In 1991, Bracken and Barona wrote an article for School Psychology International focusing on state of the art procedures for translating and using tests across multiple languages. Considerable progress has been achieved in this area over the 25 years between that publication and today. This article seeks to provide a more current set of suggestions for altering tests originally developed for other cultures and/or languages. Beyond merely describing procedures for linguistic translations, the authors provide suggestions on how to alter, use, and review tests as part of a cultural-linguistic adaptation process. These suggestions are described in a step-by-step manner that is usable both by test adapters and by consumers of adapted tests.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
American Psychological Association (APA, 2010). American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
BrackenB. A.BaronaA. (1991) State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International12: 119–132. doi: 10.1177/0143034391121010.
5.
BrislinR. W. (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychologyVol. 1: Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 389–444.
6.
Butcher, J. N. (1996). Translation and adaptation of the MMPI-2 for international use. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications. (pp. 26–43). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
ByrneB. M.van De VijverF. J. (2010) Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing10: 107–132. doi: 10.1080/15305051003637306.
8.
FlynnJ. R. (1998) IQ gains over time: Toward finding the causes. In: NeisserU. (ed.) The rising curve. Long term gains in IQ and related measures, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 25–66.
9.
García-SánchezI. M.OrellanaM. F.HopkinsM. (2011) Facilitating intercultural communications in parent-teacher conferences: Lessons from child translators. Multicultural Perspectives13: 148–154. doi: 10.1080/15210969.2011.594387.
10.
GeisingerK. F. (1994) Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment6(4): 304–312. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304.
11.
GudmundssonE. (2009) Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology61(2): 29–45. doi: 10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29.
HallbergG. R. (1996) Assessing bilingual and LEP students: Practical issues in the use of interpreters. NASP Communique25(1): 16–18.
14.
HambletonR. K. (2005) Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In: HambletonR. K.MerendaP. F.SpielbergerC. D. (eds) Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment, Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3–38.
15.
HuiC. H.TriandisH. C. (1989) Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology20: 296–309. doi: 10.1177/0022022189203004.
International Test Commission (ITC, 1999). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Johannesburg, South Africa: Author.
KrachS. K.DossK. M.McCreeryM. P. (2015) Multilingual versions of popular social, emotional, and behavioral tests: Considerations for training school psychologists. Trainer's Forum: Journal of the Trainers of School Psychologists33(3): 3–26.
22.
KummanA. J. (2005) Towards a model of test evaluation: Using the test fairness and the test context frameworks. In: TaylorL.WeirC. J. (eds) Multilingualism and assessment: Achieving transparency, assuring quality, sustaining diversity. Proceedings of the ALTE Berlin Conference, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University, pp. 239–251.
23.
Lynch, E. W., & Hanson, M. J. (1996). Ensuring cultural competence in assessment. In M. McLean, D. B. Bailey, Jr., & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.) (pp. 69–94). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
National Association of School Psychologists. (NASP, 2010). Principles for professional ethics. Bethesda, MD: Author.
25.
OchoaS. H.GonzalezD.GalarzaA.GuillemardL. (1996) The training and use of interpreters in bilingual psycho-educational assessment: An alternative in need of study. Diagnostique21: 19–40. doi: 10.1177/073724779602100302.
26.
OchoaS. H.RiccioC.JimenezS.de AlbaR. G.SinesM. (2004) Psychological assessment of English language learners and/or bilingual students: An investigation of school psychologists’ current practices. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment22(3): 185–208. doi: 10.1177/073428290402200301.
PaoneT. R.MalottK. M.MadduxC. (2010) School counselor collaboration with language interpreters: Results of a national survey. Journal of School Counseling8(13): 1–30.
29.
RenX. S.AmickB.ZhouL.GandekB. (1998) Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology51(11): 1129–1138. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00104-8.
30.
RhodesR. L.OchoaS. H.OrtizS. O. (2005) Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
RoggenV. (2014) Expanding the area of classical philology: International words. Nordlit. 33, 321–328. doi: 10.7557/13.3166.
32.
SattlerJ. (2008) Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations, 5th ed. San Diego, CA: Author.
33.
Sattler, J. M., Oades-ese, G. V., Kitzie, M., & Krach, S. K. (2014). Chapter 4: Culturally and linguistic diverse children. In J. Sattler, & R. D. Hogue (Eds.), Assessment of children: Behavioral and clinical applications (4th ed.) (pp. 125–159). San Diego, CA: Author.
34.
Solano-FloresG.TrumbullE.Nelson-BarberS. (2002) Concurrent development of dual language assessments: An alternative to translating tests for linguistic minorities. International Journal of Testing2(2): 107–129. doi: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0202_2.
35.
Sotelo-DynegaM.DixonS. G. (2014) Cognitive assessment practices: A survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools51(10): 1031–1045. doi: 10.1002/pits.21802.
36.
SwenderE. (2003) Oral proficiency testing in the real world: Answers to frequently asked questions. Foreign Language Annals36: 520–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02141.x.
37.
TseL. (1995) Language brokering among Latino adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences17: 180–193. doi: 10.1177/07399863950172003.
38.
US Office of Minority Health (2001) Eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health, Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
39.
Van der VeldeM. E.FeijJ. A.van EmmerikH. (1998) Change in work values and norms among Dutch young adults: Ageing or societal trends?International Journal of Behavioral Development22(1): 55–76. doi: 10.1080/016502598384513.
40.
Van TeijlingenE.HundleyV. (2002) The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard16(40): 33–36. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214.
41.
Van de VijverF. J. R.HambletonR. K. (1996) Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist1(2): 89–99. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89.
42.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1996). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1: Theory and method, (2nd ed.) (pp. 257–300). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
43.
Van de VijverF. J.PoortingaY. H. (1997) Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment13(1): 29–37. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29.
44.
Van de VijverF.TanzerN. K. (2004) Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology54(2): 119–135. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
