This paper investigates the security control problem of the cyber-physical system under false data injection attacks. A model predictive switching control strategy based on attack perception is proposed to compensate for the untrusted sequence of data caused by false data injection attacks. First, the binary attack detector is applied whether the system has suffered the attack. If the attack occurs, multistep correction is carried out for the future data according to the previous time data, and the waiting period is set. The input and output sequence of the controller is reconstructed, and the system is modeled as a constant time-delay switched system. Subsequently, the Lyapunov methods and average-dwell time are combined to provide sufficient conditions for the asymptotical stability of closed-loop switched system. Finally, the simulation of the networked first-order inverted pendulum model reveals that the control technique can efficiently suppress the influence of the attacks.
AnLWYangGH (2019) Distributed secure state estimation for cyber-physical systems under sensor attacks. Automatica107: 526–538.
2.
FuRXuYTangY, et al. (2020) Petri net-based voltage control strategy under false data injection attack. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control42(14): 2622–2631.
3.
HeWLGaoXYZhongWM, et al. (2018) Secure impulsive synchronization control of multi-agent systems under deception attacks. Information Sciences459: 354–368.
4.
HumayedALinJQLiFJ, et al. (2017) Cyber-physical systems security: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal4(6): 1802–1831.
5.
KurtMNYilmazYWangXD (2020) Secure distributed dynamic state estimation in wide-area smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security15: 800–815.
6.
LaQQuekTLeeJ, et al. (2016) Deceptive attack and defense game in honeypot-enabled networks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal3(6): 1025–1035.
7.
LiWShiYLiY (2019a) Research on secure control and communication for cyber-physical systems under cyber-attacks. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(12): 3421–3437.
8.
LiYGYangGH (2019) Optimal stealthy false data injection attacks in cyber-physical systems. Information Sciences481: 474–490.
9.
LiYPDengYXiaoY, et al. (2019b) Attack and defense strategies in complex networks based on game theory. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity32(6): 1630–1640.
10.
LiYZShiDWChenTW (2018) False data injection attacks on networked control systems: A Stackelberg game analysis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control63(10): C3503–C3509.
11.
LiZJZhaoJ (2021) Resilient adaptive control of switched nonlinear cyber-physical systems under uncertain deception attacks. Information Sciences543: 398–409.
12.
LinJXFeiSMGaoZF, et al. (2013) Fault detection for discrete-time switched singular time-delay systems: An average dwell time approach. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing27(7): 582–609.
13.
LiuKMaSHMaAY, et al. (2019) Secure control for cyber-physical systems based on machine learning. Acta Automatica Sinica52: 369–374.
14.
LiuYZChenYLiM, et al. (2020) MPC for the cyber-physical system with deception attacks. In: 2020 Chinese control and decision conference, Hefei, China, 22–24August.
15.
ManshaeiMHZhuQYAlpcanT, et al. (2011) Game theory meets network security and privacy. ACM Computing Surveys45(3): 1–39.
16.
PengCSunHTYangMJ, et al. (2019) A survey on security communication and control for smart grids under malicious cyber attacks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems49(8): 1554–1569.
17.
PengDTDongJMCaiZM, et al. (2018) A study on stability of cyber-physical systems under false data injection attacks. Acta Automatica Sinica45(1): 196–205.
18.
ShiLDaiQNiY (2018) Review of network attacks in power information physical fusion system environment. Electric Power Systems Research163: 396–412.
19.
SunHTPengCWangZW (2019) Event-triggered predictive control of cyber-physical systems under DoS attacks. Journal of Control and Decision34(11): C2303–C2309.
20.
WangQTaiWTangY, et al. (2019a) A two-layer game theoretical attack-defense model for a false data injection attack against power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems104: 169–177.
21.
WangSXLiJYZhangB (2020) Synchronization control of jumping coupled cyber-physical system with actuator failures under deception attacks. Control Theory Applications37(04): 170–177.
22.
WangZWLiLSunHT, et al. (2019b) Dynamic output feedback control of cyber-physical systems under DoS attacks. IEEE Access7: 181032–181040.
23.
ZamaniIShafieeM (2014) On the stability issues of switched singular time-delay systems with slow switching based on average dwell-time. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control24(4): 595–624.
24.
ZhangHPengCSunHT, et al. (2019) Adaptive state estimation for cyber physical systems under sparse attacks. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(6): 1571–1579.
25.
ZhangLXShiP (2009) Stability, -gain and asynchronous control of discrete-time switched systems with average dwell time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control54: 2192–2199.
26.
ZhangTYYeD (2020) False data injection attacks with complete stealthiness in cyber–physical systems: A self-generated approach. Automatica120: 109117.
27.
ZhuangKXSunZW (2020) Establishing a detection model for denial of service attacks in industrial cyber-physical systems. Control Theory Applications37(3): 629–638.
