Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-8
Design of optimized interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller based on the continuity,monotonicity,and smoothness properties for a cart-pole inverted pendulum system
In this study, an interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller design method is proposed and validated on the real-time under-actuated nonlinear inverted pendulum system for swing-up and stabilization control problems. The swing-up algorithm is designed to give a faster response and the stabilization controller is designed based on continuity, monotonicity, and smoothness theorems for worst and best cases using the Mamdani fuzzy inference system in order to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. Outstanding type reduction methods are analyzed for the stabilization controller based on the design approach to determine the best type reduction algorithm for the effective and robust control performance. Real-time experiments are conducted to investigate the capability of the proposed controller in terms of adaptation performance and robustness ability. The controller also is able to handle structured and unstructured uncertainties such as measurement noise, external payload, undesirable internal/external disturbances, and parameter uncertainties. The results show that the proposed method clearly improves the control performance of the system in six experimental tasks conducted.
AbutTSoyguderS (2022) Two-loop controller design and implementations for an inverted pendulum system with optimal self-adaptive fuzzy-proportional–integral–derivative control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control44(2): 468–483.
2.
ChenXYuRHuangK, et al. (2018) Linear motor driven double inverted pendulum: A novel mechanical design as a testbed for control algorithms. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory81: 31–50.
3.
ChenY (2019) Study on centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems based on noniterative algorithms. Complexity2019: 7325053.
4.
ChenY (2020) Design of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang type interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems based on enhanced opposite direction searching algorithms. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control16(6): 2091–2101.
5.
ChenYWangDNingW (2015) Studies on centroid type-reduction algorithms for general type-2 fuzzy logic systems. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control11(6): 1987–2000.
6.
ChiuCHLinCM (2018) Control of an omnidirectional spherical mobile robot using an adaptive Mamdani-type fuzzy control strategy. Neural Computing and Applications30(4): 1303–1315.
7.
ControllersT-FLWuD (2012) On the fundamental differences between interval. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems20(5): 832–848.
8.
El-BardiniMEl-NagarAM (2014) Interval type-2 fuzzy PID controller for uncertain nonlinear inverted pendulum system. ISA Transactions53(3): 732–743.
9.
GraichenKTreuerMZeitzM (2007) Swing-up of the double pendulum on a cart by feedforward and feedback control with experimental validation. Automatica43(1): 63–71.
HasseniS-E-IAbdouL (2020) Robust LFT-LPV H∞ control of an underactuated inverted pendulum on a cart with optimal weighting functions selection by GA and ES. Acta Mechanica et Automatica14(4): 186–197.
12.
HmidiRBen BrahimADhahriS, et al. (2021) Sliding mode fault-tolerant control for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with local nonlinear models: Application to inverted pendulum and cart system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control43(4): 975–990.
13.
HuangJRiMWuD, et al. (2018) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic modeling and control of a mobile two-wheeled inverted pendulum. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(4): 2030–2038.
14.
JmelIDimassiHHadj-SaidS, et al. (2020) An adaptive sliding mode observer for inverted pendulum under mass variation and disturbances with experimental validation. ISA Transactions102: 264–279.
15.
KelekciEKizirS (2019) Trajectory and vibration control of a flexible joint manipulator using interval type-2 fuzzy logic. ISA Transactions94: 218–233.
16.
KizirSBingulZOysuC (2010) Fuzzy control of a real time inverted pendulum system. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems21: 121–133.
17.
KouikoglouVSPhillisYA (2009) On the monotonicity of hierarchical sum—Product fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems160(24): 3530–3538.
18.
MahmoodabadiMJHaghbayanHK (2020) An optimal adaptive hybrid controller for a fourth-order under-actuated nonlinear inverted pendulum system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control42(2): 285–294.
19.
Manrique EscobarCAPappalardoCMGuidaD (2020) A parametric study of a deep reinforcement learning control system applied to the swing-up problem of the Cart-Pole. Applied Sciences10(24): 9013.
20.
MendelJMHagrasHTanW-W, et al. (2014) Introduction to Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Control: Theory and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
MendelJMJohnRILiuF (2006) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems14(6): 808–821.
22.
MishraSKChandraD (2014) Stabilization and tracking control of inverted pendulum using fractional order PID controllers. Journal of Engineering2014: 752918.
23.
MittalKJainASinghK, et al. (2020) Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review on type 2 fuzzy logic applications: Past, present and future. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence95: 103916.
24.
NasirANKRaja IsmailRMTAhmadMA (2010) Performance comparison between sliding mode control (SMC) and PD-PID controllers for a nonlinear inverted pendulum system. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology46(10): 400–405.
25.
PengWLiCZhangG, et al. (2020) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic based transmission power allocation strategy for lifetime maximization of WSNs. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence87: 103269.
26.
PingZLiuCHuangY, et al. (2021a) Experimental output regulation of linear motor driven inverted pendulum with friction compensation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems51(6): 3751–3758.
27.
PingZZhouMLiuC, et al. (2021b) An improved neural network tracking control strategy for linear motor-driven inverted pendulum on a cart and experimental study. Neural Computing and Applications. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-05986-9
28.
RahmaniRMobayenSFekihA, et al. (2021) Robust passivity cascade technique-based control using RBFN approximators for the stabilization of a cart inverted pendulum. Mathematics9(11): 1229.
29.
ReznikL (1997) Fuzzy Controllers Handbook: How to Design Them, How They Work. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30.
SalakenSMKhosraviANahavandiS (2016) Modification on enhanced Karnik–Mendel algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications65: 283–291.
31.
SongZHuangJWuD (2017) Performance comparison of efficient type-reduction approaches for interval type-2 fuzzy logic control. In: 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China, 20–22 October, pp. 1588–1592. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CAC.2017.8243021.
32.
SunZWangNBiY (2015) Type-1/type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimization with RNA genetic algorithm for double inverted pendulum. Applied Mathematical Modelling39(1): 70–85.
33.
TaskinAKumbasarT (2015) An Open Source Matlab/Simulink Toolbox for interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In: 2015 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence, Cape Town, South Africa, 7–10 December, pp. 1561–1568. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SSCI.2015.220.
34.
Van BroekhovenEDe BaetsB (2009) Only smooth rule bases can generate Monotone Mamdani–Assilian models under center-of-gravity defuzzification. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17(5): 1157–1174.
35.
WuDMendelJM (2011) On the continuity of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems19(1): 179–192.
36.
WuDNieM (2011) Comparison and practical implementation of type-reduction algorithms for type-2 fuzzy sets and systems. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011), Taipei, Taiwan, 27–30 June, pp. 2131–2138. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/FUZZY.2011.6007317.
37.
YarenTKizirS (2018) Stabilization control of triple pendulum on a cart. In: 6th international conference on control engineering and information technology, CEIT 2018, Istanbul, 25–27 October, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CEIT. 2018.8751818
38.
YehC-YJengW-HRLeeS-J (2011) An enhanced type-reduction algorithm for type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems19(2): 227–240.
39.
ZhangJZhangW (2012) LQR self-adjusting based control for the planar double inverted pendulum. Physics Procedia24(2012): 1669–1676.
40.
ZhangSAnRShaoS (2011) A new type of adaptive neural network fuzzy controller in the double inverted pendulum system. In: 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence, AICI 2011, Taiyuan, China, 24–25 September, pp. 149–157. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-23887-1_19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
