Until recently, a long-standing assumption in the field of child language acquisition research was that parents do not correct the grammatical errors of their children. While consensus now exists that potentially corrective responses are often supplied, controversy persists as to whether the child can identify and exploit such information in practice. To address these issues, this study adopts the contrast theory of negative input as a framework for analysis (Saxton 1995). In this theory, two distinct kinds of corrective input are identified, termed negative evidence and negative feedback, respectively. The corrective potential of each category was investigated by examining the immediate effects of each on the grammaticality of child speech. A longitudinal corpus of naturalistic data (49 hours) from a single child was analysed with respect to 11 grammatical categories. The effects of negative input were compared with two non-corrective sources of input, namely positive input and adult move-ons. It was found that grammatical forms were more frequent in child speech following negative evidence and negative feedback than either of the two non corrective sources of input. In light of these and related findings, it is argued that corrective input may well prove important in explanations for how the child eventually retreats from error to attain a mature system of grammar.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anselmi, D., Tomasello, M. & Acunzo, M. (1986). Young children's responses to neutral and specific contingent queries. Journal of Child Language, 13, 135-44.
2.
Berwick, R. & Weinberg, A. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
3.
Bock, K.J. ( 1986). Syntactic persistence in language production . Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-87.
4.
— (1989). Closed-class imminence in sentence production . Cognition, 31, 163-86.
5.
Bohannon, J.N. & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684-9.
6.
Bohannon, J.N., Padgett, R.J., Nelson, K.E. & Mark, M. (1996). Useful evidence on negative evidence. Developmental Psychology, 32 (3), 551-5.
7.
Bowerman, M. (1988). The 'no negative evidence' problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
8.
Brinton, B., Fujiki, F., Loeb, D.F. & Winkler, E. ( 1986). Development of conversational repair strategies in response to requests for clarification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 75-81.
9.
Brooks, P.J. & Braine, M.D.S. (1996). What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235-68.
10.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language (London: George Allen & Unwin).
11.
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In R. Brown (ed.), Psycholinguistics (New York: Free Press).
12.
Camarata, S.M., Nelson, K.E. & Camarata, M. ( 1994). Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1414-23.
13.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding (Dordrecht: Foris).
14.
Demetras, M.J., Post, K.N. & Snow, C.E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275-92.
Fey, M.E., Cleave, P.L., Long, S.H. & Hughes, D.L. (1993). Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairment: an experimental evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36 (1), 141-57.
17.
Fey, M.E., Krulik, T.E., Loeb, D.F. & Proctor-Williams, K. (1999). Sentence recast use by parents of children with typical language and children with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-LanguagePathology , 8 (3), 273-86.
18.
Furrow, D., Baillie, C., McLaren, J. & Moore, C. (1993). Differential responding to two- and three-year-olds' utterances: the role of grammaticality and ambiguity. Journal of Child Language, 20, 363-75.
19.
Gallagher, T.M. ( 1977). Revision behaviors in the speech of normal children developing language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 20, 303-18.
20.
Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. (1996). The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
21.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown & Hanlon revisited: mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language, 11, 81-8.
22.
Hyams, N. & Wexler, K. (1993). On the grammatical basis of null subjects. Linguistic Inquiry, 24 (3), 421-59.
23.
Jackendoff, R. (1993). Patterns in the Mind Language and Human Nature (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf ).
24.
Levelt, W.J.M. & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering . Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78-106.
25.
MacWhinney, B. ( 1995). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk , 2nd edn (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
26.
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1990). The Child Language Data Exchange System: an update . Journal of Child Language, 17, 457-72.
27.
Marcus, G.F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46, 53-85.
28.
— (1995). Children's overregularization of English plurals - a quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22 (2), 447-59.
29.
— (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: can simple recurrent networks obviate the need for domain-specific learning devices? Cognition, 73 (3), 293-6.
30.
Marcus, G.F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T.J. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial no. 228.
31.
Moerk, E.L. (1991). Positive evidence for negative evidence. First Language, 11, 219-51.
32.
Morgan, J.L. (1996). Finding relations between input and outcome in language acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 32 (3), 556-9.
Morgan, J.L. & Travis, L.L. (1989). Limits on negative information in language input . Journal of Child Language, 16, 531-52.
35.
Nelson, K.E. (1987). Some observations from the perspective of the rare event cognitive comparison theory of language acquisition. In K. E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (eds), Children's Language, Vol. 6 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).
36.
Nelson, K.E., Camarata, S.M., Welsh, J., Butkovsky, L. & Camarata, M. (1996). Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language-normal children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 850-9.
37.
Penner, S.G. ( 1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58, 376-84.
38.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
39.
— ( 1994). The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind (London: Penguin).
40.
Post, K. ( 1994). Negative evidence in the language learning environment of laterborns in a rural Florida community. In J. L. Sokolov & C. E. Snow (eds) Handbook of Research in Language Development using CHILDES (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
41.
Randall, J.H. ( 1992). The catapult hypothesis: an approach to unlearning . In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
42.
Rohde, D.L.T. & Plaut, D.C. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small? Cognition , 72 (1), 67-109.
43.
Saxton, M. ( 1995). Negative evidence versus negative feedback: a study of corrective input in child language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
44.
— (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-61.
45.
Saxton, M. & Kulcsar, B. (1995). 'No negative evidence': a premature assumption: a reply to Morgan, Bonamo & Travis. Unpublished manuscript.
46.
Saxton, M., Kulcsar, B., Marshall, G. & Rupra, M. (1998). Longer-term effects of corrective input: an experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25, 701-21.
47.
Smith, P.K., Cowie, H. & Blades, M. (1998). Understanding Children's Development, 3rd edn (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
48.
Strapp, C.M. ( 1999). Mothers', fathers', and siblings' responses to children's language errors: comparing sources of negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 26, 373-91.
49.
Tomasello, M., Conti-Ramsden, G. & Ewert, B. (1990). Young children's conversations with their mothers and fathers: differences in breakdown and repair. Journal of Child Language, 17, 115-30.
50.
Tomasello, M., Farrar, M.J. & Dines, J. (1984). Children's speech revisions for a familiar and an unfamiliar adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 27, 359-63.
51.
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P.W. ( 1980). Formal Principles of Language Acquisition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
52.
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
