Studies of English and French show that children’s first articles are more likely to appear when they can be prosodified as part of a disyllabic foot (cf. Gerken, 1996; Demuth & Tremblay, 2008). However, preliminary studies of Spanish suggest that children’s first articles appear in larger prosodic structures, possibly due to the higher frequency of longer words. To assess this issue, this study examined longitudinal data from two Spanish 1- to 2-year-olds. As expected, both produced their early articles with monosyllabic and disyllabic nouns, rapidly expanding article use to trisyllabic nouns as well. The results suggest that the prosodic complexity of the lexicon plays an important role in the development of prosodic structure, providing the context for early prosodic licensing of grammatical morphemes.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
2.
BrownR. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BloomL.LifterK.HafitzJ. (1980). The semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.
4.
ConnellyM. (1984). Basotho children’s acquisition of noun morphology. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
5.
DavisL.MacNeilageP. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1199–1211.
6.
DemuthK. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In BeckmanJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 25 (pp. 13–25). Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
7.
DemuthK. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In MorganJ.DemuthK. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 171–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
DemuthK. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In WeissenbornJ.HöhleB. (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Language acquisition and language disorders series, 24 (pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9.
DemuthK.EllisD. (2009). Revisiting the acquisition of Sesotho noun class prefixes. In GuoJ.LievenE.BudwigN.Ervin-TrippS.NakamuraK.OzçalikanS. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Festschrift for Dan Slobin (pp. 93–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
DemuthK.JohnsonM. (2003). Truncation to submiminal words in early French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 211–241.
11.
DemuthK.McCulloughE. (2009). The prosodic (re)organization of children’s early English articles. Journal of Child Language, 36, 173–200.
12.
DemuthK.TremblayA. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127.
13.
EddingtonD. (2004). Spanish phonology and morphology: Experimental and quantitative perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
FikkertP. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. PhD dissertation, HIL dissertations 6, Leiden University. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
15.
GerkenL. A. (1991). The metrical basis of children’s subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431–451.
16.
GerkenL. A. (1994a). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–584.
17.
GerkenL. A. (1994b). Young children’s representations of prosodic structure: Evidence from English-speakers’ weak syllable productions. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 19–38.
18.
GerkenL. A. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 72, 683–712.
19.
GerkenL. A.McIntoshB. (1993). The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448–457.
20.
GleitmanL.GleitmanH.LandauB.WannerE. (1988). Where learning begins: Initial representations for language learning. In NewmeyerF. J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 3. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 150–193). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GoadH.BuckleyM. (2006). Prosodic structure in child French: Evidence for the foot. In GavarróA.LleóC. (Eds.), Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5, Acquisition of romance languages (pp. 109–142). Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
22.
HarrisJ. (1983) Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HyamsN. (2007). Aspectual effects on interpretation in early grammar. Language Acquisition, 14, 231–268.
24.
KingL. D. (1992). The semantic structure of Spanish: Meaning and grammatical form. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
25.
LeveltC.SchillerN.LeveltW. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition, 8, 237–264.
26.
LleóC. (1996). To spread or not to spread: Different styles in the acquisition of Spanish phonology. In BernhardtB.GilbertJ.IngramD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition (pp. 215–228). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
27.
LleóC. (1998). Proto-articles in the acquisition of Spanish: Interface between phonology and morphology. In FabriR.OrtmannA.ParodiT. (Eds.), Modelle der Flexion: 18. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (pp. 175–195). Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.
28.
LleóC. (2002). The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures by German–Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 291–313.
29.
LleóC. (2003). Child prosody and filler syllables: Looking into Spanish through the optimal window of acquisition. In MontrulS.OrdóñezF. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages: Papers from the 5th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 4th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 229–253). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
30.
LleóC. (2006). The acquisition of prosodic word structures in Spanish by monolingual and Spanish–German bilingual children. Language and Speech, 49, 205–229.
31.
MacNeilageP. (1998). Nasalization of vowels in nasal environments in babbling: Evidence for frame dominance. Phonetica, 55, 1–17.
32.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
MaratsosM. P. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MarshallC. R.van der LelyH. K. J. (2007). The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with grammatical-SLI. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 191–203.
RadfordA. (1990). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
RoarkB.DemuthK. (2000). Prosodic constraints and the learner’s environment: A corpus study. In HowellS. C.FishS. A.Keith-LucasT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 597–608). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
42.
SelkirkE. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
SelkirkE. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In MorganJ.DemuthK. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
SongJ. Y.SundaraM.DemuthK. (2009). Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 623–642.
45.
VenezianoE.SinclairH. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500.
46.
VihmanM. M.McCuneL. (1994). When is a word a word?Journal of Child Language, 21, 517–542.
47.
WexlerK. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations in child grammar. In LightfoodD.HornsteinN. (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–350). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
