This study analysed the psychological and social characteristics of bullies involved in traditional and cyberbullying. The responses of 11,117 Korean elementary, middle, and high school students were analysed. Results indicate that the rate of traditional bullying was higher than the rate of cyberbullying. The four groups (traditional bullies, cyberbullies, combined bullies, and non-involved) showed significant differences in the degree of aggression, self-control, violence exposure, and social support. Compared to the non-involved group, violence exposure significantly predicted traditional, cyber, and combined bullying. High aggression and low self-control significantly predicted both traditional and combined bullying, while low social support significantly predicted only cyberbullying.
AgatstonP.KowalskiR.LimberS. (2008) Cyber bullying. Bullying in the digital age, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
2.
AhnE. K.YoonH. Y.KwonJ. H. (2008) The effect of violent online games and aggressive personality traits on aggressive behavior. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology27(2): 355–371. doi: 10.15842/kjcp.2008.27.2.001.
3.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2001) Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science12(5): 353–359. doi:.1111/1467-9280.00366.
4.
AndersonC. A.DillK. E. (2000) Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings10, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(4): 772, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772.
5.
ArseneaultL.WalshE.TrzesniewskiK.NewcombeR.CaspiA.& MoffittT. E. (2006) Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics118(1): 130–138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2388.
6.
BanduraA. (1973) Aggression: A social learning analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Halldoi: 10.2307/1227918.
7.
BanninkR.BroerenS.van de Looij–JansenP. M.de WaartF. G.RaatH. (2014) Cyber and traditional bullying victimization as a risk factor for mental health problems and suicidal ideation in adolescents. PloS one9(4): e94026, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094026.
8.
Barrat, E. S. (1985). Impulsiveness sub-traits: Arousal and information processing. Motivation, Emotion and Personality. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9.
BeckmanL.HagquistC.HellströmL. (2012) Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying?Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties17(3–4): 421–434. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704228.
10.
BurtonK. A.FlorellD.GoreJ. S. (2013) Differences in proactive and reactive aggression in traditional bullies and cyberbullies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma22(3): 316–328. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2013.743938.
11.
BussA. H.PerryM. (1992) The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(3): 452–459. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.
12.
CalveteE.OrueI.EstévezA.VillardónL.PadillaP. (2010) Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior26(5): 1128–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017.
13.
CampbellM.SpearsB.SleeP.ButlerD.KiftS. (2012) Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties17(3–4): 389–401. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704316.
14.
CantoneE.PirasA. P.VallanteM.PretiA.DanielsdottirS.D’AlojaE.LesinskieneS.AngermeyerM. C.CartaM. G.BhugraD. (2015) Interventions on bullying and cyberbullying in schools: A systematic review. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH11(Suppl 1 M4): 58–76. doi: 10.2174/1745017901511010058.
15.
ChoY. O. (2013) The impact of cyber bullying victim experience and the influence of mediating effect of depression on delinquent behaviors. Korean Journal of Youth Studies20: 117–142.
16.
CillessenA. H.MayeuxL. (2004) From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development75(1): 147–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.
17.
CoreyG. (2017) Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy, (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
18.
CrothersL. M.LevinsonE. M. (2004) Assessment of bullying: A review of methods and instruments. Journal of Counseling and Development82(4): 496–503. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00338.x.
19.
DavidsonL. M.DemarayM. K. (2007) Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review36(3): 383.
20.
Den HamerA. H.KonijnE. A. (2015) Adolescents’ media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health56(2): 203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.016.
21.
DooleyJ. J.PyżalskiJ.CrossD. (2009) Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Journal of Psychology217(4): 182–188. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182.
22.
DubowE. F.UllmanD. G. (1989) Assessing social support in elementary school children: The survey of children’s social support. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology18(1): 52–64. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1801_7.
23.
EnglanderE. (2013) Bullying and cyberbullying: What every educator needs to know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
24.
ErentaitėR.BergmanL. R.ŽukauskienėR. (2012) Cross-contextual stability of bullying victimization: A person-oriented analysis of cyber and traditional bullying experiences among adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology53(2): 181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00935.x.
25.
EvansC. B.SmokowskiP. R. (2015) Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth and Adolescence44(12): 2289–2307. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0338-5.
26.
FantiK. A.DemetriouA. G.HawaV. V. (2012) A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology9(2): 168–181. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2011.643169.
27.
FarringtonD.BaldryA. (2010) Individual risk factors for school bullying. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research2(1): 4–16. doi: 10.5042/jacpr.2010.0001.
28.
