In this paper, the vibration suppression problem of a flexible satellite system is addressed. The dynamic model of the flexible satellite system is expressed by a set of non-homogeneous partial differential equations (PDEs). By using the theory of systems with uniform ultimate bounded (UUB) solutions and adaptive techniques, adaptive boundary control is presented to suppress the vibration of the flexible satellite with parametric uncertainties. A disturbance adaptive law is constructed to compensate for the effect of the boundary disturbance, and an auxiliary system is considered to mitigate the effect of input saturation. The well-posedness of the closed-loop system is discussed, and UUB stability can be ensured through a rigorous Lyapunov-like analysis. Numerical simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.
AouesSCardoso-RibeiroFLMatignonDet al. (2017) Modeling and control of a rotating flexible spacecraft: A Port–Hamiltonian approach. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology27(1): 355–362.
2.
AzadiMEghtesadMFazelzadehSAet al. (2015) Dynamics and control of a smart flexible satellite moving in an orbit. Multibody System Dynamics35(1): 1–23.
3.
BalasMJ (1978) Active control of flexible systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications25(3): 415–436.
4.
ChenMGeSSRenB (2011) Adaptive tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with input constraints. Automatica47(3): 452–465.
5.
DoKDPanJ (2008) Boundary control of transverse motion of marine risers with actuator dynamics. Journal of Sound and Vibration318(4): 768–791.
6.
DoKDPanJ (2009) Boundary control of three-dimensional inextensible marine risers. Journal of Sound and Vibration327(3): 299–321.
7.
DuHLiS (2014) Attitude synchronization control for a group of flexible spacecraft. Automatica50(2): 646–651.
GrimmGHatfieldJPostlethwaiteIet al. (2003) Antiwindup for stable linear systems with input saturation: An LMI-based synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic control48(9): 1509–1525.
10.
GuoBZGuoW (2007) Adaptive stabilization for a Kirchhoff-type nonlinear beam under boundary output feedback control. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications66(2): 427–441.
11.
GuoBZJinFF (2010) Arbitrary decay rate for two connected strings with joint anti-damping by boundary output feedback. Automatica46(7): 1203–1209.
12.
HeWGeSS (2015) Dynamic modeling and vibration control of a flexible satellite. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems51(2): 1422–1431.
13.
HeWGeSS (2016) Cooperative control of a nonuniform gantry crane with constrained tension. Automatica66(4): 146–154.
14.
HeWHeXYGeSS (2016) Vibration control of flexible marine riser systems with input saturation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics21(1): 254–265.
15.
HeWMengTHuangDet al. (2017) Adaptive boundary iterative learning control for an Euler–Bernoulli beam system with input constraint. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems29(5): 1539–1549.
16.
HeWMengTHeXet al. (2018) Unified iterative learning control for flexible structures with input constraints. Automatica96: 326–336.
17.
HeWSunCGeSS (2015) Top tension control of a flexible marine riser by using integral-barrier Lyapunov function. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics20(2): 497–505.
18.
HeWZhangSGeSS (2014) Adaptive control of a flexible crane system with the boundary output constraint. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics61(8): 4126–4133.
19.
HornRAJohnsonCR (1990) Matrix Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HuQL (2012) Robust adaptive sliding mode attitude control and vibration damping of flexible spacecraft subject to unknown disturbance and uncertainty. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control34(4): 436–447.
21.
HuQLMaGF (2005) Variable structure control and active vibration suppression of flexible spacecraft during attitude maneuver. Aerospace Science and Technology9(4): 307–317.
22.
HuQLMaGFXieLH (2008) Robust and adaptive variable structure output feedback control of uncertain systems with input nonlinearity. Automatica44(2): 552–559.
23.
KangWGuoBZ (2016) Stabilisation of unstable cascaded heat partial differential equation system subject to boundary disturbance. IET Control Theory and Applications10(9): 1027–1039.
24.
KarafyllisIKrsticM (2016) ISS with respect to boundary disturbances for 1-D parabolic PDEs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control61(12): 3712–3724.
25.
LiuCDongCWangQet al. (2018a) Stabilization of a class of switched uncertain systems by active disturbance rejection control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(16): 4421–4431.
26.
LiuJJWangJM (2017) Boundary stabilization of a cascade of ODE-wave systems subject to boundary control matched disturbance. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control27(2): 252–280.
27.
LiuLCaoD (2016) Dynamic modeling for a flexible spacecraft with solar arrays composed of honeycomb panels and its PD control with input shaper. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control138(8): 081008.
28.
LiuRLiuMLiuY (2018b) Nonlinear optimal tracking control of spacecraft formation flying with collision avoidance. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(4): 889–899.
29.
LiuYZhaoZJHeW (2016a) Boundary control of an axially moving accelerated/decelerated belt system. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control26(17): 3849–3866.
30.
LiuYZhaoZHeW (2016b) Stabilization of an axially moving accelerated/decelerated system via an adaptive boundary control. ISA transactions64: 394–404.
31.
LiuYZhaoZHeW (2017) Boundary control of an axially moving system with high acceleration/deceleration and disturbance observer. Journal of the Franklin Institute354(7): 2905–2923.
32.
LiuYGuoFHeXYet al. (2018c) Boundary control for an axially moving system with input restriction based on disturbance observers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems. Epub ahead of print 27 June 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2843523.
33.
MeirovitchLBaruhH (1983) On the problem of observation spillover in self-adjoint distributed-parameter systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications39(2): 269–291.
34.
MéndezCXCSouzaLCG (2004) Using of H-infinity control method in attitude control system of rigid–flexible satellite. Mathematical Problems in Engineering16(4): 266–287.
35.
Moreno-ValenzuelaJCampaR (2009) Two classes of velocity regulators for input-saturated motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(6): 2190–2202.
36.
Moreno-ValenzuelaJGuzman-GuemezJ (2016) Experimental evaluations of voltage regulators for a saturated boost DC-to-DC power converter. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(3): 327–337.
37.
MuCHeH (2018) Dynamic behavior of terminal sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics65(4): 3480–3490.
38.
NguyenQCHongKS (2012) Simultaneous control of longitudinal and transverse vibrations of an axially moving string with velocity tracking. Journal of Sound and Vibration331(13): 3006–3019.
39.
QueirozMSDawsonDMNagarkattiSPet al. (2000) Lyapunov-Based Control of Mechanical Systems. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
40.
SalinasAMoreno-ValenzuelaJKellyR (2016) A family of nonlinear PID-like regulators for a class of torque-driven robot manipulators equipped with torque-constrained actuators. Advances in Mechanical Engineering8(2): 1–14.
41.
SunCYHeWHongJ (2017) Neural network control of a flexible robotic manipulator using the lumped spring-mass model. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems47(8): 1863–1874.
42.
WangJMSuLLLiHX (2015) Stabilization of an unstable reaction-diffusion PDE cascaded with a heat equation. Systems and Control Letters76: 8–18.
43.
YangKJHongKSMatsunoF (2004) Robust adaptive boundary control of an axially moving string under a spatiotemporally varying tension. Journal of Sound and Vibration273(4): 1007–1029.
44.
ZhouJWenC (2008) Adaptive Backstepping Control of Uncertain Systems: Nonsmooth Nonlinearities, Interactions or Time-Variations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
