This paper focuses on network time delay, network congestion, and network security in the networked control system. A secure event-based quantized networked control system (SEQNCS) is proposed to address these problems. The predictive method in the SEQNCS actively compensates time delay both in the forward channel and feedback channel according to the previous states and control inputs. Both the event-driven strategy and quantizer are introduced into the SEQNCS to alleviate network congestion by the event trigger conditions and quantization density. The encrypted encoding quantizer is constructed in the SEQNCS to implement the protection of data security under deception attacks while quantifying the transmitted data. The proposed SEQNCS achieves desired system performance of the networked control system under time delay and deception attacks while alleviating network congestion. The stability of the SEQNCS is proved by the piecewise linear model approach. Practical experiments are implemented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SEQNCS.
BrockettRLiberzonD (2000) Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control45(7): 1279–1289.
2.
DengYRYinXXHuS (2021) Event-triggered predictive control for networked control systems with DoS attacks. Information Sciences542: 71–91.
3.
FuMXieL (2005) The sector bound approach to quantized feedback control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50(11): 1698–1711.
4.
GuptaRChowM (2008) Performance assessment and compensation for secure networked control systems. In: 34th annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics, Orlando, FL, 10–13 November, pp. 2929–2934. New York: IEEE.
5.
HanYCLianJ (2022) Event-triggered control of networked switched systems under network attacks. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control44(6): 1334–1343.
LiuGP (2015) Design and analysis of networked non-linear predictive control systems. IET Control Theory and Applications9(11): 1740–1745.
8.
LiuGPSunJZhaoY-B (2013) Design, analysis and real-time implementation of networked predictive control systems. Acta Automatica Sinica39(11): 1769–1777.
9.
LiuGPXiaYQChenJ, et al. (2007) Networked predictive control of systems with random network delays in both forward and feedback channels. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics54(3): 1282–1297.
10.
MendelFNadTSchläfferM (2011) Finding sha-2 characteristics: Searching through a minefield of contradictions. In: 17th international conference on the theory and application of cryptology and information security, Seoul, South Korea, 4–8 December, pp. 288–307. Berlin: Springer.
11.
PangZHLiuGP (2012) Design and implementation of secure networked predictive control systems under deception attacks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology20(5): 1334–1342.
12.
PangZHLiuGPZhouD, et al. (2017) Data-based predictive control for networked nonlinear systems with packet dropout and measurement noise. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity30(5): 1072–1083.
13.
SandbergHGuptaVJohanssonKH (2022) Secure networked control systems. Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems5: 445–464.
14.
SchneierB (1996) Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C. London: Wiley.
15.
SoeTZanmaTTokunagaA, et al. (2020) Optimisation of dynamic quantisation and control for quantised state feedback control system. Journal of Engineering7: 251–258.
16.
WangJDingBC (2018) Two-step output feedback predictive control for hammerstein systems with networked-induced time delays. International Journal of Systems Science49(13): 2753–2762.
17.
WangYHePLiH, et al. (2020) Stabilization for networked control system with time-delay and packet loss in both S-C side and C-A side. IEEE Access8: 2513–2523.
18.
WangZYLiuGP (2019) Performance improvement of NCSS under complex network via concurrent paths. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity32(2): 453–478.
19.
XueBLiNLiS, et al. (2010) Robust model predictive control for networked control systems with quantisation. IET Control Theory and Applications4(12): 2896–2960.
20.
YangHXuYZhangJ (2016) Event-driven control for networked control systems with quantization and markov packet losses. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics47(8): 2235–2243.
21.
YangRShiPLiuG-P, et al. (2011) Network-based feedback control for systems with mixed delays based on quantization and dropout compensation. Automatica47(12): 2805–2809.
22.
YangRNYuYRSunJ, et al. (2020) Event-based networked predictive control for networked control systems subject to two-channel delays. Information Sciences524: 136–147.
23.
YinXXYueDHuS, et al. (2016) Model-based event-triggered predictive control for networked systems with data dropout. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization54(2): 567–586.
24.
ZanmaTAzegamiMLiuK-Z (2017) Optimal input and quantization interval for quantized feedback system with variable quantizer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(3): 2246–2254.
25.
ZhangXMHanQLGeX, et al. (2020) Networked control systems: A survey of trends and techniques. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica7(1): 1–17.
26.
ZhaoLMaXWangJ (2019) Networked predictive control for linear systems with quantizers by an event-driven strategy. Journal of the Franklin Institute356(6): 3245–3269.
