The current study sought to assess development differences in children's learning of irregular nouns and verbs under conditions of negative and positive evidence. Fifty-five 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children learned nonsense nouns and verbs and were later asked to produce plural forms for the nouns and past tense forms for the verbs. Forms were constructed to be irregular, and half were provided through negative evidence and half through positive evidence. Age, form (noun vs. verb) and evidence type (negative vs. positive) interacted: 3-year-olds learned more nouns through negative evidence t(15) = 2.76, p = 0.014, r2 = 0.34, while 5-year-olds learned more verbs through negative evidence t(16) = 2.281, p = 0.04, r2 = 0.25. Four-year-olds showed equal learning across the two conditions. These results suggest developmental differences in the efficacy of negative evidence.
Akhtar, A. & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 952—965.
2.
Baker, N.D. & Nelson, K.E. (1984). Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances in young children. First Language, 5(1), 3—21.
3.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's acquisition of English morphology . Word, 14, 150—177.
4.
Bohannon, J.N. & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 684—689.
5.
Bohannon, J.N. & Stanowicz, L. (1989). Bi-directional effects of repetition in conversation: A synthesis within a cognitive model. In K. E. Nelson & G. Speidel (Eds), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 122—150). New York: Springer Verlag.
6.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. London: George Allen.
7.
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11—53). New York: Wiley.
8.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(3), 425—455.
9.
Bybee, J.L. & Slobin, D.I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58(2), 265—289.
10.
Chouinard, M.M. & Clark, E.V. (2003). Adult reformation of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 637—669.
11.
Clark, E.V. & Grossman, J.B. (1998). Pragmatic directions and children's word learning. Journal of Child Language, 25(1), 1—18.
12.
Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Demetras, M.J., Post, K.N. & Snow, C.E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13(2), 275—292.
14.
Farrar, M.J. (1990). Discourse and acquisition of grammatical morphemes . Journal of Child Language, 17(3), 607—624.
Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, S., Thal, D., Bates, E., et al. (1996). MacArthur communicative development inventory user's guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
17.
Fraysse, J.C. & Deprels-Fraysse, A. (1990). The influence of experimenter attitude on the performance of children of different cognitive ability levels . Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151(2), 169—179.
18.
Fritzley, V.H. & Lee, K. (2003). Do children always say yes to yes-no questions? A meta-developmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74(5), 1297—1313.
19.
Gold, E. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 6, 432—442.
20.
Hampson, J. & Nelson, K. (1993). The relation of maternal language to variation in rate and style of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 20(2), 313—342.
21.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: Mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language, 11(1), 81—89.
22.
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some contributions of mothers' speech to their children's syntactic growth. Journal of Child Language, 12(2), 367—385.
23.
Hyams, N. (1992). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language . In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (Eds). Theoretical issues in language acquisition: Continuity and change in development (pp. 249—267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Jackendoff, R. (1993). Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature . New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
25.
Kuczaj, S.A. (1977). The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 16(2), 589—600.
26.
Kuczaj, S.A. (1978). Children's judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical irregular past tense verbs. Child Development, 49(2), 319—326.
27.
MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883—914.
28.
Maratsos, M. (2000). More overregularizations after all: New data and discussions on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 183—212.
29.
Marchman, V. (1988). Rules and regularities in the acquisition of the English past tense. Center for Research in Language Newsletter (University of California, San Diego), 2, 4.
30.
Marchman, V., Plunkett, K. & Goodman, J. (1997). Overregularization of English plural and past tense morphology: A response to Marcus. Journal of Child Language , 24(3), 767—779.
31.
Marcus, G.F. (1995). Children's overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 447—459.
32.
Marcus, G.F. (1996). Why do children say “breaked”?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(3), 81—85.
33.
Marcus, G.F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T.J. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (4, Serial No. 228).
34.
Maslen, R.J.C., Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V.M. & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1319—1333.
Nelson, K.E. (1980). Theories of the child's acquisition of syntax: A look at rare events and at necessary, catalytic, and irrelevant components of mother-child conversation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 345, 45—67.
37.
Nelson, K.E. (1991). On differentiated language learning models and differentiated interventions. In N. Krasnegor , D. Rumbaugh & R. Schiefelbusch (Eds), Language acquisition: Biological and behavioral determinants (pp. 399—428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Penner, S.G. (1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58(2), 376—384.
39.
Pine, J.M. (1994). The language of primary caregivers. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 15—37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Science Masters.
42.
Plunkett, K. & Juola, P. (1999). A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 463—490.
43.
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38(1), 43—102.
44.
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition , 48(1), 21—69.
45.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
46.
Rohde, D.L.T. & Plaut, D.C. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition , 72(1), 67—109.
47.
Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 216—271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Sander, E.K. (1972). When are speech sounds learned?Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37(2), 55—63.
49.
Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24(1), 139—161.
50.
Saxton, M. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language , 20(3), 221—252.
51.
Saxton, M., Kulcsar, B., Marshall, G. & Rupra, M. (1998). Longer-term effects of corrective input: An experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 701—721.
52.
Selby, S. (1972). The development of morphological rules in children . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 42(3), 293—299.
53.
Snow, C.E. (1989). Understanding social interaction and language acquisition: Sentences are not enough. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds), Interaction in human development (pp. 83—103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
Sokolov, J.L. (1993). A local contingency analysis of the fine-tuning hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 1008—1023.
55.
Strapp C. M. (1999). Mothers', fathers', and siblings' responses to children's language errors: Comparing sources of negative evidence. Journal of Child Language , 26(2), 373—391.
56.
Strapp C.M. & Federico, A. (2000). Imitations and repetitions: What do children say following recasts?First Language, 20(3), 273—290.
57.
Tomasello, M., Akhtar, N., Dodson, K. & Rekau, L. (1997). Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs. Journal of Child Language, 24(2), 373—387.
58.
Valian, V. (1999). Input and language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 497—530). San Diego: Academic Press.
59.
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P.K. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
