This paper investigates the ℋ∞ performance problem of discrete-time Markovian jump cyber-physical systems under deception attacks, utilizing a hybrid-triggered mechanism. First, a hybrid-triggered mechanism is used to reduce the controller update frequency to conserve the limited network bandwidth. Second, a random variable is introduced to describe the deception attack and a new controller model is designed. Third, the stochastic stability of the system is proved through the selection of appropriate segmented Lyapunov functions, which give sufficient conditions for the system to satisfy the ℋ∞ performance index. Finally, we simulate an example to illustrate the efficacy of the approach presented in this paper.
AbdullahiMAlhussianHAzizN, et al. (2024) Comparison and investigation of AI-based approaches for cyberattack detection in cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access12: 31988–32004.
2.
CaoZNiuYSongJ (2019) Finite-time sliding-mode control of Markovian jump cyber-physical systems against randomly occurring injection attacks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control65(3): 1264–1271.
3.
ChenHZongGZhaoX, et al. (2023) Secure filter design of fuzzy switched CPSs with mismatched modes and application: A multidomain event-triggered strategy. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics19(10): 10034–10044.
4.
GaoZZhaoNZhaoX, et al. (2024) Event-triggered prescribed performance adaptive secure control for nonlinear cyber physical systems under denial-of-service attacks. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation131: 107793.
5.
HaoLZhanXWuJ, et al. (2020) Bipartite finite time and fixed time output consensus of heterogeneous multiagent systems under state feedback control. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs68(6): 2067–2071.
6.
HuoJRLiXJ (2023) False data injection attacks on sensors against state estimation in cyber-physical systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute360(9): 6110–6130.
7.
KangWLiuQZhuP, et al. (2024) Coordinated cyber-physical attacks based on different attack strategies for cascading failure analysis in smart grids. Wireless Networks30(5): 3821–3836.
8.
KumarRDeyRGueltonK, et al. (2024) Adaptive control for cyber-physical systems under man-in-the-middle attacks with false data injections. Journal of the Franklin Institute361(4): 106661.
9.
LiHFengQGaoH (2023a) Event-triggered control of Markov jump systems with partially unknown transition rates under time-varying delay and deception attacks. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45(16): 3187–3197.
10.
LiHYangQZhanX, et al. (2023b) Hybrid-triggered ℋ∞ control for networked control systems with deception attacks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs70(9): 3494–3498.
11.
LiHZhanXYangQ, et al. (2024a) Quantized based dynamic-output-feedback guaranteed-cost control of interval-type-2 Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems under DoS attacks. Information Sciences683: 121238.
12.
LiJLiXMChengZ, et al. (2024b) Event-based secure control for cyber-physical systems against false data injection attacks. Information Sciences679: 121093.
13.
LiWShiYLiY (2019) Research on secure control and communication for cyber-physical systems under cyber-attacks. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(12): 3421–3437.
14.
LiXMuX (2024) Dynamic event-triggered fuzzy control for nonlinear singular semi-Markovian jump systems via state decomposition approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation466: 128466.
15.
LinWZhangBYaoD, et al. (2020) Adaptive neural sliding mode control of Markov jump systems subject to malicious attacks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems51(12): 7870–7881.
16.
LiuARenYYaoL, et al. (2023) Secure state estimation for cyber-physical systems by unknown input observer with adaptive switching mechanism. Information Sciences647: 119452.
17.
LiuLJXuNZhaoX (2022) Stability and L1-gain analysis of nonlinear positive Markov jump systems based on a switching transition probability. ISA transactions121: 86–94.
18.
PanKYangFFengZ, et al. (2023) Attack estimation–based resilient control for cyber-physical power systems. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45(5): 886–898.
19.
QinLZhaoYQinJ (2023) Event-based asynchronous resilient control for Markov jump CPSs against cyber-attacks and actuator failures. IEEE Access11: 111068–111078.
20.
SunSSLiYXHouZ (2024) Prescribed performance-based resilient model-free adaptive control for CPSs against aperiodic DoS attacks. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control34(5): 3335–3350.
21.
TanCDiJGuoG, et al. (2024) Exponential mean-square stabilization control for cyber-physical systems under random DoS attacks and transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control70: 190–202.
22.
TaoJXuMChenD, et al. (2022) Event-triggered resilient filtering with the interval type uncertainty for Markov jump systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics53(12): 7834–7843.
23.
WangAFeiMSongY, et al. (2023) Secure adaptive event-triggered control for cyber–physical power systems under denial-of-service attacks. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics54(3): 1722–1733.
24.
WangLLongYLiT, et al. (2024) MPC-based asynchronous attack tolerant control for uncertain Markov jump cyber–physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics54: 7489–7500.
25.
WangYZhuangGChenF (2020) A dynamic event-triggered ℋ∞ control for singular Markov jump systems with redundant channels. International Journal of Systems Science51(1): 158–179.
26.
WangZZhangBXuX, et al. (2022) Research on cyber-physical system control strategy under false data injection attack perception. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. Epub ahead of print 12 January. DOI: 10.1177/01423312211069371.
27.
XuQZhangYZhangB (2018) Network-based event-triggered ℋ∞ filtering for discrete-time singular Markovian jump systems. Signal Processing145: 106–115.
28.
XuXWangZSunHT, et al. (2024) Model-based adaptive security control strategy against false data injection attacks in cyber–physical systems. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control46: 2909–2920.
29.
YangMZhaiJ (2022) Observer-based switching-like event-triggered control of nonlinear networked systems against DoS attacks. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems9(3): 1375–1384.
30.
YangPShenZFengK, et al. (2025) Fault-tolerant control for Markov jump nonlinear systems based on an observer and finite-time fast integral terminal sliding mode control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control47: 419–430.
31.
YeHChengPZhangX, et al. (2023) Event-triggered-based ℋ∞ control for Markov jump cyber-physical systems against denial-of-service attacks. Applied Mathematics and Computation451: 128030.
32.
ZhaLFangJaLiuJ, et al. (2017) Reliable control for hybrid-driven T–S fuzzy systems with actuator faults and probabilistic nonlinear perturbations. Journal of the Franklin Institute354(8): 3267–3288.
33.
ZhanHWuJChengL, et al. (2024) Design of ℋ∞ control strategies with dynamic event-triggered scheme under Markovian deception attacks. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems22(10): 3108–3116.
34.
ZhaoCLamJLinH (2021) State estimation of CPSs with deception attacks: Stability analysis and approximate computation. Neurocomputing423: 318–326.
35.
ZhaoYZhuFZhangW, et al. (2023) Security switching control of cyber-physical system with incremental quadratic constraints under denial-of-service attack. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45(1): 157–167.
