The study was designed to investigate pragmatic development and the ability to make comments/questions on social and non-social topics in Italian-speaking children aged 18–47 months. Parents of 190 children completed an adaptation of the Language Use Inventory into Italian. Overall, the children’s performance on the subscales of the LUI-Italian investigating verbal communication increased, while the score on gestural subscales, with both an imperative and a declarative function, decreased with age. Specific analyses of comments and questions about things, self and other people showed specific age-related differences. No main gender effect was found, but an interaction of gender × age group is discussed. The article concludes with limitations and guidelines for future research.
AngeleriR.AirentiG. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 133–146.
2.
ArielM. (2010). Defining pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BatesE. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, NY: Academy Press.
4.
BellagambaF.LaghiF.LonigroA.PaceC. (2012). Re-enactment of intended acts from a video presentation by 18- and 24-mont-old children. Cognitive Processing, 13, 381–386.
5.
Ben-YizhakN.YirmiyaN.SeidmanI.AlonR.LordC.SigmanM. (2011). Pragmatic language and school related linguistic abilities in siblings of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 750–760.
6.
BonifacioS.GirolamettoL.BulliganM.CallegariM.VignolaS.ZocconiE. (2007). Assertive and responsive conversational skills of Italian-speaking late talkers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 607–623.
7.
BornsteinM. H.HahnC. S.HaynesO. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24, 267–304.
8.
BouchardC.TrudeauN.SuttonA.BoudreaultM. C.DeneaultJ. (2009). Gender differences in language development in French Canadian children between 8 and 30 months of age. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 685–707.
9.
CapirciO.VolterraV. (2008). Gesture and speech: The emergence and development of a strong and changing partnership. Gesture, 8, 22–44.
10.
ClarkE. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CocquytM.MommaertsM. Y.DewartH.ZinkI. (2015). Measuring pragmatic skills: Early detection of infants at risk for communication problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50, 646–658.
12.
DavidA.WeiL. (2008). Individual differences in the lexical development of French-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11, 598–618.
13.
DaviesC.Andrés-RoquetaC.NorburyC. F. (2016). Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with specific language impairment: A pragmatic tolerance account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 98–113.
14.
DaviesC.KatsosN. (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations?Lingua, 120, 1956–1972.
15.
DrummE.BrysonS.ZwaigenbaumL.BrianJ. (2015). Language-related abilities in ‘unaffected’ school-aged siblings of children with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 18, 83–96.
16.
ErikssonM.MarschikP. B.TulvisteT.AlmgrenM.PereiraM. P.WehbergS.… GallegoC. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills: Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 326–343.
FernandezC. (2013). Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development. First Language, 33, 20–46.
19.
FerstlE. C.NeumannJ.BoglerC.von CramonD. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 581–593.
20.
GuidettiM.NicoladisE. (2008). Introduction to special issues: Gestures and communicative development. First Language, 28, 107–115.
21.
HuangY. (2007). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IversonJ. M.CapirciO.CaselliM. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development, 9, 23–43.
24.
IversonJ. M.FaganM. K. (2004). Infant vocal-motor coordination: Precursor to the gesture-speech system?Child Development, 75, 1053–1066.
25.
KimS. H.JunkerD.LordC. (2014). Observation of spontaneous expressive language (OSEL): A new measure for spontaneous and expressive language of children with autism spectrum disorders and other communication disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 3230–3244.
26.
KimS. H.PaulR.Tager-FlusbergH.LordC. (2014). Language and communication in autism. In VolkmarF.PaulR.KlinA. (Eds.), Handbook on autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 230–262). New York, NY: Wiley.
27.
KüntayA.NakamuraK.Ateş-ŞenA. B. (2014). Crosslinguistic and crosscultural approaches to pragmatic development. In MatthewsD. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 317–342). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
28.
LarranagaP.Guijarro-FuentesP. (2012). Clitics in L1 bilingual acquisition. First Language, 32, 151–175.
29.
LongobardiE.LaghiF. (2013). Language Use Inventory Italian version (LUI-Italian) (Unpublished manuscript).
30.
LongobardiE.Rossi-ArnaudC.SpataroP. (2011). Longitudinal examination of early communicative development: Evidence from a parent report questionnaire. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 572–592.
31.
LongobardiE.Rossi-ArnaudC.SpataroP. (2012). Individual differences in the prevalence of words and gestures in the second year of life: Developmental trends in Italian children. Infant Behavior & Development, 35, 847–859.
32.
LoukusaS.RyderN.LeinonenE. (2008). Answering questions and explaining answers: A study of Finnish-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 219–241.
33.
MarcosH. (1995). Mother–child and father–child communication in the second year: A functional approach. Early Development and Parenting, 2, 49–61.
34.
MarcosH. (2001). Introduction: Early pragmatic development. First Language, 21, 209–218.
35.
MartinG. E.LoshM.EstigarribiaB.SiderisJ.RobertsJ. (2013). Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 432–443.
36.
MeltzoffA. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838–850.
37.
MillerM.YoungG. S.HutmanT.JohnsonS.SchwichtenbergA. J.OzonoffS. (2015). Early pragmatic language difficulties in siblings of children with autism: Implications for DSM-5 social communication disorder?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 774–781.
38.
MorisseauT.DaviesC.MatthewsD. (2013). How do 3- and 5-year-olds respond to under- and over-informative utterances?Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 26–39.
39.
MummeD. L.FernaldA. (2003). The infant as onlooker: Learning from emotional reactions observed in a television scenario. Child Development, 74, 221–237.
40.
NinioA.SnowC. E. (1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41.
O’NeillD. K. (2007). The Language Use Inventory for young children: A parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 214–228.
42.
O’NeillD. K. (2009). Language Use Inventory: An assessment of young children’s pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children [Manual and Inventory]. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Knowledge in Development.
43.
O’NeillD. K. (2012). Components of pragmatic ability and children’s pragmatic language development. In SchmidH. J. (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 261–290). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
44.
PearsonB.FernandezS. C.LewedegV.OllerK. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.
45.
RecchiaH. E.HoweN.RossH. S.AlexanderS. (2010). Children’s understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 255–274.
46.
RoweM. L.ÖzçaliskanS.Goldin-MeadowS. (2008). Learning words by hand: Gesture’s role in predicting vocabulary development. First Language, 28, 182–199.
47.
RyckebuschC.MarcosH. (2004). Speech acts and context in young children: Influence of parent gender and type of play from 1;5 to 2;3. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 883–897.
48.
RyderN.LeinonenE. (2003). Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 397–415.
49.
SalomoD.LievenE.TomaselloM. (2013). Children’s ability to answer different types of questions. Journal of Child Language, 40, 469–491.
50.
SerratriceL.SoraceA.PaoliS. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and things in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 70, 183–205.
51.
StrianoT.VaishA. (2006). Seven- to 9-month-old infants use facial expression to interpret others’ actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 753–760.
52.
TomaselloM. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53.
TomaselloM.Conti-RamsdenG.EwertB. (1990). Young children’s conversations with their mothers and fathers: Differences in breakdown and repair. Journal of Child Language, 17, 115–130.
54.
Van HerwegenJ.DimitriouD.RundbladG. (2013). Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1300–1311.
55.
VenezianoE. (Guest Editor). (2010). Special issue on conversation in language development and use. First Language, 30, 241–534.
56.
WoodwardA. L. (2003). Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and object. Developmental Science, 6, 297–311.
57.
WoodwardA. L.GuajardoJ. J. (2002). Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed action. Cognitive Development, 17, 1061–1084.
58.
YowW. Q.MarkmanE. M. (2015). A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker’s referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 391–399.