FlanneryD. J.SingerM. I.WesterK. (2001) Violence exposure, psychological trauma, and suicide risk in a community sample of dangerously violent adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry40(4): 435–442. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200104000-00012.
29.
GibsonC.WrightJ. (2001) Low self-control and coworker delinquency: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice29(6): 483–492. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00111-8.
30.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990) A general theory of crime, Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
GradingerP.StrohmeierD.SpielC. (2009) Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology217(4): 205–213. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205.
32.
HaseC. N.GoldbergS. B.SmithD.StuckA.CampainJ. (2015) Impacts of traditional bullying and cyberbullying on the mental health of middle school and high school students. Psychology in the Schools52(6): 607–617. doi: 10.1002/pits.21841.
33.
HeimanT.Olenik-ShemeshD.EdenS. (2015) Cyberbullying involvement among students with ADHD: Relation to loneliness, self-efficacy, and social support. European Journal of Special Needs Education30(1): 15–29. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2014.943562.
34.
HemphillS. A.TollitM.KotevskiA.HeerdeJ. A. (2014) Predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying victimization a longitudinal study of Australian secondary school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence30(15): 2567, doi: 10.1177/0886260514553636.
35.
HeppnerP. P.PetersenC. H. (1982) The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology29(1): 66–75. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66.
36.
HodgesE. V.BoivinM.VitaroF.BukowskiW. M. (1999) The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology35(1): 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94.
37.
HubbardJ. A. (2001) Emotion expression processes in children’s peer interaction: The role of peer rejection, aggression, and gender. Child Development72(5): 1426–1438. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00357.
38.
IvarssonT.BrobergA. G.ArvidssonT.GillbergC. (2005) Bullying in adolescence: Psychiatric problems in victims and bullies as measured by the Youth Self Report (YSR) and the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry59(5): 365–373. doi: 10.1080/08039480500227816.
39.
JoseP. E.KljakovicM.ScheibE.NotterO. (2012) The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence22(2): 301–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00764.x.
40.
Juvonen, J., & Galvan, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. M. J. Prinstein, K. A. Dodge (Eds). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. (pp. 225–244). New York, NY, Guilford Press.
41.
KimJ. Y.JangY. E.MinJ. A. (2011) A study on the effect of school violence to adolescent’s school adjustment: Moderating effect of parent-child communication. Korean Journal of Youth Studies18(7): 209–234.
42.
KimK. E.ChoiE. H. (2012) A study on the effect of school violence victimization on adolescents cyber violence: Focus on mediating effect of aggression. Journal of Adolescent Welfare14(3): 259–283.
43.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2007) Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): S22–S30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.
44.
Ku (2007) A Study on the triggering and medicating factor of online flaming. Korean Association for Communication and Information Studies39(1): 224–249.
45.
KuntscheE.PickettW.OverpeckM.CraigW.BoyceW.& de MatosM. G. (2006) Television viewing and forms of bullying among adolescents from eight countries. Journal of Adolescent Health39(6): 908–915. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.007.
46.
LeeK. J. (2009) Research on the impact of mass media on childhood aggression. Korean Journal of 21 Century Society Welfare6(1): 33–49.
47.
LeeS. K.OhI. S. (2012) Comparative analysis of factors influencing on off-line bullying and cyber-bullying. Asian Journal of Education13(2): 137–161. doi: 10.15753/aje.2012.13.2.006.
48.
LeeS. S. (2004) An empirical study on causes of youth deviance on cyber-space. Korean Criminological Review15(1): 121–154.
49.
LiC. K.HoltT. J.BosslerA. M.MayD. C. (2016) Examining the mediating effects of social learning on the low self-control—cyberbullying relationship in a youth sample. Deviant Behavior37(2): 126–138. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2014.1004023.
50.
LiQ. (2007) New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior23(4): 1777–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005.
51.
LimberS. P.KowalskiR. M.AgatstonP. W. (2009) Cyberbullying: A prevention curriculum for grades 3 to 5, Center City, MN: Hazelden.
52.
McNeelyC. A.NonnemakerJ. M.BlumR. W. (2002) Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of School Health72(4): 138–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x.
53.
Ministry of Education (2016) 2016 The national survey on the state of school violence analysis result, Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education Press.
54.
MoJ. E.OhI. S.KimY. H. (2014) Development and validation of questionnaire assessing risk factors of cyberbullying offenders for elementary school students. The Journal of Elementary Education27(4): 131–155.
55.
NotarC. E.PadgettS.RodenJ. (2013) Cyberbullying: Resources for intervention and prevention. Universal Journal of Educational Research1(3): 133–145. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010301.
56.
