Karadöller and colleagues propose an interesting analysis of multimodality in spoken and signed language acquisition. In this commentary, we aim to extend the authors’ approach and abandon speech-centred and brainbound perspectives. By considering multimodality as a collage of multiple skills, in which abilities are acquired and exploited with new purposes, we will avoid integrating gestures and signs into pre-existent speech-centred models. This will enable us to move confidently into a future in which embodied dynamic interactions between skills and contexts are analysed in their ability to broaden the child’s world beyond the here and now and mould the language surge.
Boyes BraemP.VolterraV. (2023). Through the sign language glass: Changing and converging views in spoken and signed language research. In JanzenT.ShafferB. (Eds), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (pp. 23–47). de Gruyter Mouton.
2.
BonsignoriC.SparaciL. (2022). Playing for the sake of playing: An enactive account of pretend play in childhood. Rivista di psicolinguistica applicata, 22(2), 31–43.
3.
CapirciO.CaselliM. C.VolterraV. (2022). Interaction among modalities and within development. In MorgensternA.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Gesture in Language: Development Across the Lifespan (pp. 103–133). De Gruyter Mouton; American Psychological Association.
4.
ClarkA. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
5.
ClearfieldM. W. (2011). Learning to walk changes infants’ social interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(1), 15–25.
6.
HenrichJ.HeineS.J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
7.
IversonJ. M. (2022). Developing language in a developing body, revisited: The cascading effects of motor development on the acquisition of language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 13(6), e1626.
8.
KaradöllerD.SümerB.ÖzyürekA. (2025). First language acquisition in a multimodal language framework: insights from speech, gesture and sign. First Language, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237241290678
9.
KarasikL. B.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.AdolphK. E. (2011). Transition from crawling to walking and infants’ actions with objects and people. Child development, 82(4), 1199–1209.
10.
LillardA. S.WitheringtonD. C. (2004). Mothers’ behavior modifications during pretense and their possible signal value for toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 95.
11.
MillikanR. G. (1995). Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical perspectives, 9, 185–200.
12.
MasatakaN. (2003). From Index-finger extension to index-finger pointing: Ontogenesis of pointing in preverbal infants. In KitaS. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 69–109). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
13.
NishidaT. K.LillardA. S. (2007). The informative value of emotional expressions: ‘Social referencing’in mother–child pretense. Developmental Science, 10(2), 205–212.
14.
PizzutoE.PietrandreaP.SimoneR. (Eds.) (2007). Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies. Mouton De Gruyter.
PouwW. T.De NooijerJ. A.Van GogT.ZwaanR. A.PaasF. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 359.
17.
RinaldiP.CaselliM. C.Di RenzoA.GulliT.VolterraV. (2014). Sign vocabulary in deaf toddlers exposed to sign language since birth. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(3), 303–318.
18.
RinaldiP.CaselliM. C.LucioliT.LamanoL.VolterraV. (2018). Sign language skills assessed through a sentence reproduction task. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23(4), 408–421.
19.
SchroerS. E.YuC. (2023). Looking is not enough: Multimodal attention supports the real-time learning of new words. Developmental Science, 26(2), e13290.
20.
SparaciL. (2013). Beyond the point: A basic guide to literature on pointing abilities in children with autism. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 6(24), 177–202.
21.
SparaciL.GallagherS. (2023). A Kaleidoscope of play: A new approach to play analysis in childhood. Philosophical Psychology, 38(2), 718–747.
22.
SparaciL.GallagherS. (2024). Continuity through change: How gestures inform current debates on the ontogeny. In: MaddalenaG.FerrucciF.BellaM.SantarelliM. (Eds.), Gestures: Approaches, Uses, and Developments (pp. 251–271). De Gruyter.
23.
SparaciL.VolterraV. (2017). Hands shaping communication: From gestures to signs. In BertolasoM.Di StefanoN. (Eds.), The Hand and Human Identity: Perception, Cognition, Action (pp. 29–54). Springer.
24.
SpencerJ. P.ClearfieldM.CorbettaD.UlrichB.BuchananP.SchönerG. (2006). Moving toward a grand theory of development: In memory of Esther Thelen. Child Development, 77(6), 1521–1538.
VolterraV.CapirciO.RinaldiP.SparaciL. (2018). From action to spoken and signed language through gesture: Some basic developmental issues for a discussion on the evolution of the human language-ready brain. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 216–238.
27.
VolterraV.IversonJ. M. (1995). When do modality factors affect the course of language acquisition? In EmmoreyK.ReillyJ. (Eds), Language, Gesture, and Space (371–390). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
WestK. L.LeezenbaumN. B.NorthrupJ. B.IversonJ. M. (2019). The relation between walking and language in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Child Development, 90(3), e356–e372.
