Research has focused on the acquisition of register knowledge, the process by which children choose the appropriate speech (e.g., request forms) for the circumstance. This study examines preschoolers' control act language as a device to index ranking in the friendship group. Are certain children consistently indexed as high ranking and does ranking fluctuate by context? A longitudinal ethnographic study of a preschool classroom was conducted. Children were videotaped on different occasions in friendship groups. Transcripts of play within a girls' and a boys' friendship group were analysed. Control acts were identified and coded for assertiveness/deference and mitigation. Through assertive and deferent control acts, certain children were consistently indexed as high- and low-ranking members of each group. Preschoolers were sensitive to factors like expertise and competence that altered the ranking of group members in specific contexts. Girls used mitigation in some contexts, possibly to index solidarity associated with specific female roles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, E.S. (1990). Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children (London: Routledge).
2.
— (1996). A cross-cultural study of children's register knowledge. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 125-42.
3.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
4.
Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 253-76.
5.
Cook-Gumperz, J. & Szymanski, M. (2001). Classroom 'families': cooperating or competing - girls' and boys' interactional styles in a bilingual classroom. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 107-29 (Special Issue, 'Gender construction in children's interactions: a cultural perspective', ed. A. Kyratzis).
6.
Ervin-Tripp, S.M. (1973). Children's sociolinguistic competence and dialect diversity. In S. Ervin-Tripp, Language Acquisition and Communicative Choice: Essays by Susan-Ervin-Tripp (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 262-301.
7.
— (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25-66.
8.
— (1996). Context in language. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 21-36.
9.
Ervin-Tripp, S.M., Guo, J. & Lampert, M. (1990). Politeness and persuasion in children's control acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 195-219.
10.
Ervin-Tripp, S.M., O'Connor, M.C. & Rosenberg, J. (1984). Language and power in the family. In M. Shultz & C. Kramarae (eds), Language and Power (Belmont, CA: Sage), 116-35.
11.
Goodwin, M.H. (1980). Directive/response speech sequences in girls' and boys' talk activities. In S. McConnell-Ginet , R. Borker & N. Furman (eds), Women and Language in Literature and Society (New York: Praeger).
12.
— (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
13.
— (1993). Accomplishing social organization in girls' play: patterns of competition and cooperation in an African American Working-Class Girls' Group. In S. T. Hollis, L. Pershing & M. J. Young , Feminist Theory and the Study of Folklore ( Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press), 149-63.
14.
— (1999). Constructing opposition within girls' games. In M. Bucholz, A. C. Liang & L. A. Sutton (eds), Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 388-409.
15.
Goodwin, M.H. (2001). Organizing participation in cross-sex jump-rope: situating gender differences within longitudinal studies of activities. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 75-105 (Special Issue, 'Gender construction in children's interactions: a cultural perspective', ed. A. Kyratzis).
16.
Gumperz, J.J. (1982). Discourse Strategies (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
17.
Gumperz, J.J. & Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (eds), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 91-121.
18.
Kyratzis, A. (2000). Tactical uses of narratives in nursery school same-sex friendship groups. Discourse Processes, 29, 269-99.
19.
Kyratzis, A. & Guo, J. (2001). Preschool girls' and boys' verbal conflict strategies in the US and China: cross-cultural and contextual considerations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 45-75 (Special Issue, 'Gender construction in children's interactions: a cultural perspective', ed. A. Kyratzis).
20.
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. ( 1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation (New York: Academic Press).
21.
McElhinny, B.S. (1998). Strategic essentialism in sociolinguistic studies of gender. In N. Waarner, J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, M. Oliver, S. Wertheim & M. Chen (eds), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference (Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group), 469-80.
22.
Nakamura, K. (2001). Gender and language use: same-sex peer interactions among Japanese preschool children. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 15-43 (Special Issue, 'Gender construction in children's interactions: a cultural perspective', ed. A. Kyratzis).
23.
O'Barr, W.M. & Atkins, B.K. (1980). 'Women's language' or 'powerless language'? In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & N. Furman, Women and Language in Literature and Society (New York: Prager), 93-110.
24.
Ochs, E. & Taylor, C. (1995). The 'father knows best' dynamic in dinnertime narratives. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (eds), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (New York & London: Routledge), 97-119.
25.
Sachs, J. ( 19871995). Preschool girls' and boys' language use in pretend play. In S. U. Phillips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (eds), Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 178-88.
26.
Sheldon, A. (1992). Conflict talk: sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 95-117 (Invitational Issue on 'Talk in the study of socialization and development').
27.
— (1996). You can be the baby brother but you aren't born yet: preschool girls' negotiation for power and access in pretend play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29 (1), 57-80 (Special Issue, 'Constituting gender through talk in early childhood: conversations in parent-child, peer, and sibling relationships', ed. A. Sheldon).
28.
Tannen, D. ( 1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 165-87.
29.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School (Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
