This paper takes a functionalist approach to the acquisition of verb morphology in French and Austrian German. The development of periphrastic constructions using auxiliaries and modal verbs (compound past, modal constructions and analytic future) was examined in two French and two Austrian children’s spontaneous speech samples from the onset of production until 3;0. Crosslinguistic comparisons showed both similarities and differences in the development of periphrastic constructions (e.g., compound past was the first structure to emerge in French but not in Austrian German, analytic future was the last in both languages), suggesting an interplay between general cognitive and language-specific factors. In the four children, developmental analyses showed precursors, such as bare infinitives and past participles and preverbal fillers, which denote a gradual and continuous acquisition process. They also showed temporal relations between grammaticization and lexical production of verbs, which is an argument for the ‘critical lexical mass’ hypothesis and for interdependencies between lexical and grammatical developments. These analyses support a constructivist and interactive view of language acquisition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aksu-KoÁ, A. (1998). The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish . First Language, 18, 255–280 .
2.
Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between the lexicon and grammar . Journal of Child Language, 27, 521–559 .
3.
Bassano, D. & Eme, P. E. (2001). Development of noun determiner use in French children: Lexical and grammatical bases. In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M. J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal & B. MacWhinney (Eds), Research on child language acquisition (pp. 1207–1220). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press .
4.
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I. & Eme, E. (1998). Developmental changes and variability in early lexicon: A study of French children’s naturalistic productions . Journal of Child Language, 25, 493–531 .
5.
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I., Klampfer, S. & Dressler, W. U. (2001a). L’acquisition de la morphologie verbale ‡ travers les langues (I): Les fondements théoriques . Enfance, 1/2001, 81–99 .
6.
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I., Klampfer, S. & Dressler, W. U. (2001b). L’acquisition de la morphologie verbale en franÁais et en allemand autrichien (II): L’épreuve des faits . Enfance 2/2001, 117–148 .
7.
Bates, E., Dale, P. & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds), The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell .
8.
Bates, E. & Goodman, J. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 29–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
9.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987) Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
10.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds), The crosslinguistic study of language processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Behrens, H. (1993). Temporal reference in German child language: Form and function of early verb use. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
12.
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (Eds) (2000). First verbs: On the way to miniparadigms. ZAS Papers in Linguistics , 18.
13.
Caselli, M. C., Casadio, P. & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian . Journal of Child Language, 26, 69–111 .
14.
Choi, S. (1998). Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean . Linguistics, 36, 755–780 .
15.
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
16.
Dressler, W. U. (1997). Universals, typology, and modularity in Natural Morphology. In R. Hickey & S. Puppel (Eds), Language history and language modellings (pp. 1399–1421). Berlin: de Gruyter .
17.
Dressler, W. U. (2000). Naturalness. In Booij et al. (Eds), Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, I (pp. 288–296). Berlin: de Gruyter .
18.
Dressler, W. U., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O. & Wurzel, W. U. (1987). Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
19.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Karmiloff-Smith A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
21.
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. U. (2001). Filler + infinitive and pre- and protomorphology demarcation in a French acquisition corpus . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 653–685 .
22.
Kilani-Schoch, M., De Marco, A., Christofidou, A., Vassilakou, M., Vollmann, R. & Dressler, W. U. (1997). On the demarcation of phases in early morphology acquisition in four languages. In K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (Ed.), Pre- and protomorphology in language acquisition. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 33, 15–32 .
23.
Klampfer, S., Maillochon, I., Bassano, D. & Dressler, W. U. (1999). On early acquisition of verb inflection in Austrian German and French: The case of person and number marking . Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 64ñ65, 1–29 .
24.
MacWhinney, B. (1999a). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
25.
MacWhinney B. (1999b). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney, The emergence of language (pp. 213–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
26.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
27.
Marchman, V. & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis . Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366 .
28.
Peters, A. (1997). Language typology, individual differences and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 5 (pp. 135–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
29.
Peters, A. (2001). Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar? Journal of Child Language, 28, 229–242 .
30.
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L. (1993). False starts and filler-syllables: ways to learn grammatical morphemes . Language, 69, 742–777 .
31.
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1994). The acquisition of Italian verb morphology in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages (pp. 137–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
32.
Plunkett, K. & Juola, P. (1999). A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology . Cognitive Science, 23, 463–490 .
33.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Why study acquisition crosslinguistically? In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1 (pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
34.
Slobin, D. I. (1997a). The Universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 5 (pp. 1–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
35.
Slobin, D. I. (1997b). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 5 (pp. 265–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
36.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .
37.
Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct . Cognitive Development, 10, 131–156 .
38.
Tomasello, M. (Ed.) (1998). The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
39.
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes . Journal of Child Language, 27, 461–500 .
40.
Vollmann, R. (1997). ‘ber die Kategorie ‘fillers’ im Erstspracherwerb . Grazer Linguistische Studien, 48, 103–132 .
41.
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement, and economy of derivation. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds), Verb movement (pp. 305–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
42.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage . Lingua, 106, 23–79 .
43.
Wittek, A. & Tomasello, M. (2002). German children’s productivity with tense morphology: The Perfekt (present perfect) . Journal of Child Language, 29 (3), 567–589 .
