Effects of Technology Enhancements and Type of Teacher Support on Assessing Spanish-Speaking Children’s Oral Reading Fluency in Second Grade

Abstract

We examined student-, classroom-, and school-level effects in predicting second-grade Spanish-speaking children’s oral reading fluency in Spanish. Teachers in 67 randomly selected urban schools administered the Tejas LEE to 1,537 first- and second-grade students. Oral reading fluency was measured in the passages students read for comprehension. Covariates were mean fluency in Grade 1, variability in fluency in Grade 1, degree of grouping in the school, and the proportion of second-grade students in the classroom and/or the school taking the Tejas LEE. Treatment effects were administration format (paper, desktop, handheld) and type of teacher support (no mentoring, web mentoring, and on-site plus web mentoring). Second-grade teachers positively affected students’ reading fluency when (a) they administered the Tejas LEE on paper with the associated paper reports in classrooms of bilingual students, and (b) they either received web mentoring and had relatively homogeneous classrooms or received on-site or no mentoring and had ability-grouped classes. Implications for interpreting assessment results are discussed in the context of the type of support provided to teachers and the grouping of bilingual students by language and/or by ability.

Keywords

Spanish reading assessment oral reading fluency mentoring coaching technology enhancements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

D. V.

(2008). A functionality framework for educational organizations: Achieving accountability at scale. In Mandinach

Honey

(Eds.), Data driven school improvement: Linking data and learning (pp. 257–276). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Anthony

J. L.

Solari

E. J.

Williams

J. M.

Schoger

K. D.

Zhang

Branum-Martin

Francis

D. J.

(2009). Development of bilingual phonological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: The roles of vocabulary, letter knowledge, and prior phonological awareness. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 535–564.

Baker

E. L.

(2003). Reflections on technology-enhanced assessment. Assessment in Education, 10, 421–424.

Bean

R. M.

Draper

J. A.

Hall

Vandermolen

Zigmond

(2010). Coaches and coaching in Reading First schools: A reality check. Elementary School Journal, 111, 87–114.

Benjamini

Hochberg

(1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.

Benjamini

Yekutieli

(2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188.

Biancarosa

Bryk

Dexter

(2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34.

Branum-Martin

Foorman

B. R.

Francis

D. J.

Mehta

(2010). Contextual effects of bilingual programs on beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 341–355.

Branum-Martin

Mehta

P. D.

Fletcher

J. M.

Carlson

C. D.

Ortiz

Carlo

Francis

(2006). Bilingual phonological awareness: Multilevel construct validation among Spanish-speaking Kindergartens in transitional bilingual education classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 170–181.

10.

Branum-Martin

Mehta

P. D.

Francis

D. J.

Foorman

B. R.

Cirino

P. T.

Miller

J. F.

Inglesias

(2009). Pictures and words: Spanish and English vocabulary in classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 897–911.

11.

Bravo-Valdivieso

(1995). A four year follow-up study of low socioeconomic status, Latin American children with reading difficulties. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 42, 189–202.

12.

Bridgeman

(2009). Experiences from large-scale computer-based testing in the USA. In Scheuermann

Björnsson

(Eds.), The transition to computer-based assessment: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (pp. 39–44). Luxembourg: European Communities.

13.

Carrillo

(1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition. A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing, 6, 279–298.

14.

Cassidy

Garrett

S. D.

Maxfield

Patchett

(2010). Literacy coaching: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In Cassidy

Garrett

S.D.

Sailors

(Eds.), Literacy coaching: Research and practice (pp. 15–27). Corpus Christi, TX: Center for Educational Development, Evaluation, and Research.

15.

Cirino

Pollard-Durodola

S. D.

Foorman

B. R.

Carlson

C. D.

Francis

D. J.

(2007). Teacher characteristics, classroom instruction, and student literacy and language outcomes in bilingual kindergartners. Elementary School Journal, 107, 341–364.

16.

de la Colina

M. G.

Parker

Hasbrouck

Lara-Alecio

(2001). Intensive intervention in reading fluency for at-risk Spanish readers. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 503–538.

17.

Denton

Hasbrouck

Weaver

Riccio

(2000). What do we know about phonological awareness in Spanish? Reading Psychology, 21, 335–352.

18.

Dynarski

Agodini

Heaviside

Novak

Carey

Campuzano

. . . Sussex

(2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

19.

Fixsen

D. L.

Naoom

S. F.

Blasé

K. A.

Friedman

R. M.

Wallace

(2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI#231).

20.

Foorman

York

Santi

Francis

(2008). Contextual effects on predicting risk for reading difficulties in first and second grade. Reading and Writing, 21, 371–394.

21.

