1037/met0000133.

29.

Manolov, R., Solanas, A., & Leiva, D. (2010). Comparing ‘visual’ effect size indices for single-case designs. Methodology, 6, 49–58. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000006.

30.

Morgan

P. L.

Sideridis

G. D.

(2006) Contrasting the effectiveness of fluency interventions for students with or at risk for learning disabilities: A meta analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 21: 191–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00218.x.

31.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

32.

Nastasi

B. K.

(2017) Cultural competence for global research and development. Implications for school and educational psychology. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology 5: 207–210. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2016.1276817.

33.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: Reading, 2015, National results overview (NCES 2015–136). Washington, DC: US Department of Education: NAEP.

34.

O’Gorman

Shum

Halford

K. W.

Ogilvie

(2012) World trends in psychological research output and impact. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation 1: 268–283. doi: 10.1037/a0030520.

35.

Pearson Education, Inc. (2011). AIMSweb. Bloomington, MN: Author.

36.

Piocuda

J. E.

Smyers

J. O.

Knyshev

Harris

R. J.

Rai

(2015) Trends of internationalization and collaboration in US psychology journals 1950–2010. Archives of Scientific Psychology 3: 82–92. doi: 10.1037/arc0000020.

37.

Richards-Tutor

Baker

Gersten

Baker

Smith

(2016) The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children 82: 144–169. doi: 10.1177/0014402915585483.

38.

Ross

S. G.

Begeny

J. C.

(2015) An examination of treatment intensity with an oral reading fluency intervention: Do intervention duration and student-teacher instructional ratios impact intervention effectiveness? Journal of Behavioral Education 24: 11–32. doi: 10.1007/s10864-014-9202-z.

39.

Ross

S. G.

Begeny

J. C.

(2014) Single-case effect size calculation: Comparing regression and non-parametric approaches across previously published reading intervention data sets. Journal of School Psychology 52: 419–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.003.

40.

Seethaler

Fuchs

(2005) A Drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 20: 98–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00125.x.

41.

Soto, C. M., Casapia, M. D., Ponce, L. Z., & Morales, L. B. (2007). School psychology in Peru. In S. R. Jimerson, T. D. Oakland, & P. T. Ferrell (Eds.), The handbook of international school psychology (pp. 299–307). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

42.

Strein

Cramer

Lawser

(2003) School psychology research and scholarship. School Psychology International 24: 421–436. doi: 10.1177/01430343030244005.

43.

Therrien

W. J.

(2004) Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education 25: 252–261. doi: 10.1177/07419325040250040801.

44.

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

(2013) Contributions of internationalization to psychology: Toward a global and inclusive discipline. American Psychologist 68: 761–770. doi: 10.1037/a0033762.

45.

Vaughn

Linan-Thompson

Kouzekanani

Pedrotty Bryant

Dickson

Blozis

(2003) Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education 24: 301–315. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240050501.

46.

Villarreal

Castro

M. J.

Umana

Sullivan

J. R.

(2017) Characteristics of intervention research in school psychology journals: 2010–2014. Psychology in the Schools 54: 548–559. doi: 10.1002/pits.22012.