In this paper, a LuGre model–based robust adaptive control (RAC) approach is presented for a pump-controlled hydraulic actuator. We first decompose the LuGre friction model into its steady-state model and a lumped dynamic part applying the mean value theorem, which are compensated by a feedforward term and a robust adaptive term, respectively. The robust adaptive term also plays a part in mismatched disturbance attenuation. In addition, parametric uncertainties and matched disturbances are handled by σ-modified adaptation laws and a robust control law, respectively. The stability of the closed-loop system is proved via the Lyapunov analysis. The efficacy and robustness of the proposed approach are validated by comparative experiments. Compared with common adaptive friction compensation methods, the proposed method has a simpler structure, less computational burden, better control performance, and stronger robustness. Moreover, since the available information is separated from the LuGre model and acts as a model-based compensation term, the design conservativeness of RAC is effectively reduced.
BaDXDinhTQBaeJ, et al. (2020) An effective disturbance-observer-based nonlinear controller for a pump-controlled hydraulic system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics25(1): 32–43.
2.
BarchiDMacchelliABosiG, et al. (2021) Design of a robust adaptive controller for a hydraulic press and experimental validation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology29(5): 2049–2064.
3.
ChenDQianLYinQ, et al. (2023) Extended state observer-based finite time position control of rotational shell magazine via higher order sliding mode technique. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology37(6): 3113–3124.
4.
ChenWHBallanceDJGawthropPJ, et al. (2000) A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics47(4): 932–938.
5.
De WitCCLischinskyP (1997) Adaptive friction compensation with partially known dynamic friction model. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing11(1): 65–80.
6.
De WitCCOlssonHAstromKJ, et al. (1995) A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control40(3): 419–425.
7.
DengWYaoJ (2021) Asymptotic tracking control of mechanical servosystems with mismatched uncertainties. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics26(4): 2204–2214.
8.
DingRDingCXuY, et al. (2021) Neural network-based robust integral error sign control for servo motor systems with enhanced disturbance rejection performance. ISA Transactions129: 580–591.
9.
HanJ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
10.
ImamARafiqMJalayeriE, et al. (2017) Design, implementation and evaluation of a pump-controlled circuit for single rod actuators. Actuators6(1): 10.
11.
IoannouPAKokotovićPV (1985) Adaptive Systems with Reduced Models. 2. Pr. Lecture notes in control and information sciences 47. Berlin: Springer.
12.
IzadbakhshA (2017) FAT-based robust adaptive control of electrically driven robots without velocity measurements. Nonlinear Dynamics89(1): 289–304.
13.
KetelsenSPadovaniDAndersenT, et al. (2019) Classification and review of pump-controlled differential cylinder drives. Energies12(7): 1293.
14.
KhodamipourGKhorashadizadehSFarshadM (2021) Observer-based adaptive control of robot manipulators using reinforcement learning and the Fourier series expansion. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control43(10): 2307–2320.
15.
KoTKaminagaHNakamuraY (2017) Underactuated four-fingered hand with five electro hydrostatic actuators in cluster. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Singapore, May 29–June 3, 2017, pp. 620–625. New York: IEEE.
16.
LiangSWangZ (2021) Integral-type-observer-based control with measurement uncertainty and application to two-wheeled inverted pendulum. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control31(7): 2633–2651.
17.
LischinskyPde WitCCMorelG (1999) Friction compensation for an industrial hydraulic robot. IEEE Control Systems Magazine19(1): 25–32.
18.
LuJYuSZhuG, et al. (2021) Robust adaptive tracking control of UMSVs under input saturation: A single-parameter learning approach. Ocean Engineering234: 108791.
19.
LuoCYaoJGuJ (2019) Extended-state-observer-based output feedback adaptive control of hydraulic system with continuous friction compensation. Journal of the Franklin Institute356(15): 8414–8437.
20.
MerrittHE (1967) Hydraulic Control Systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
NaJLiYHuangY, et al. (2020) Output feedback control of uncertain hydraulic servo systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics67(1): 490–500.
22.
PolycarpouMM (1996) Stable adaptive neural control scheme for nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control41(3): 447–451.
23.
PolycarpouMMIoannouPA (1996) A robust adaptive nonlinear control design. Automatica32(3): 423–427.
24.
ShangYLiXQianH, et al. (2020) A novel electro hydrostatic actuator system with energy recovery module for more electric aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics67(4): 2991–2999.
25.
SwaroopDHedrickJKYipPP, et al. (2000) Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control45(10): 1893–1899.
26.
WangSNaJRenX (2018) RISE-based asymptotic prescribed performance tracking control of nonlinear servo mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems48(12): 2359–2370.
27.
WangWXieBZuoZ, et al. (2019) Adaptive backstepping control of uncertain gear transmission servosystems with asymmetric dead-zone nonlinearity. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics66(5): 3752–3762.
28.
XiaJOuyangHLiS (2023) Fixed-time observer-based back-stepping controller design for tower cranes with mismatched disturbance. Nonlinear Dynamics111(1): 355–367.
29.
XianBDawsonDMde QueirozMS, et al. (2004) A continuous asymptotic tracking control strategy for uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control49(7): 1206–1211.
30.
YangG (2023) Asymptotic tracking with novel integral robust schemes for mismatched uncertain nonlinear systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control33(3): 1988–2002.
31.
YangGYaoJDongZ (2022) Neuroadaptive learning algorithm for constrained nonlinear systems with disturbance rejection. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control32(10): 6127–6147.
32.
YaoBBuFReedyJ, et al. (2000) Adaptive robust motion control of single-rod hydraulic actuators: Theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics5(1): 79–91.
33.
YaoJDengWJiaoZ (2015) Adaptive control of hydraulic actuators with LuGre model-based friction compensation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(10): 6469–6477.
34.
YaoJDengWSunW (2017) Precision motion control for electro-hydraulic servo systems with noise alleviation: A desired compensation adaptive approach. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics22(4): 1859–1868.
35.
YaoJJiaoZMaD (2014) RISE-based precision motion control of DC motors with continuous friction compensation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics61(12): 7067–7075.
36.
YeNSongJRenG (2020) Model-based adaptive command filtering control of an electrohydraulic actuator with input saturation and friction. IEEE Access8: 48252–48263.
37.
YuTPlummerARIravaniP, et al. (2019) The design, control, and testing of an integrated electrohydrostatic powered ankle prosthesis. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics24(3): 1011–1022.
38.
ZhangWLiMGaoY, et al. (2022) Periodic adaptive learning control of PMSM servo system with LuGre model-based friction compensation. Mechanism and Machine Theory167: 104561.