Francis

D. J.

Rivera

M. O.

(2007). Principles underlying English language proficiency tests and academic accountability for ELLs. In Abedi

(Ed.), English language proficiency assessment in the nation: Current status and future practice (pp. 13–32). Davis: University of California.

22.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Hosp

M. K.

Jenkins

J. R.

(2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.

23.

Gamoran

(1992). Syntheses of research: Is ability grouping equitable? Educational Leadership, 50(2), 11–17.

24.

Gamoran

Berends

(1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415–435.

25.

Garet

M. S.

Cronen

Eaton

Kurki

Ludwig

Jones

. . . Sztejnberg

(2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE Report 2008-4031). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.

26.

Gottardo

(2002). The relationship between language and reading skill in bilingual Spanish-English speakers. Topics in Language Disorders, 22, 46–70.

27.

Hamilton

Halverson

Jackson

Mandinach

Supovitz

Wayman

(2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation & Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

28.

Hoffer

T. B.

(1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 205–227.

29.

Hollis

Campbell

(1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis: Surveys of published randomized controlled studies. British Medical Journal, 319, 670–674.

30.

IDEL (Indicadores Dinámicos del Ėxito en la Lectura). (2007). Eugene: University of Oregon.

31.

Jenkins

J. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

van den Broek

Espin

Deno

S. L.

(2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.

32.

Kim

Petscher

Schatschneider

Foorman

(in press). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading? Journal of Educational Psychology.

33.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C.-L. C.

(1992). Ability grouping and gifted students. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178–197). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

34.

Linan-Thompson

Bryant

D. P.

Dickson

S. V.

Kouzekanani

(2005). Spanish literacy instruction for at-risk kindergarten students. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 236–244.

35.

Lockwood

J. R.

McCombs

Marsh

(2010). Linking reading coaches and student achievement: Evidence from Florida middle schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 372–388.

36.

Lou

Abrami

P. C.

Spence

J. C.

Poulsen

Chambers

d’Apolonia

(1996). Within class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.

37.

Manrique

A. M. B.

Signorini

(1994). Phonological awareness, spelling and reading abilities in Spanish-speaking children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 429–439.

38.

Marsh

J. A.

McCombs

J. S.

Lockwood

J. R.

Martorell

Gershwin

Naftel

. . . Crego

(2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: A study of Florida middle school reading coaches. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

39.

Matsumura

L. C.

Garnier

J. E.

Correnti

Junker

Bickel

D. D.

(2010). Investigating the effectiveness of a comprehensive literacy coaching program in schools with high teacher mobility. Elementary School Journal, 111, 35–62.

40.

McCoach

D. B.

O’Connell

A. A.

Levitt

(2006). Ability grouping across kindergarten using an early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 339–346.

41.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). National Reading Panel–Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Pub. No. 00-4754). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

42.

Oakes

(2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

43.

Perfetti

C. A.

(1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

44.

Pianta

R. C.

Mashburn

A. J.

Downer

J. T.

Hamre

B. K.

Justice

(2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.

45.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

46.

Robinson

J. P.

(2008). Evidence of a differential effect of ability grouping on the reading achievement growth of language-minority Hispanics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 141–180.

47.

Russell

Goldberg

O’Connor

(2003). Computer-based testing and validity: A look back into the future. Assessment in Education, 10, 279–293.

48.

Sailors

Price

L. R.

(2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 110, 301–322.

49.

Sailors

Shanklin

N. L.

(2010). Introduction: Growing evidence to support coaching in literacy and mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 111, 1–6.

50.

Seymour

P. H. K.

(2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In Snowling

M. J.

Hulme

(Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 296–315). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

51.

Seymour

P. H. K.

Aro

Erskine

J. M.

(2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

52.

Signorini

(1997). Word reading in Spanish: A comparison between skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 319–344.

53.

Slavin

R. E.

(1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.

54.

Tach

Farkas

(2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35, 1048–1079.

55.

Tejas LEE. (2004–2006). Austin, TX: University of Texas System and Texas Education Agency.

56.

Texas Primary Reading Inventory . (2004–2006). Austin, TX: University of Texas System and Texas Education Agency.

57.

Tieso

C. L.

(2003). Ability grouping isn’t tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26, 29–37.

58.

Wayman

J. C.

Cho

(2008). Preparing educators to effectively use student data systems. In Kowalski

T. J.

Lasley

T. J.

(Eds.), Handbook on data-based decision-making in education (pp. 89–104). New York, NY: Routledge.

59.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2008). What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (version 2.0). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/Doc.aspx?docId=19&tocId=10

60.

Wiley

H. I.

Deno

S. L.

(2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207–214.

61.

Woodcock

R. W.

Johnson

M. B.

(1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery–Revised. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

62.

Yovanoff

Duesbery

Alonzo

Tindal

(2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 4–12.

63.

Zigler

J. C.

Goswami

(2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.