Given the visual-spatial nature of American Sign Language (ASL), children acquiring this language may be expected to show facility in recall of spatial-temporal sequences that are arbitrarily ordered. Further, because the language provides experience with spatial-temporal sequences lacking props and themes, language-specific experience may generalize to support recall of non-linguistic sequences lacking these features. To test these suggestions, in two experiments we compared recall performance of preschool-aged English-speaking and ASL-signing children. In Experiment 1, we used elicited imitation in a 2 (language: ASL, English × 2 (prop: present, absent) × 2 (theme: present, absent) × 2 (temporal order: enabling, arbitrary) design. Children acquiring ASL had better recall of arbitrarily ordered prop-supported sequences. Further, children acquiring ASL showed some advantage in recall of sign and non-sign gesture sequences. Experiment 2 directly compared real and nonsense word (or sign) recall between the two groups of children; results suggest some benefit from experience with ASL in processing nonlinguistic visual-spatial gestures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkmajianA.DemersR. A.FarmerA. R.HarnishR. M. (1990). Linguistics, 3rd edn (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
2.
BauerP. J. (1992). Holding it all together: how enabling relations facilitate young children's event recall. Cognitive Development, 7, 1–28.
3.
BauerP. J. (1995). Recalling past events: from infancy to early childhood. Annals of Child Development, 11, 25–71.
4.
BauerP. J.FivushR. (1992). Constructing event representations: building on a foundation of variation and enabling relations. Cognitive Development, 7, 381–401.
5.
BauerP. J.HertsgaardL. A. (1993). Increasing steps in recall of events: factors facilitating immediate and long-term memory in 13.5- and 16.5-month-old children. Child Development, 64, 1204–23.
6.
BauerP. J.HertsgaardL. A.DropikP.DalyB. P. (1998). When even arbitrary order becomes important: developments in reliable temporal sequencing of arbitrarily ordered events. Memory, 6, 165–98.
7.
BauerP. J.HertsgaardL. A.WewerkaS. S. (1995). Effects of experience and reminding on long-term recall in infancy: remembering not to forget. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 260–98.
8.
BauerP. J.ThalD. J. (1990). Scripts or scraps: reconsidering the development of sequential understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 287–304.
9.
BauerP. J.TravisL. (1993). The fabric of an event: different sources of temporal invariance differentially affect 24-month-olds' recall. Cognitive Development, 8, 319–41.
10.
EmmoreyK. (1993). Processing a dynamic visual-spatial language: psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, Special Issue: Sentence Processing: III, 153–87.
11.
EmmoreyK.KosslynS. M.BellugiU. (1993). Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46, 139–81.
12.
FivushR.HamondN. R. (1989). Time and again: effects of repetition and retention interval on 2-year-olds' event recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 259–73.
13.
FivushR.KuebliJ.ClubbP. A. (1992). The structure of events and event representations: a developmental analysis. Child Development, 63, 188–201.
14.
GopnikA.MeltzoffA. (1993). Words and thoughts in infancy: the specificity hypothesis and the development of categorization and naming. Advances in Infancy Research, 8, 217–49.
15.
HudsonJ. A. (1990). Constructive processing in children's event memory. Developmental Psychology, 26, 180–7.
16.
HuntE.AgnoliF. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98, 377–89.
17.
Lillo-MartinD. (1997). The modular effects of Sign Language acquisition. in MarscharkM.SipleP.Lillo-MartinD.CampbellR.EverhartV. S. (eds), Relations of Language and Thought: The View from Sign Language and Deaf Children (New York: Oxford University Press), 62–109.
18.
MacWhinneyB.BatesE.KlieglR. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–50.
19.
MandlerJ. M.McDonoughL. (1995). Long-term recall of event sequences in infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 457–74.
20.
MarshallJ. C. (1986). Signs of language in the brain. Nature, 322, 307–8.
21.
MarshallJ. C. (1987). Introduction: sign aphasia in the context of modern neuropsychology. in PoiznerH.KlimaE. S.BellugiU. (eds), What the Hands Reveal about the Brain (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), xii–xvii.
22.
McDonoughL.MandlerJ. M.McKeeR. D.SquireL. R. (1995). The deferred imitation task as a nonverbal measure of declarative memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 92, 7580–4.
23.
MeltzoffA. N. (1995). What infant memory tells us about infantile amnesia: long-term recall and deferred imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 497–515.
24.
NelsonK. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (1-2, Serial No. 149).
25.
NevilleH. J. (1990). Intermodal competition and compensation in development: evidence from studies of the visual system in congenitally deaf adults. in DiamondA. (ed.), The Development and Neural Bases of Higher Cognitive Function (New York: New York Academy of Sciences Press), 71–91.
26.
NevilleH. J. (1995). Developmental specificity in neurocognitive development in humans. in GazzanigaM. S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
27.
NevilleH. J.LawsonD. (1987 a). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I Normal hearing adults. Brain Research, 405, 253–67.
28.
NevilleH. J.LawsonD. (1987b). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. III Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language. Brain Research, 405, 284–94.
29.
PoiznerH.KlimaE. S.BellugiU. (1987). What the Hands Reveal about the Brain (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
30.
SeraM. D.BergeC. A. H.del Castillo PintadoJ. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9, 261–92.
31.
SiedleckiT.BonvillianJ. D. (1993). Location, handshape and movement: young children's acquisition of the formational aspects of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 78, 31–52.
32.
SlackmanE. A.HudsonJ. A.FivushR. (1986). Actions, actors, links and goals: the structure of children's event representations. in NelsonK. (ed.), Event Knowledge: Structure and Function in Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 47–69.
33.
ValliC.LucasC. (1992). Linguistics of American Sign Language (Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press).
34.
van den BroekP. W. (1997). Discovering the cement of the universe: the development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood. in van den BroekP.BauerP. J.BourgT. (eds) Developmental Spans in Event Representation and Comprehension: Bridging Fictional and Actual Events (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 321–42.
35.
WestT. A.BauerP. J. (1997). Supports for the enabling table: effects of props and narration on preschoolers' recall of event sequences. Unpublished manuscript.
