Closely related Swedish and German both mark information status of referents morphologically, though little is known about its acquisition. This study investigates character introductions in the narratives of 4- and 6-year-old Swedish–German bilinguals (N = 40) in both languages, elicited with MAIN Cat/Dog. We analyse effects of age group, language and animacy (human vs nonhuman characters) on the type of referring expression (indefinite NP and pronoun), as well as effects of language proficiency and exposure on the use of indefinite NPs for each language. We also explore which syntactic constructions indefinite NPs occur in. A significant difference was found between the two age groups, but not between languages. No effect was found of language skills or exposure. Four-year-olds used more pronouns and a lower proportion of indefinite NPs than 6-year-olds. Pronouns were more frequent for the human character than for nonhuman animate characters. Whilst animacy (humanness) promoted the use of pronouns, it did not affect the choice of morphological form for lexical NPs (indefinite/definite). The age groups differed in how indefinite NPs were used. Four-year-olds produced fewer narrative presentations (where a character is introduced as part of a typical story opening, e.g. Once upon a time there was a cat) than 6-year-olds, and more labellings (with only an NP, or a clausal predicative, e.g. That’s a cat). Qualitative analyses suggest that the children’s indefinite NPs in labelling constructions can be both referential (when setting the narrative scene), and type-denoting (when naming referents in individual pictures). Whilst the children’s abilities to introduce story characters develop measurably from 4 to 6 years in Swedish and German, appropriateness of character introductions not only depends on whether an indefinite NP is chosen, but also on the syntactic construction this indefinite NP is used in.
Aksu-KoçA.NicolopoulouA. (2015). Character reference in young children’s narratives: A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua, 155, 62–84.
2.
ÁlvarezE. (2003). Character introduction in two languages: Its development in the stories of a Spanish-English bilingual child age 6;11-10;11. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 227–243.
3.
AndreouM.KnoppE.BongartzC.TsimpliI. M. (2015). Character reference in Greek-German bilingual children’s narratives. EUROSLA Yearbook, 15, 1–40.
ArnoldJ. E. (2008). Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 495–527.
6.
AstingtonJ. W.PelletierJ. (2005). Theory of mind, language, and learning in the early years: Developmental origins of school readiness. In HomerB. D.Tamis-LeMondaC. S. (Eds.), The development of social cognition and communication (pp. 312–352). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BambergM. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24(1), 227–284.
8.
BohnackerU. (1997). Determiner phrases and the debate on functional categories in early child language. Language Acquisition, 6(1), 49–90.
9.
BohnackerU. (2003). Nominal phrases. In JosefssonG.PlatzackC.HåkanssonG. (Eds.), The acquisition of Swedish grammar (pp. 195–260). John Benjamins.
10.
BohnackerU. (2007). The role of input frequency in article acquisition in early child Swedish. In GülzowI.GagarinaN. (Eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept (pp. 51–82). Mouton de Gruyter.
11.
BrownR. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press.
12.
ChenL.LeiJ. (2013). The production of referring expressions in oral narratives of Chinese–English bilingual speakers and monolingual peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(1), 41–55.
13.
ChenL.PanN. (2009). Development of English referring expressions in the narratives of Chinese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 429–445.
14.
ClahsenH.EisenbeissS.VainikkaA. (1994). The seeds of structure: A syntactic analysis of the acquisition of case marking. In HoekstraT.SchwartzB. D. (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). John Benjamins.
15.
ColozzoP.WhitelyC. (2014). Keeping track of characters: Factors affecting referential adequacy in children’s narratives. First Language, 34(2), 155–177.
16.
De CatC. (2013). Egocentric definiteness errors and perspective evaluation in preschool children. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 58–69.
17.
De CatC. (2015). The cognitive underpinnings of referential abilities. In SerratriceL.AllenS. E. M. (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 263–283). John Benjamins.
18.
EisenbeissS. (2000). The acquisition of the determiner phrase in German child language. In FriedemannM.-A.RizziL. (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 26–62). Longman.
19.
EisenbeissS. (2002). Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb: Eine Untersuchung zum Erwerb der Struktur und Flexion der Nominalphrase [Feature-driven acquisition of grammar: A study of the acquisition of NP structure and nominal inflection] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf.
20.
EmslieH. C.StevensonR. J. (1981). Pre-school children’s use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language, 8(2), 313–328.
21.
FinnstedtL. (2013). Referentiell kohesion och temporal förankring i barns narrativer: Jämförelse mellan enspråkiga svensktalande och flerspråkiga engelsk-svensktalande barn [Referential cohesion and temporal anchoring in children’s narratives: A comparison of monolingual Swedish-speaking and multilingual English-Swedish-speaking children] [Unpublished MA thesis]. Uppsala University, Uppsala.
22.
GagarinaN.KlopD.KunnariS.TanteleK.VälimaaT.BalčiūnienėI.BohnackerU.WaltersJ. (2012). MAIN: Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 56, 1–140.
23.
GagarinaN.KlopD.KunnariS.TanteleK.VälimaaT.BalčiūnienėI.BohnackerU.WaltersJ. (2015). Assessment of narrative abilities in bilingual children. In Armon-LotemS.de JongJ.MeirN. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 243–269). Multilingual Matters.
24.
GagarinaN.KlopD.KunnariS.TanteleK.VälimaaT.BohnackerU.WaltersJ. (2019). MAIN: Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. Revised version. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 63.
25.