O’BrennanL. M.BradshawC. P.SawyerA. L. (2009) Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Psychology in the Schools46(2): 100–115. doi: 10.1002/pits.20357.
57.
OhI. S. (2011) Comparative analysis on characteristics of on-line bullying and off-line bullying in elementary schools. Asian Journal of Education12(3): 75–98. doi: 10.15753/aje.2011.12.3.004.
58.
OhI. S. (2014) The relations of traditional bullying, cyberbullying and types of aggression in terms of gender. Korean Journal of Counseling15(5): 1871–1885. doi: 10.15703/kjc.15.5.201410.1871.
59.
Olenik-ShemeshD.HeimanT. (2014) Exploring cyberbullying among primary children in relation to social support, loneliness, self-efficacy, and well-being. Child Welfare93(5): 27–46.
60.
OlweusD. (1994) Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry35(7): 1171–1190. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x.
61.
OrtegaR.ElipeP.Mora-MerchánJ. A.GentaM. L.BrighiA.GuariniA.TippettN. (2012) The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross-national study. Aggressive Behavior38(5): 342–356. doi: 10.1002/ab.21440.
62.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2016) An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Youth Adolescence45: 328–339. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3.
63.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2009) Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
PaulS.SmithP. K.BlumbergH. H. (2013) Surveying bullying using peer nomination methods. Pediatrics Today9(1): 102–111. doi: 10.5457/p2005-114.67.
65.
PyżalskiJ. (2013) Beyond peer cyberbullying–involvement of Polish adolescents in different kinds of electronic aggression. StudiaEdukacyjnenr28: 147–167.
66.
RantaK.Kaltiala-HeinoR.PelkonenM.MarttunenM. (2009) Associations between peer victimization, self-reported depression and social phobia among adolescents: The role of comorbidity. Journal of Adolescence32(1): 77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.11.005.
67.
RaskauskasJ.StoltzA. D. (2007) Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology43(3): 564, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.
68.
RohY. H. (2013) Relationship between social support, psychosocial factors, and health behaviors in the elderly. Health Policy and Management23(2): 162–175. doi: 10.4332/KJHPA.2013.23.2.162.
69.
SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjörkqvistK.ÖstermanK.KaukiainenA. (1996) Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior22(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1%3C1::AID-ABI%3E3.0.CO;2-T.
70.
SánchezF. C.RomeroM. F.Navarro-ZaragozaJ.Ruiz-CabelloA. L.FrantziskoO. R.& MaldonadoA. L. (2016) Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain. BMC Public Health16(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2857-8.
71.
SenteM.KiuruN.VeenstraR.SalmivalliC. (2014) A social network analysis approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth Adolescence43: 1409–1420. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4.
72.
SmithP. K.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.& TippettN. (2008) Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry49(4): 376–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.
73.
SticcaF.PerrenS. (2013) Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence42(5): 739–750. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3.
74.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013) Using multivariate statistics, (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
75.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004) High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality72(2): 271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.
76.
TarablusT.HeimanT.Olenik-ShemeshD. (2015) Cyber bullying among teenagers in Israel: An examination of cyber bullying, traditional bullying, and socioemotional functioning. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma24(6): 707–720. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2015.1049763.
77.
TopcuÇ.Erdur-BakerÖ. (2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International33(5): 550–561. doi: 10.1177/0143034312446882.
78.
Valkenburg, P. M.(2004). Children’s responses to the screen: A media psychology approach. Routledge.
79.
VandeboschH.Van CleemputK. (2008) Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology and Behavior11(4): 499–503. doi: 10.1089.cpb.2007.0042.
80.
VazsonyiA. T.MachackovaH.SevcikovaA.SmahelD.CernaA. (2012) Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology9(2): 210–227. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2011.644919.
81.
Wade, A., & Beran, T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 44–61. doi: 10.1177/0829573510396318.
82.
WangJ.IannottiR. J.NanselT. R. (2009) School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health45(4): 368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.
83.
WangJ.NanselT. R.IannottiR. J. (2011) Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health48(4): 415–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012.
84.
WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G. (2007) Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): S14–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018.
85.
WoodsS.DoneJ.KalsiH. (2009) Peer victimisation and internalising difficulties: The moderating role of friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence32(2): 293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.03.005.
86.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2007) Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health41(2): 189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005.
87.
Youth Violence Prevention Foundation (2013) 2013 The national survey on the state of school violence, Seoul: Youth Violence Prevention Foundation.
88.
ZimmermanF. J.GlewG. M.ChristakisD. A.KatonW. (2005) Early cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and television watching as predictors of subsequent bullying among grade-school children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine159(4): 384–388. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.384.
