Speakers must command different linguistic registers to index various social-discourse elements, including the identity of the addressee. Previous work found that English-learning children could link registers to appropriate addressees by 5 years. Two experiments found that better cues to the linguistic form or to the social meaning of register could improve 3-year-old children’s ability to access their knowledge of register. Experiment 1 contrasted children acquiring English and Spanish, as Spanish provides more consistent grammatical cues to register through its pronoun system than English does. The Spanish-learning children showed earlier success in a forced-choice comprehension task. Experiment 2 provided English-learning children with enhanced cues to register’s social meaning and also found improved performance. These results suggest that the underlying knowledge about register is available from an early age, but can be accessed only with sufficiently strong cues.
AndersenE. S. (1992). Speaking with style. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AndersenE. S.BrizuelaM.DuPuyB.GonnermanL. (1999). Cross-linguistic evidence for the early acquisition of discourse markers as register variables. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1339–1351.
3.
ArmstrongS.GleitmanL. RGleitmanH. (1983). On what some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 263–308.
4.
BaroniM. R.AxiaG. (1989). Children’s meta-pragmatic abilities and the identification of polite and impolite requests. First Language, 9, 285–297.
5.
BatesE.MacWhinneyB.CaselliC.DevescoviA.NataleF.VenzaV. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–354.
6.
BatesE.SilvernL. (1977). Social adjustment and politeness in preschoolers. The Journal of Communication, 27, 104–111.
7.
BellA. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204.
8.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrownR. (1996). The language of social relationship. In SlobinD. IGerhardtJ.KyratzisA.GuoJ (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 39–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
BrownR.GilmanA. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In SebeokT. A. (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
ButtJ.BenjaminC. (2000). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. Chicago, IL: NTC Publishing Group.
12.
CandanA.KüntayA. C.YehY.CheungH.WagnerL.NaiglesL. R. (2012). Language and age effects in children’s processing of word order. Cognitive Development, 27, 205–221.
13.
DurkinK.NugentB. (1998). Kindergarten children’s gender-role expectations for television actors. Sex Roles, 38, 387–402.
14.
FernaldA. (1992). Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. In BarkowJ. HCosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391–428). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
GilesH.CouplandN.CouplandJ. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In GilesH.CouplandNCouplandJ. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GrinsteadJ. (2000). Case, inflection and subject licensing in child Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 27, 119–155.
17.
HoffE. (2010). Context effects on young children’s language use: The influence of conversational setting and partner. First Language, 30, 461–472.
18.
KinzlerK. D.DupouxE.SpelkeE. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 12577–12580.
19.
KyratzisA.MarxT.WadeE. R. (2001). Pre-schoolers’ communicative competence: Register shift in the marking of power in different contexts of friendship group talk. First Language, 21, 287–429.
20.
LabovW. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
NakamuraK. (2001). The acquisition of polite language by Japanese children. In NelsonK. EAksu-KoçA.JohnsonC. E (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol. 10, pp. 93–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
NippoldM. A.LeonardL. B.AnastopoulosA. (1982). Development in the use and understanding of polite forms in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 193–202.
23.
ParadisJ.NavarroS. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input?Journal of Child Language, 30, 371–394.
24.
PedlowR.SansonA.WalesR. (2004). Children’s production and comprehension of politeness in requests: Relationships to behavioural adjustment, temperament, and empathy. First Language, 24, 347–367.
25.
ShatzM.GelmanR. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children and a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–38.
26.
SlobinD. I.BeverT. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265.
27.
WagnerL.Greene-HavasM.GillespieR. (2010). Development in children’s comprehension of linguistic register. Child Development, 81, 1678–1685.
28.
WeeksT. E. (1971). Speech registers in young children. Child Development, 42, 1119–1131.