GathercoleV. C. M.ThomasE. M.RobertsE. J.HughesC. O.HughesE. K. (2013). Why assessment needs to take exposure into account: Vocabulary and grammatical abilities in bilingual children. In GathercoleV. C. M. (Ed.), Issues in the assessment of bilinguals (pp. 20–55). Multilingual Matters.
26.
GivónT. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. John Benjamins.
27.
GundelJ. K. (2010). Reference and accessibility from a givenness hierarchy perspective. International Review of Pragmatics, 2(2), 148–168.
28.
GundelJ. K.HedbergN.ZacharskiR. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307.
29.
GundelJ. K.JohnsonK. (2013). Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57.
30.
HamanE.ŁuniewskaM.PomiechowskaB. (2015). Designing cross-linguistic lexical tasks (CLTs) for bilingual preschool children. In Armon-LotemS.de JongJ.MeirN. (Eds.), Methods for assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 196–239). Multilingual Matters.
31.
HelbigG.BuschaJ. (2001). Deutsche Grammatik [German grammar]. Langenscheidt.
32.
HickmannM.HendriksH.RolandF.LiangJ. (1996). The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23(3), 591–619.
33.
HickmannM.SchimkeS.ColonnaS. (2015). From early to late mastery of reference: Multifunctionality and linguistic diversity. In SerratriceL.AllenS. E. M. (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 181–211). John Benjamins.
34.
JiaR.ParadisJ. (2015). The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 737–752.
35.
KailM.HickmannM. (1992). French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12(34), 73–94.
36.
KailM.SanchezyLopezI. (1997). Referent introductions in Spanish narratives as a function of contextual constraints: A crosslinguistic perspective. First Language, 17(51), 103–130.
37.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge University Press.
38.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1981). The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In DeutschW. (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 121–148). Academic Press.
39.
KüntayA. C. (2002). Development of the expression of indefiniteness: Presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes, 33(1), 77–101.
40.
KupischT. (2006). The acquisition of determiners in bilingual German-Italian and German-French children. Lincom.
41.
KupischT.AnderssenM.BohnackerU.SnapeN. (2009). Article acquisition in German, English, Norwegian and Swedish. In LeowW.CamposH.LardiereD. (Eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and acquisition (pp. 223–235). Georgetown University Press.
42.
LindgrenJ. (2018a). Developing narrative competence: Swedish, Swedish-German and Swedish-Turkish children aged 4–6. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
43.
LindgrenJ. (2018b). Effects of age and stimulus material on character introductions of Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 45(2), 526–540.
44.
LindgrenJ.VogelsJ. (2018). Referential cohesion in Swedish preschool children’s narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 45–62.
45.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Transcription format and programs. Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
MaratsosM. P. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
47.
McGannW.SchwartzA. (1988). Main character in children’s narratives. Linguistics, 26(2), 215–234.
48.
ReichardtV. (2014). Wie führen Kinder Referenten ein? Eine Untersuchung der Verwendung deutscher Indefinita durch russisch-deutsch bilinguale Kinder verschiedener Altersgruppen [How do children introduce referents? A study of the use of German indefinites by Russian–German bilingual children in different age groups] [Unpublished BA thesis]. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin.
49.
ReichardtV. (2016). Det var en gång en hund. Eine Untersuchung der Verwendung angemessener referentieller Ausdrücke zur Einführung von Referenten in Narrativen durch deutsch-schwedisch bilinguale Kinder im Alter von 4 und 6 Jahren [Once upon a time, there was a dog. A study of the use of appropriate referring expressions to introduce referents in German–Swedish bilingual children aged 4 and 6] [Unpublished MA thesis]. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin.
SchneiderP.HaywardD. (2010). Who does what to whom: Introduction of referents in children’s storytelling from pictures. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(4), 459–473.
52.
SerratriceL. (2000). The emergence of functional categories in bilingual first language acquisition [PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
53.
SerratriceL. (2007). Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English-Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1058–1087.
54.
SerratriceL.AllenS. E. M. (2015). Introduction: An overview of the acquisition of reference. In SerratriceL.AllenS. E. M. (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins.
55.
SerratriceL.De CatC. (2020). Individual differences in the production of referential expressions: The effect of language proficiency, language exposure and executive function in bilingual and monolingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 371–386.
56.
StrömqvistS.DayD. (1993). On the development of narrative structure in child L1 and adult L2 acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(2), 135–158.
57.
TelemanU.HellbergS.AnderssonE. (Eds.). (1999). Svenska Akademiens Grammatik [Grammar of the Swedish Academy]. Norstedts Ordbok.
58.
ThomasM. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(3), 335–355.
59.
ThordardottirE. (2014). The typical development of simultaneous bilinguals: Vocabulary, morphosyntax and language processing in two age groups of Montreal preschoolers. In GrüterT.ParadisJ. (Eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development (pp. 141–161). John Benjamins.
60.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
61.
TopajN. (2010). Topical referential expressions in narratives of Russian-German bilingual children. In ChiniM. (Ed.), Topic, information structure and language acquisition (pp. 59–72). Franco Angeli.
62.
UnsworthS. (2013). Current issues in multilingual first language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 21–50.
63.
WardenD. A. (1976). The influence of context on children’s use of identifying expression and references. British Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 101–112.
64.
WhitelyC.ColozzoP. (2013). Who’s who? Memory updating and character reference in children’s narratives. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(5), 1625–1636.
65.
WigglesworthG. (1990). Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language, 10(29), 105–125.
66.
WongA. M.-Y.JohnstonJ. R. (2004). The development of discourse referencing in Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 633–660.
