Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2010-08
Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function,thematic scope,and contribution to the development of discursive skills
This study examines explanations in children’s natural peer talk, as they emerge in collaborative interaction among children, in two cohorts: preschoolers (aged 4—5) and preadolescents (aged 9—10). The study examined 322 explanations for the diversity of their content-components, their modes of emergence, and social functions. Quantitative analysis revealed a wide range of explanation topics in both cohorts, with a shift with age from the immediate to the more distant. Discourse analysis of explanatory sequences demonstrated a high sensitivity to conversational notions of expectedness and an effective use of explanations for a rich array of pragmatic and social functions, as well as the affordances of peer talk explanations as a potential site for learning and developing the discursive skills of decontextualized discourse.
Antaki, C. ( 1994). Explaining and arguing. London: Sage.
2.
Antaki, C., & Fielding, G. ( 1981). Research on ordinary explanations. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behaviour (pp. 27-55). London: Academic Press.
3.
Aukrust, V.G. ( 2004). Explanatory discourse in young second language learners’ peer play. Discourse Studies, 6, 393-412.
4.
Aukrust, V.G., & Snow, C.E. ( 1998). Narratives and explanations during mealtime in Norway and US. Language in Society, 27, 221-246.
5.
Barbieri, M.S., Colavita, F., & Scheuer, N. ( 1990). The beginning of the explaining capacity. Children’s Language, 7, 245-271.
Beals, D.E., & Snow, C.E. ( 1994). ‘Thunder is when the angels are upstairs bowling’: Narratives and explanations at the dinner table. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4, 331-352.
8.
Blum-Kulka, S. ( 2002). ‘Do you believe Lot’s wife is blocking the way to Jericho?’: Co-constructing theories about the world with adults . In S. Blum-Kulka & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Talking to adults (pp. 85-117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Blum-Kulka, S. ( 2004). The role of peer interaction in later pragmatic development: The case of speech representation. In R. Berman (Ed.), Later language development: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 191-211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.
Blum-Kulka, S. ( 2005). ‘I will tell you the whole true story now’: Sequencing the past, present and future in children’s conversational narratives. In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 275-289). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11.
Blum-Kulka, S., Huck-Taglicht, D., & Avni, H. ( 2004). The social and discursive spectrum of peer talk. Discourse Studies, 6, 307-328.
12.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. ( 2004). The potential of peer talk. Discourse Studies, 6, 291-307.
13.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use (2nd ed.). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Bruner, J. ( 1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Corsaro, W.A. ( 1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gelman, S.A., & Gottfried, G.M. (1996). Children’s causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion. Child Development , 5, 1970-1987.
18.
Goetz, P.J., & Shatz, M. ( 1999). When and how peers give reasons: Justifications in the talk of middle school children. Journal of Child Language , 26, 721-748.
19.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis. London: Penguin Books.
20.
Grice, H.P. ( 1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Habib, T. ( 1996). Family discourse, literacy and parents’ education . MA dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. [In Hebrew.]
22.
Hamo, M., & Blum-Kulka, S. (2007). Apprenticeship in conversation and culture: Emerging sociability in preschool peer talk. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 423-443). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hamo, M., Blum-Kulka, S., & Hacohen, G. ( 2004). From observation to transcription and back: Theory, practice and interpretation in the analysis of children’s naturally occurring discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 71-92.
24.
Harris, P.L. ( 2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford : Blackwell.
25.
Hasan, R. ( 1992). Meaning in sociolinguistic theory. In K. Bolton & H. Kwok (Eds.), Sociolinguistics today (pp. 81-119). London : Routledge.
26.
Heritage, J. ( 1988). Explanations and accounts: A conversation analytic approach . In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday conversation (pp. 127-144). London: Sage.
27.
Hood, L., & Bloom, L. ( 1979). What, when and how about why: A longitudinal study of early expressions of causality. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44(6, Serial No. 181).
28.
Keppler, A., & Luckman, T. ( 1991). ‘Teaching’: Conversational transmission of knowledge. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 143-166). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
29.
McCabbe, A., & Peterson, C. ( 1985). A naturalistic study of the production of causal connectives by children. Journal of Child Language, 12, 145-159.
30.
McTear, M. ( 1985). Children’s conversation. Oxford : Blackwell.
31.
Nelson, K. ( 1989). Narratives from the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Ninio, A., & Snow, C. ( 1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder, CO : Westview.
33.
Orsolini, M. ( 1993). Dwarfs do not shoot - an analysis of children’s justifications. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 281-297.
34.
Peterson, C., & McCabbe, A. ( 1991). Linking children’s connective use and narrative macro-structure. In C. Peterson & A. McCabbe (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 29-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Piaget, J. ( 1972). The child’s conception of physical causality. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. (Original work published 1929.)
36.
Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. ( 1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics . Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365-95.
37.
Rogoff, B. ( 1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Saarni, C., Mumme, D.L., & Campos, J.J. ( 1998). Emotional development: Action, communication, and understanding . In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 237-309). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. ( 1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 697-735.
40.
Schult, C.A., & Wellman, H.M. ( 1997). Explaining human movements and actions: Children’s understanding of the limits of psychological explanation. Cognition, 62, 291-324.
41.
Tannen, D. ( 1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Veneziano, E. ( 2001). Interactional processes in the origins of the explaining capacity. In K. Nelson, A. Aksu-Koc, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Children’s language, Vol. 10: Developing narrative and discourse competence (pp. 113-114). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H. ( 1995). Functional changes in early child language: The appearance of reference to the past and of explanations. Journal of Child Language, 22, 557-581.
44.
Weizman, E., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). Ordinary misunderstanding . In M. Stamenoff (Ed.), Current advances in semantic theory (pp. 419-434). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45.
Wells, G. ( 1981). Learning through interaction. London : Cambridge University Press.
