Examining the dimensionality of oral discourse language skills in early childhood is crucial in informing theories of language and literacy development. This study examined the factor structure of linguistic and discourse features in oral text production for second graders. A total of 330 English-speaking second graders (Mage = 7.33, 53% boys, 55% White) described three pictures in two discourse conditions. Children’s picture descriptions were transcribed verbatim and coded for a total of nine linguistic (e.g. elaborated noun phrase, clausal density) and discourse features (e.g. proper character introduction, perspective taking). Results from confirmatory factor analysis showed that a two-factor structure consisting of linguistic and discourse features factors provided the best fit to the data. Findings suggested that various linguistic and discourse features in oral text production can be best described as having two related but distinct factors.
AnthonyJ. L.DavisC.WilliamsJ. M.AnthonyT. I. (2014). Preschoolers’ oral language abilities: A multilevel examination of dimensionality. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.004
2.
BarnesA. E.KimY.-S.PhillipsB. M. (2014). The relations of proper character introduction to narrative quality and listening comprehension for young children from high poverty schools. Reading and Writing, 27(7), 1189–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9481-0
3.
BornsteinM. H.HahnC.-S.PutnickD. L. (2016). Stability of core language skill across the first decade of life in children at biological and social risk. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(12), 1434–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12632
4.
BornsteinM. H.HahnC.-S.PutnickD. L.SuwalskyJ. T. D. (2014). Stability of core language skill from early childhood to adolescence: A latent variable approach. Child Development, 85(4), 1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12192
5.
BornsteinM. H.PutnickD. L. (2012). Stability of language in childhood: A multiage, multidomain, multimeasure, and multisource study. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025889
6.
ChoM.KimY.-S. G. (2023). Do second graders adjust their language by discourse context?Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00100
7.
ChoM.KimY.-S. G.OlsonC. B. (2021). Does perspective taking matter for writing? Perspective taking in source-based analytical writing of secondary students. Reading and Writing, 34(8), 2081–2101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10136-7
8.
CollinsA. A.ComptonD. L.LindstromE. R.GilbertJ. K. (2020). Performance variations across reading comprehension assessments: Examining the unique contributions of text, activity, and reader. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09972-5
9.
CurentonS. M.CraigM. J.FlaniganN. (2008). Use of decontextualized talk across story contexts: How oral storytelling and emergent reading can scaffold children’s development. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701839296
10.
CurentonS. M.JusticeL. M. (2004). African American and Caucasian preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language: Literate language features in oral narratives. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/023)
11.
De TempleJ. M.WuH.SnowC. E. (1991). Papa pig just left for pigtown: Children’s oral and written picture descriptions under varying instructions. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544797
12.
DockrellJ. E.MarshallC. R. (2015). Measurement issues: Assessing language skills in young children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12072
13.
EisenbergS. L.UkrainetzT. A.HsuJ. R.KaderavekJ. N.JusticeL. M.GillamR. B. (2008). Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461
14.
EvansJ. (1996). Plotting the complexities of language sample analysis: Linear and nonlinear models of assessment. In DaleP.ThalD.ColeK. (Eds.), Advances in assessment of communication and language (pp. 207–256). Brookes Publishing.
15.
HowardA. A.MayeuxL.NaiglesL. R. (2008). Conversational correlates of children’s acquisition of mental verbs and a theory of mind. First Language, 28(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708091044
16.
KarlsenJ.HjetlandH. N.HagtvetB. E.BraekenJ.Melby-LervågM. (2021). The concurrent and longitudinal relationship between narrative skills and other language skills in children. First Language, 41(5), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723721995688
17.
KimY.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
18.
KimY.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
19.
KimY.-S. G. (2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407
20.
KimY.-S. G. (2023). Oral discourse skills: Dimensionality of comprehension and retell of narrative and expository texts, and the relations of language and cognitive skills to identified dimensions. Child Development, 94, e246–e263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13935
21.
KimY. S. G.DoreR.ChoM.GolinkoffR.AmendumS. J. (2021). Theory of mind, mental state talk, and discourse comprehension: Theory of mind process is more important for narrative comprehension than for informational text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, 105181.
22.
KimY.-S. G.GrahamS. (2022). Expanding the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW): Reading–writing relations, and dynamic relations as a function of measurement/dimensions of written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000564
23.
KimY.-S. G.ParkC.ParkY. (2015). Dimensions of discourse level oral language skills and their relation to reading comprehension and written composition: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9542-7
24.
KimY.-S. G.PetscherY. (2021). Influences of person, text, and assessment factors on text/discourse comprehension in oral language (listening comprehension). Annals of Dyslexia, 71(2), 218–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00208-8
25.
KimY.-S. G.PetscherY.UccelliP.KelceyB. (2020). Academic language and listening comprehension – Two sides of the same coin? An empirical examination of their dimensionality, relations to reading comprehension, and assessment modality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000430
26.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
27.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
28.
Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015a). The dimensionality of language ability in young children. Child Development, 86(6), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12450
29.
Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015b). The dimensionality of Spanish in young Spanish-English dual-language learners. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 58(3), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0266
30.
Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2017). Oral language and listening comprehension: Same or different constructs?Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 60(5), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0039
31.
LobanW. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (NCTE Committee on Research Report No. 18). National Council of Teachers of English. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED128818
32.
LoniganC. J.MilburnT. F. (2017). Identifying the dimensionality of oral language skills of children with typical development in preschool through fifth grade. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 60(8), 2185–2198. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0402
33.
LundineJ. P.McCauleyR. J. (2016). A tutorial on expository discourse: Structure, development, and disorders in children and adolescents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(3), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0130
34.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
MassonniéJ.LlauradoA.SumnerE.DockrellJ. E. (2022). Oral language at school entry: Dimensionality of speaking and listening skills. Oxford Review of Education, 48(6), 743–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.2013189
36.
MetsalaJ. L.SparksE.DavidM.ConradN.DeaconS. H. (2021). What is the best way to characterise the contributions of oral language to reading comprehension: Listening comprehension or individual oral language skills?Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12362
37.
MillerJ.IglesiasA. (2012). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT) (Research Version 2012) [Computer software]. SALT Software.
38.
MilliganK.AstingtonJ. W.DackL. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
39.
MouzakiA.SpyropoulouE.RalliA.AntoniouF.DiamantiV.PapaioannouS. (2020). The dimensionality of oral language ability: Evidence from young Greek children. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 63(8), 2732–2751. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00008
40.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (1998). Mplus. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
41.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 428–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.428
42.
PintoG.TarchiC.Accorti GamannossiB.BigozziL. (2016). Mental state talk in children’s face-to-face and telephone narratives. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.004
43.
ProtopapasA.SimosP. G.SideridisG. D.MouzakiA. (2012). The components of the simple view of reading: A confirmatory factor analysis. Reading Psychology, 33(3), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.507626
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von EyeA.CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage.
SnowC. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
48.
SnowC. E.CancinoH.GonzalezP.ShribergE. (1987). Second language learners’ formal definitions: An oral language correlate of school literacy. Center for Language Education and Research.
49.
SymonsD. K.PetersonC. C.SlaughterV.RocheJ.DoyleE. (2005). Theory of mind and mental state discourse during book reading and story-telling tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004X21080
50.
TomblinJ. B.XuyangZ.WeissA.CattsH.WeismerS. E. (2004). Dimensions of individual differences in communication skills among primary grade children. In RiceM. L.WarrenS. F. (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 53–76). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610881-9
51.
TomblinJ. B.ZhangX. (2006). The dimensionality of language. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 49, 1193–1208. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388
