The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a powerful group contingency with a history of documented empirical support. The purpose of this study was to compare two interdependent group contingencies, the GBG and a positive variation, the Caught Being Good Game (CBGG), in a school implementing school-wide positive behavior support. A kindergarten and fourth-grade classroom teacher with 17 and 20 students, respectively, implemented both versions of the game in a counterbalanced fashion. Using a withdrawal design, results showed similar effects on disruptive and on-task behaviors. The CBGG is discussed as an effective variation of the GBG that is acceptable to both teachers and students.
BarrishH.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
2.
BradshawC. P.KothC. W.BevansK. B.IalongoN.LeafP. J. (2008). The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 462–473.
3.
ChitiyoM.WheelerJ. J. (2009). Challenges faced by school teachers in implementing positive behavior support in their school systems. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 58–63.
4.
CoddingR. S.LivanisA.PaceG. M.VacaL. (2008). Using performance feedback to improve treatment integrity of classwide behavior plans: An investigation of observer reactivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 417–422.
DarveauxD. X. (1984). The Good Behavior Game plus merit: Controlling disruptive behavior and improving student motivation. School Psychology Review, 13, 510–514.
7.
DaviesS.WitteR. (2000). Self-management and peer-monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention deficit /hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 135–147.
8.
DullumL. C.JeffreyJ. L.McCurdyB. L. (2009, February). Gotcha! Caught being good game: Classwide intervention to increase on-task behavior. Poster session presented at the National Association of School Psychologists conference, Boston, MA.
9.
EddyJ.M.ReidJ.B.FetrowR.A. (2000). An elementary school-based prevention program targeting modifiable antecedents of youth delinquency and violence: Linking the interests of families and teachers (LIFT). Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 165-176.
10.
FishbeinJ. E.WasikB. H. (1981). Effect of the Good Behavior Game on disruptive library behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 89–93.
11.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.SmolkowskiK.EberL.NakasatoJ.ToddA. W.EsperanzaJ. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144.
12.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT. (2005). Schoolwide positive behavior support. In BambaraL. M.KernL. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York, NY: Guilford.
13.
HuberH. (1979). The value of behavior modification programme, administered in a fourth grade class of remedial school. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 28, 73–79.
14.
IalongoN.PoduskaJ.WerthamerL.KellamS. (2001). The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on conduct problems an disorder in early adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 146-160.
15.
KohnA. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise and other bribes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
LannieA. L.McCurdyB. L. (2007). Preventing disruptive behavior in the urban classroom: The effects of the good behavior game on student and teacher behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 85–98.
17.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliotS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology–Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
18.
McCurdyB. L.LannieA. L.BarnabasE. (2009). Reducing disruptive behavior in an urban school cafeteria: An extension of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 39–54.
19.
McIntoshK.ChardD.BolandJ. B.HornerR. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 146–154.
20.
PoduskaJ. M.KellamS. G.WangW.BrownC. H.IalongoN. S.ToyinboP. (2008). Impact of the Good Behavior Game, a universal classroom-based behavior intervention, on young adult service use for problems with emotions, behavior, or drugs or alcohol. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(Suppl 1), S29-S44.
21.
SaighP. A.UmarA. M. (1983). The effects of a good behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sudanese elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 339–344.
22.
SalendS. J.ReynoldsC. J.CoyleE. M. (1989). Individualizing the Good Behavior Game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108–126.
23.
SugaiG.HornerR. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50.
24.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). The effect of self-evaluation on teaching behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 35, 161–171.
25.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–8.
26.
SwiezyN. B.MatsonJ. L.BoxP. (1992). The good behavior game: A token reinforcement system for preschoolers. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14, 21–32.
27.
TankersleyM. (1995). A group-oriented contingency management program: A review of research on the good behavior game and implications for teachers. Preventing School Failure, 40, 19–24.
28.
TingstromD. H.Sterling-TurnerH. E.WilczynskiS. M. (2006). The Good Behavior Game: 1969–2002. Behavior Modification, 30, 225–253.
29.
TurcoT. L.ElliottS. N. (1986). Students’ acceptability ratings of interventions for classroom misbehaviors: A study of well-behaving and misbehaving youth. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 281–289.
30.
Van LierP. A. C.MuthenB. O.van der SarR. M.CrijnenA. A. M. (2004). Preventing disruptive behavior in elementary school children: Impact of a universal classroom-based intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 467–478.
31.
WolfM. M.HanleyE. L.KingL. A.LachowiczJ.GilesD. K. (1970). The timer-game: A variable interval contingency for the management out-of-seat behavior. Exceptional Children, 37, 113–117.
