This study investigates prosodic (noun length) and lexical-semantic (animacy) influences on determiner use in the spontaneous speech of three children acquiring French, Austrian German and Dutch. In support of typological and language-specific hypotheses from the Germanic–Romance contrast, an advantage of monosyllabic nouns and of inanimate nouns for taking a determiner or filler was found in French, but not in Austrian German or Dutch. The authors discuss the possible contributory role of these factors on determiner acquisition from a cross-linguistic perspective, also accounting for more specific differences between Austrian German and Dutch.
AllenG. D.HawkinsS. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In Yeni-KomshianG.KavanaghJ. S.FergusonC. A. (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 227–256). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AllenS.SkarabelaB.HughesM. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In BehrensH. (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research (pp. 99–137). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
3.
AnderssenM. (2005). The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian (PhD dissertation). University of Tromsø, Norway.
4.
BassanoD. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between the lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27, 521–559.
5.
BassanoD.MaillochonI.Korecky-KröllK.van DijkM.LaahaS.DresslerW. U.van GeertP. (2011). A comparative and dynamic approach to the development of determiner use in three children acquiring different languages. First Language, 31, 253–279.
6.
BassanoD.MaillochonI.MottetS. (2008). Noun grammaticalization and determiner use in French children’s speech: A gradual development with prosodic and lexical influences. Journal of Child Language, 35, 403–438.
7.
BatesE.GoodmanJ. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinneyB. (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 29–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
BohnackerU. (1997). Determiner phrases and the debate on functional categories in early child language. Language Acquisition, 6, 49–90.
9.
BooijG. E. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
10.
ChierchiaG. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.
11.
ComrieB. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
DemuthK. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In WeissenbornJ.HöhleB. (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping (Vol. II, pp. 3–21). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
13.
DemuthK. (2011). The acquisition of phonology. In GoldsmithJ.RiggleJ.YuA. (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 571–595). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
DemuthK.PatroliaM.SongJ. Y.MasapolloM. (2012). The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language, 32, 17–37.
15.
DemuthK.TremblayA. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127.
16.
EisenbeissS. (2002). Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb: Eine Untersuchung zum Erverb der Struktur und Flexion der Nominalphrase (PhD dissertation). Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Germany.
17.
EromsH. W. (1989). Regionalsprachliche Artikelparadigmen und die grammatikalische Behandlung der Artikel im Deutschen. In EromsH. W. (Ed.), Probleme regionaler Sprachen (pp. 103–123). Hamburg, Germany: Buske.
18.
EwenC. J.Van der HulstH. (2001). The phonological structure of words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GerkenL. A. (1994). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–584.
20.
GerkenL. A. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 72, 683–712.
21.
GerkenL. A.McIntoshB. J. (1993). The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448–457.
22.
GillisS.de HouwerA. (Eds.). (1998). The acquisition of Dutch. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
23.
GoadH.BuckleyM. (2006). Prosodic structure in child French: Evidence for the Foot. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 109–142.
24.
GuastiM. T.De LangeJ.GavarroA.CaprinC. (2008). Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition, 15, 89–119.
25.
Kilani-SchochM.DresslerW. U. (2005). Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
26.
Korecky-KröllK.DresslerW. U. (2009). The acquisition of number and case in Austrian German nouns. In StephanyU.VoeikovaM. D. (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 265–302). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
KupischT. (2006). The acquisition of determiners in bilingual German-Italian and German-French children. Munich, Germany: Lincom Europa.
28.
KupischT. (2008). Determinative, Individual- und Massennomen im Spracherwerb des Deutschen: Diskussion des Nominal Mapping Parameters. Linguistische Berichte, 214, 129–160.
29.
KupischT.AnderssenM.BohnackerU.SnapeN. (2009). Article acquisition in English, German, Norwegian and Swedish. In LeowR. W.CamposH.LardiereD. (Eds.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (GURT) 2007 proceedings (pp. 223–235). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30.
LievenE.TomaselloM. (2008). Children first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In RobinsonP.EllisN. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–195). London: Routledge.
31.
LleóC. (1997). Filler syllables, proto-articles and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In SoraceA.HeycockC.ShillcockR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA 1997 conference on language acquisition: Knowledge, representation, and processing (pp. 251–256). Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.
32.
LleóC. (2001). The interface of phonology and syntax: The emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In WeissenbornJ.HöhleB. (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping (Vol. II, pp. 23–44). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
33.
LleóC.DemuthC. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Cross-linguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In GreenhillA.LittlefieldH.TanoC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University conference on child language development (pp. 407–418). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
34.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
MajoranoM.D’OdoricoL. (2011). The transition into ambient language: A longitudinal study of babbling and first word production of Italian children. First Language, 31, 47–66.
36.
MüllerA.HöhleB.SchmitzM.WeissenbornJ. (2009). Information structural constraints on children’s early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (‘also’) in German-learning 12- to 36-month-olds. First Language, 29, 373–399.
37.
PennerZ.WeissenbornJ. (1996). Strong continuity, parameter setting and the trigger hierarchy: On the acquisition of the DP in Bernese Swiss German and High German. In ClahsenH. (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 161–200). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
38.
PetersA. (2001). Filler syllables: What is their status in emergent grammar?Journal of Child Language, 28, 229–242.
39.
PineJ. M.LievenE. (1997). Slot and frames patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 123–138.
40.
RoodenburgJ. (2004). French bare arguments are not extinct: The case of coordinated bare nouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 301–313.
41.
RozendaalM. I.BakerA. E. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35, 773–807.
42.
RuhligN.BittnerD. (2013). Introduction. In BittnerD.RuhligN. (Eds.), Lexical bootstrapping: The role of lexis and semantics in child language development (pp. 3–14). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
43.
Saaristo-HelinK.KunnariS.Savinainen-MakkonenT. (2011). Phonological development in children learning Finnish: A review. First Language, 31, 342–363.
44.
TaelmanH.DurieuxG.GillisS. (2008). Fillers as signs of distributional learning. Journal of Child Language, 35, 1–31.
45.
Van der VeldeM. (2004). L’acquisition des articles définis en L1: Une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais. AILE, 21, 9–46.
46.
VenezianoE.SinclairH. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500.
47.
VihmanM. M.DePaolisR. A.DavisB. L. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from English and French. Child Development, 69, 935–949.
48.
VihmanM. M.NakaiS.DePaolisR. A.HalléP. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 336–353.
49.
WieseR. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
50.
WiesingerP. (2008). Das österreichische Deutsch in Gegenwart und Geschichte (2nd ed.). Vienna, Austria: LIT Verlag.
