Identifying effective instructional practices and effective teachers is an important issue in educational research, policy, and practice. However, many schools have resorted to measuring these constructs with student test scores, ignoring the instructional context. In this introductory article to the special issue, we highlight the importance of the instructional context as facilitating of teacher-student relationships, effective instructional practices, and supporting of student success.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E. (2012) School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology104: 1189–1204. doi:10.1037/a0029356.
2.
CorcoranS. P. (2010) Can teachers be evaluated by their students’ test scores? Should they be? The use of value-added measures of teacher effectiveness in policy and practice, Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
3.
CurbyT. W.Rimm-KaufmanS. E.AbryT. (2013) Do emotional support and classroom organization earlier in the year set the stage for higher quality instruction?Journal of School Psychology51: 557–569. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.06.001.
4.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis and Archives, 8.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (2014) One piece of the whole: Teacher evaluation as part of a comprehensive system for teaching and learning. American Educator38: 4–13.
6.
EhrenM. C.VisscherA. J. (2006) Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies54(1): 51–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 8527.2006.00333.x.
7.
Frelin, A. (2015). Relational underpinnings and professionality – a case study of a teacher's practices involving students with experiences of school failure. School Psychology International, 36(6), 589--604.
8.
HallC.NoyesA. (2009) New regimes of truth: The impact of performative school self evaluation systems on teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education25(6): 850–856. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.008.
9.
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. MET Research Paper. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.metproject.org/downloads/ MET_Gathering_Feedback_Research_Paper.pdf.
10.
Katz, I., & Shahar, B. (2015). What makes a motivating teacher? Teachers’ motivation and beliefs as predictors of their autonomy-supportive style. School Psychology International, 36(6), 575--588.
11.
KoretzD.HamiltonL. S. (2006) Testing for accountability in K-12. In: BrennanR. L. (eds) Educational Measurement, 4th ed). Westport, CT: American Council on Education, pp. 531–578.
12.
LeighA. (2010) Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review29: 480–488. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.010.
13.
Mainhard, T. (2015). Liking a tough teacher: Interpersonal characteristics of teaching and students’ achievement goals. School Psychology International, 36(6), 559--574.
14.
MuñozM. A.ChangF. C. (2007) The elusive relationship between teacher characteristics and student academic growth: A longitudinal multilevel model for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education20: 147–164. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9054-y.
NyeB.KonstantopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2004) How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26: 237–257. doi: 10.3102/01623737026003237.
17.
Ofsted (2015) The common inspection framework: Education, skills and early years, London: HMSO.
18.
Pendergast, L., & Kaplan, A. (2015). Instructional context and student motivation, learning, and development: Commentary and implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36(6), 638--647.
19.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K. (2009) Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observations can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher38: 109–119. doi: 10. 3102/0013189X09332374.
20.
PiantaR. C.La ParoK. M.PayneC.CoxM. J.BradleyR. (2002) The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal102: 225–238. doi: 10.1086/499701.
21.
Putwain, D. W. (2008). Supporting assessment stress in Key Stage 4 students. Educational Studies, 34(2), 83--95. doi:10.1080/03055690701811081.
22.
PutwainD. W.RobertsC. M. (2009) The development of an instrument to measure teachers’ use of fear appeals in the GCSE classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology79: 643–661. doi: 10.1348/000709909X426130.
23.
ReddyL. A.FabianoG.JimersonS. R. (2013) Assessment of general education teachers’ Tier 1 classroom practices: Contemporary science, practice, and policy. School Psychology Quarterly28: 273–276.
24.
ReddyL. A.FabianoG.BarbaraschB.DudekC. (2012) Behavior management ofstudents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders using teacher and student progress monitoring. In: CrothersL. M.KolbertJ. B. (eds) Understanding and managing behaviors of children with psychological disorders: A reference for classroom teachers, New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc, pp. 17–47.
25.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005) Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica73: 417–458. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 0262.2005.00584.x.
26.
SaekiE.PendergastL.SegoolN. K.von der EmbseN. P. (2015) Potential psychosocial and instructional consequences of the common core state standards: Implications for research and practice. Contemporary School Psychology19(2): 89–97.
27.
Symes, W., Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2015). The enabling and protective role of academic buoyancy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to high stakes examinations. School Psychology International, 36(6), 605--619.
28.
SlaterH.DaviesN. M.BurgessS. (2012) Do teachers matter? Measuring the variation in teacher effectiveness in England. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics74(5): 629–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00666.x.
29.
TromanG. (2008) Primary teacher identity, commitment and career in performative school cultures. British Educational Research Journal34(5): 619–633. doi: 10.1080/02680930701541741.
30.
ValliL.BueseD. (2007) The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal44: 519–558. doi: 10.3102/0002831207306859.
31.
von der EmbseN. P.KilgusS. P.BowlerM.SolomonH.CurtissC. (2015) Initial development and factor structure of the Educator Test Stress Inventory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment33(3): 223–237. doi: 10.1177/0734282914548329.
32.
von der Embse, N. P., Schultz, B. K., & Draughn, J. D. (2015). Readying students to test: The influence of fear and efficacy appeals on anxiety and test performance. School Psychology International, 36(6), 620--637.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
