This article rereads Mk 5.1–20 through Disability Studies and Mad Studies, presenting the Gerasene episode as social critique rather than a simple miracle narrative. ‘Legion’ functions as a marker of Roman domination and communal labelling that produce social disability and social death. Close analysis of δαιμονίζομαι, λεγιών, and σωϕρονέω shows how Mark grammatically preserves the man’s personhood and depicts restored judgment with social implications. The narrative’s irony exposes sanist assumptions and economic interests underlying the townspeople’s fear and their request for Jesus to leave. Jesus redirects the man’s desire ‘to be with’ him into a commission ‘to tell’ in the Decapolis, relocating authorized speech to a restored Gentile witness. Reintegration is reframed as vocation rather than return—(in)complete socially yet realized missionally through testimony that challenges colonial-sanist control and reorders communal value.
AlandBarbaraAlandKurtKaravidopoulosJohannesMartiniCarlo MariaMetzgerBruce M. (eds) 2012Novum Testamentum Graece (28th rev. edn; Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft) (NA28).
AvalosHector1995Illness and Health Care in the Ancient Near East: The Role of the Temple in Greece, Mesopotamia, and Israel (Atlanta: Scholars Press).
4.
AvalosHector1999Health Care and the Rise of Christianity (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
5.
BalzHorstSchneiderGerhard (eds) 1990–1993Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (3 vols; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans) (EDNT).
6.
BazzanaGiovanni B.2020Having the Spirit of Christ: Spirit Possession and Exorcism in the Early Christ Groups (Synkrysis; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
7.
BetzHans Dieter (ed.) 1986The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation, Including the Demotic Spells (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
8.
The Bible and Culture Collective1995The Postmodern Bible (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
9.
BrownPeter1981The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
10.
BurdonChristopher2004 ‘“To the Other Side”: Construction of Evil and Fear of Liberation in Mark 5.1–20’, JSNT27: 149–67.
11.
BurrowAndrew2017 ‘Bargaining with Jesus: Irony in Mark 5,1-20’, BibInt25: 234–51.
12.
Camery-HoggattJerry1992Irony in Mark’s Gospel: Text and Subtext (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
13.
CarterWarren2006The Roman Empire and the New Testament: An Essential Guide (Nashville, TN: Abingdon).
14.
CastroDolores2023 ‘Building Leadership, Forging Cohesion: Bishops and Charity in Late Antiquity’, in CastroDoloresRuchesiFernando (eds), Leadership, Social Cohesion, and Identity in Late Antique Spain and Gaul (500-700) (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press): 29–62.
15.
CookChristopher C. H.HamleyIsabelleSwintonJohn2023Struggling with God: Mental Health and Christian Spirituality (London: SPCK).
16.
DankerFrederick W.BauerWalterArndtWilliam F.GingrichF. Wilbur2000A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (3rd edn; Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press) (BDAG).
17.
deSilvaDavid A.20064 Maccabees: Introduction and Commentary on the Greek Text in Codex Sinaiticus (Septuagint Commentary Series; Leiden: Brill).
18.
ErevellesNirmala2011Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
19.
HogeterpAlbert2020 ‘Trauma and Its Ancient Literary Representation: Mark 5,1–20’, ZNW111: 1–32.
20.
Josephus1930Jewish Antiquities, Books V–VIII (trans. ThackerayH. St. J.MarcusRalph; LCL, 281; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
21.
KlinghardtMatthias2007 ‘Legionsschweine in Gerasa. Lokalkolorit und historischer Hintergrund von Mk 5,1–20’, ZNW98: 28–48.
22.
LawrenceLouise J.2011 ‘Exploring the Sense-scape of the Gospel of Mark’, JSNT33: 387–97.
23.
LawrenceLouise J.2013Sense and Stigma in the Gospels (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
24.
LeFrançoisBrenda A.MenziesRobertReaumeGeoffrey (eds) 2013Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies (Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press).
LightstoneJack N.2006The Commerce of the Sacred: Mediation of the Divine Among Jews in the Greco-Roman Diaspora (2nd edn; Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
27.
MacMullenRamsay1974Roman Social Relations, 50 B.C. to A.D. 284 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
28.
MacMullenRamsay2009The Second Church: Popular Christianity A.D. 200–400 (Writings from the Greco-Roman World Supplement Series, 1; Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature).
29.
MainwaringSimon2014Mark, Mutuality, and Mental Health: Encounters with Jesus (Semeia Studies, 79; Atlanta, GA: SBL Press).
30.
MalbonElizabeth Struthers2009Mark’s Jesus: Characterization as Narrative Christology (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
31.
MalinaBruce J.RohrbaughRichard L.2003Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels (2nd edn; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
32.
MarcusJoel2000Mark 1–8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AYB, 27; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
33.
MartindaleCharles1993Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
34.
MitchellDavid T.SnyderSharon L.2000Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
35.
MossCandida R.SchipperJeremy (eds) 2011Disability Studies and Biblical Literature (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
36.
MyersChed1988Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis).
37.
NewheartMichael Willett2004“My Name is Legion”: The Story and Soul of the Gerasene Demoniac (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
38.
O’HaraAlexander2023 ‘Ritual Communities and Social Cohesion in Merovingian Gaul’, in CastroDoloresRuchesiFernando (eds), Leadership, Social Cohesion, and Identity in Late Antique Spain and Gaul (500-700) (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press): 103–30.
39.
OlyanSaul M.2008Disability in the Hebrew Bible: Interpreting Mental and Physical Differences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
40.
PerlinMichael L.2000The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).
RhoadsDavid M.DeweyJoannaMichieDonald1999Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel (2nd edn; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
44.
SiebersTobin2008Disability Theory (4th edn; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
45.
SnyderSharon L.MitchellDavid T.2006Cultural Locations of Disability (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
46.
StuckenbruckLoren T.2013 ‘The Human Being and Demonic Invasion: Therapeutic Models in Ancient Jewish and Christian Texts,’ in CookChristopher C. H. (ed.), Spirituality, Theology and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (London: SCM): 94–123.
47.
StuckenbruckLoren T.2014The Myth of Rebellious Angels: Studies in Second Temple Judaism and New Testament Texts (WUNT, 335; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
48.
SwintonJohn2000From Bedlam to Shalom: Towards a Practical Theology of Human Nature, Interpersonal Relationships, and Mental Health Care (New York, NY: Peter Lang).
49.
ToensingHolly Joan2007 ‘Living among the Tombs: Society, Mental Illness, and Self-Destruction in Mark 5:1-20’, in AvalosHectorMelcherSarah J.SchipperJeremy (eds), This Abled Body: Rethinking Disabilities in Biblical Studies (Semeia Studies, 52; Atlanta, GA: SBL Press): 131–43.
50.
TwelftreeGraham H.1993Jesus the Exorcist: A Contribution to the Study of the Historical Jesus (WUNT, 2/54; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
51.
WaetjenHerman C.1989A Reordering of Power: A Socio-Political Reading of Mark’s Gospel (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
52.
WinnAdam2008The Purpose of Mark’s Gospel: An Early Christian Response to Roman Imperial Propaganda (WUNT, 2/245; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
53.
WredeWilliam1971 [1901] The Messianic Secret (trans. GreigJ. C. G.; Library of Theological Translations; Cambridge and London: James Clarke).
