The present study examines the respective roles of determiners and noun endings in four to ten-year-old French children’s gender attribution choices. In the context of an elicited production task, participants were introduced with determiner–noun pairs where the gender form of the article and the probabilistic gender value of noun suffixes were discordant. Results showed that suffix-congruent choices were never above chance: they were far below chance in the case of feminine suffixes and either below or at chance in the case of masculine suffixes. Results are discussed with respect to a well-known phonological scenario for French gender acquisition and with respect to the masculine as default strategy recently put forth by Boloh and Ibernon (2010).
BassanoD.EmeP. E.ChampaudC. (2005). A naturalistic study of early lexical development: General processes and inter-individual variations in French children. First Language, 25, 67–101.
2.
BolohY.IbernonL. (2010). Gender attribution and gender agreement in 4- to 10-year-old French children. Cognitive Development, 25, 1–25.
3.
BolohY.IbernonL.RoyerS.EscudierF.DanillonA. (2009). Gender attribution and gender agreement in French Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1523–1540.
4.
BraineM. D. S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes: A step toward an acquisition theory. In MacWhinneyB. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 65–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BrooksP. J.BraineM. D. S.CatalanoL.BrodyR. E.SudhalterV. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 79–95.
6.
CarrollS. (1989). Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning, 39, 535–594.
7.
CarrollS. (1995). The hidden dangers of computer modelling: Remarks on Sokolik and Smith’s connectionist learning model of French gender. Second Language Research, 11(3), 193–205.
8.
CorbettG. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
FrigoL.McDonaldJ. L. (1998). Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 218–245.
10.
HockettC. F. (1958). Two models of grammatical description. Word: Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 1945–1985. New York: International Linguistic Association.
11.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Karmiloff-SmithA.GrantJ.BerthoudI.DaviesM.HowlinP.UdwinO. (1997). Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is ‘intact’?Child Development, 68, 274–290.
13.
Le Robert Junior Illustré (1999). Edition CD-ROM. Paris: Bureau van Dijk.
14.
LysterR. (2006). Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. French Language Studies, 16, 69–92.
15.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The Childes Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
MarksonL.BloomP. (1997). Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature, 385, 813–815.
17.
NewB.BrysbaertM.VeronisJ.PallierC. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677.
18.
NewB.PallierC.FerrandL.MatosR. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462. Retrieved from http://www.lexique.org
19.
Pereiz-PereiraM. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–590.
20.
Rey-DeboveJ.ReyA. (Eds.) (1993). Le Nouveau Petit Robert. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.
21.
RocaI. M. (1989). The organisation of grammatical gender. Transactions of the Philological Society, 87, 1–32.
22.
RondalJ. A. (1985). Adult-child interaction and the process of language understanding. New York: Praeger.
23.
RondalJ. A.BacheletJ. F.PereeF. (1985). Analyse du langage et des interactions verbales adulte-enfant. Bulletin d’Audiophonologie, 5, 5–6, 507–535.
24.
SéguinH. (1969). Les marques du genre dans le lexique français écrit contemporain: Compilation des cas et essai de classement. Montréal, Québec: Mémoire de DES, Département de Linguistique, Université de Montréal.
25.
SuppesP.SmithR.LéveilléM. (1973). The French syntax of a child’s noun phrases. Archives de Psychologie, 42(166), 207–269.
26.
ThomasE. M.GathercoleV. C. M. (2007). Children’s productive command of grammatical gender and mutation in Welsh: An alternative to rule-based learning. First Language, 27, 251–278.
27.
TuckerG. R.LambertW. E.RigaultA. A. (1977). The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
28.
Van HeugtenM.ShiR. (2009). French-learning toddlers use gender information on determiners during word recognition. Developmental Science, 12(3), 419–425.
