This study investigates negative feedback effects on inflectional morphology acquisition in Russian. In order to examine the effects of adult feedback on child error elimination and assess the lasting effect of feedback, a series of elicited tasks was conducted with 65 Russian children aged from 3 to 4 years. Twelve verbs which undergo overregularization in the non-past tense resulting from applying the yod /j/-pattern were used as stimuli. The experiment was repeated over four sessions with bi-weekly intervals between sessions 1, 2, 3 and a four-week interval between sessions 3 and 4. Four groups of participants were formed with three types of feedback (Correction, Clarification Question and Repetition), and a control group without feedback. No significant differences were observed between groups with different feedback types, or even without feedback. This finding supports the general hypothesis that negative feedback is not a strong driver of recovery from overregularization errors in verb acquisition.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
2.
BerwickR. C.PietroskiP.YankamaB.ChomskyN. (2011). Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207–1242.
3.
BowermanM. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In HawkinsJ. (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73–101). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
4.
BrownR.HanlonC. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In HayesJ. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). New York, NY: Wiley.
5.
CeytlinS. N. (2009). Ocherki po slovoobrazovaniju i formoobrazovaniju v detskoj rechi [Essays on word formation and inflection in child speech]. Moskva, Russia: Znak.
6.
ChernigovskayaT.GorK. (2000). The complexity of paradigm and input frequencies in native and second language verbal processing: Evidence from Russian. Language and Language Behavior, 3, 20–37.
7.
ChomskyN. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
8.
ChouinardM. M.ClarkE. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30, 637–669.
9.
ClahsenH.AveledoF.RocaI. (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29, 591–622.
10.
ClarkE. V.ChouinardM. M. (2000). Énoncés enfantins et reformulations adultes dans l’acquisition du langage. Langages, 140, 9–23.
11.
DemetrasM. J.PostK. N.SnowC. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275–292.
12.
FarrarM. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28, 90–98.
13.
GoldE. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–474.
14.
GorK.ChernigovskayaT. (2001). Rules in the processing of Russian verbal morphology. In ZybatowG.JunghannsU.MelhornG.SzucsichL. (Eds.), Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics (pp. 528–536). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
15.
GorK.ChernigovskayaT. (2004). Generation of complex verbal morphology in first and second language acquisition: Evidence from Russian. In DahlA.SvenoniusP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. Nordlyd, 31 (6), Supplement (pp. 819–833). Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø.
16.
HauserM. D.ChomskyN.FitchW. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579.
17.
Hirsh-PasekK.TreimanR.SchneidermanM. (1984). Brown & Hanlon revisited: Mothers’ sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language, 11, 81–88.
18.
JakobsonR. (1948). Russian conjugation. Word, 4, 155–167.
19.
KharchenkoV. K. (2012). Korpus detskih vyskazyvanij [Corpus of children’s utterances]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel’stvo Literaturnogo Instituta imeni A.M. Gor’kogo.
20.
KulinichE.RoyleP.ValoisD. (2016). Palatalization in the Russian verb system: A psycholinguistic study. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 24, 337–357.
21.
LegateJ. A.YangC. D. (2002). Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty argument. Linguistic Review, 19, 151–162.
22.
LyashevskayaO.SharovS. (2009). Chastotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (na materialah Nacional’nogo korpusa russkogo jazyka) [The frequency dictionary of modern Russian based on Russian National Corpus]. Moskva, Russia: Azbukovnik.
23.
LysterR.SaitoK. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
24.
MarcusG. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46, 53–85.
25.
MarcusG. F.PinkerS.UllmanM.HollanderM.RosenT. J.XuF. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 1–182.
26.
McNeilD. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In SmithF.MillerG. (Eds.), The genesis of language (pp. 15–84). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
MorganJ. L.BonamoK. M.TravisL. L. (1995). Negative evidence on negative evidence. Developmental Psychology, 31, 180–197.
28.
NicholasH.LightbownP. M.SpadaN. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.
29.
PinkerS. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
PinkerS. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
PinkerS. (1995). Why the child holded the baby rabbit: A case study in language acquisition. In GleitmanL. R.LibermanM. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science. Vol. 1: Language (pp. 107–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
PinkerS. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
PullumG. K.ScholzB. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguistic Review, 19, 9–50.
34.
RoyleP. (2007). Variable effects of morphology and frequency on inflection patterns in French preschoolers. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 103–125.
35.
RoyleP.BeritognoloG.BergeronE. (2012). Regularity, sub-regularity and irregularity in French acquisition. In van der AuweraJ.StolzT.UrdzeA.OtsukaH. (Eds.), Irregularity in morphology (and beyond) (pp. 227–250). Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag.
36.
SaxtonM. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139–161.
37.
SaxtonM. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language, 20, 221–252.
38.
SaxtonM.BackleyP.GallawayC. (2005a). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language, 32, 643–672.
39.
SaxtonM.Houston-PriceC.DawsonN. (2005b). The prompt hypothesis: Clarification requests as corrective input for grammatical errors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 393–414.
40.
SaxtonM.KulcsarB.MarshallG.RupraM. (1998). Longer-term effects of corrective input: An experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25, 701–721.
41.
SayT.ClahsenH. (2002). Words, rules and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In NooteboomS.WeermanF.WijnenF. (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 93–129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
42.
ScholzB. C.PullumG. K. (2002). Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism. Linguistic Review, 19, 185–223.
43.
SlobinD. I. (2014). Before the beginning: The development of tools of the trade. Journal of Child Language, 41, 1–17.
44.
ValianV. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40, 21–82.
45.
ValianV. (1999). Input and language acquisition. In RitchieW. C.BhatiaT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 497–530). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46.
ValianV.CaseyL. (2003). Young children’s acquisition of wh-questions: The role of structured input. Journal of Child Language, 30, 117–143.
47.
YangC. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
YangC. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
ZaliznjakA. A. (2003). Grammaticheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Grammar dictionary of the Russian language]. Moskva, Russia: Russkie slovari (Original work published 1977).
