Most contemporary scholars maintain that James’s Greek is highly sophisticated. Those who understand James to be pseudepigraphical view the letter’s Greek as evidence against its authenticity, while many of those who defend the traditional view of the authorship of James account for the letter’s Greek by positing the amanuensis hypothesis. Underlying both of these approaches is a mostly unquestioned acceptance of a high view of the letter’s Greek. This article seeks to advance the debate over the authorship of James by challenging the standard view of the letter’s Greek and by evaluating recent work on secretarial assistance in Greco-Roman letter writing.
AdamA. K. M.2013James: A Handbook on the Greek Text (BHGNT; Waco: Baylor University Press).
2.
AdamsJ. N.JanseMarkSwainSimon (eds.) 2002Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
3.
AdamsonJames B.1989James: The Man and His Message (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
4.
AlettiJean Noël2014 ‘James 2:14–26: The Arrangement and Its Meaning’, Bib95: 88–101.
5.
AllisonDale C.Jr.2013A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James (ICC; New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark).
6.
BaaslandErnst1988 ‘Literarische Form, Thematik und geschichtliche Einordnung des Jakobusbriefes’, in HaaseW.TemporiniH. (eds.), Aufstieg und Hiedergang der Römischen Welt (New York: de Gruyter): 3646–84.
7.
BarclayJohn M. G.1987 ‘Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case’, JSNT31: 73–93.
8.
BauckhamRichard1999James: Wisdom of James, Disciple of Jesus the Sage (NTR; London: Routledge).
9.
BergerKlaus1974 ‘Apostelbrief und apostolische Rede/Zum Formular frühchristlicher Briefe’, ZNW65: 190–231.
10.
BothaPieter J. J.2012 ‘Writing in the First Century’, in Orality and Literacy in Early Christianity (BPC 5; Eugene: Cascade): 62–88.
11.
BrookinsTimothy A.2022Ancient Rhetoric and the Style of Paul’s Letters: A Reference Book (Eugene: Cascade).
12.
CeccarelliPaola2013Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600 BC–150 BC) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
13.
ClarkDonald Lemen1957Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education (New York: Columbia University Press).
EhrmanBart D.2013Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
16.
ElliottJohn H.1993 ‘The Epistle of James in Rhetorical and Social Scientific Perspective: Holiness-Wholeness and Patterns of Replication’, BTB23: 71–81.
17.
ErasmusDesiderius1993Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: Galatians to the Apocalypse: Facsimile of the Final Latin Text with All Earlier Variants (ed. ReeveAnne; SHCT 52; Leiden: Brill).
18.
FitzmyerJoseph A.1970 ‘Languages of Palestine in the First Century A.D’, CBQ32: 501–31.
19.
FrankemölleHubert1990 ‘Das semantische Netz des Jakobusbriefes: Zur Einheit eines umstrittenen Briefes’, BZ34: 161–97.
HengelMartin1989The ‘Hellenization’ of Judea in the First Century after Christ (Eugene: Wipf & Stock).
23.
Jackson-McCabeMatt2009 ‘The Politics of Pseudepigraphy and the Letter of James’, in FreyJörgHerzerJensJanßenMartinaRothschildClare K. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in Frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 599–623.
24.
Jackson-McCabeMatt2019 ‘The Letter of James and Hellenistic Philosophy’, in MasonEric F.LockettDarian R. (eds.), Reading the Epistle of James: A Resource for Students (RBS 94; Atlanta: SBL): 45–71.
25.
JobesKaren H.20221 Peter (2nd ed.; BECNT; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
26.
JohnsonLuke Timothy1995The Letter of James: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB 37a; Garden City: Doubleday).
27.
JongCasper C. de2014 ‘Style (Léxis), Ancient Theories of’, in GiannakisGeorgios K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics (Leiden: Brill): 326–31.
28.
JónssonSigurvin Lárus2021James among the Classicists: Reading the Letter of James in Light of Ancient Literary Criticism (SANT 8; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
29.
KennedyGeorge A.1994A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
30.
KittelGerhard1942 ‘Der geschichtliche Ort des Jakobusbriefes’, ZNW41: 71–105.
31.
KloppenborgJohn S.2022 ‘The Author of James and His Lexical Profile’, in BeckerEve-MarieJónssonSigurvin LárusLutherSusanne (eds.), Who Was ‘James’? Essays on the Letter’s Authorship and Provenance Resulting from a Conference on the Occasion of Oda Wischmeyer’s 75th Birthday (WUNT 485; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 197–218.
32.
LausbergHeinrich1998Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (eds. OrtonDavid E.AndersonR. Dean; trans. BlissMatthew T.JansenAnnemiekOrtonDavid E.; Leiden: Brill).
33.
MayorJoseph B.1913The Epistle of St. James: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Comments (3rd ed.; London: Macmillan).
34.
McCartneyDan2009James (BECNT; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
35.
McKnightScot2011The Letter of James (NICNT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
36.
MetzgerBruce M.1994A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (4th ed.; Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft).
37.
MooDouglas J.2021The Letter of James (2nd ed.; PNTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2021.
38.
MullenAlexJamesPatrick (eds.) 2012Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
NienhuisDavid R.2007Not by Paul Alone: The Formation of the Catholic Epistle Collection and the Christian Canon (Waco: Baylor University Press).
41.
OngHughson T.2015 ‘Ancient Palestine Is Multilingual and Diglossic: Introducing Multilingualism Theories to New Testament Studies’, CBR13: 330–50.
42.
PainterJohn2005 ‘The Power of Words: Rhetoric in James and Paul’, in ChiltonBruceEvansCraig (eds.), The Missions of James, Peter, and Paul: Tensions in Early Christianity (NovTSup, 115; Leiden: Brill): 235–73.
43.
PennerTodd C.1996The Epistle of James and Eschatology: Re-Reading an Ancient Christian Letter (JSNTSup, 121; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic).
44.
PoirierJohn C.2007 ‘The Linguistic Situation in Jewish Palestine in Late Antiquity’, JGRChJ4: 55–134.
45.
PriorMichael1996Review of E. Randolph Richards, The Secretary in the Letters of Paul, HeyJ37: 87–89.
46.
ReeceSteve2017Paul’s Large Letters: Paul’s Autographic Subscriptions in the Light of Ancient Epistolary Conventions (LNTS, 561; London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark).
47.
RichardsE. Randolph1991The Secretary in the Letters of Paul (WUNT 2.42; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
48.
RichardsE. Randolph2000 ‘Silvanus Was Not Peter’s Secretary: Theological Bias in Interpreting Δια Σιλουαψου … Εγραψα in 1 Peter 5:12’, JETS43: 417–32.
49.
RichardsE. Randolph2004Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity).
50.
RichardsE. Randolph2011 ‘Will the Real Author Please Stand Up? The Author in Greco-Roman Letter Writing’, in CopanPaulCraigWilliam Lane (eds.), Come Let Us Reason: New Essays in Christian Apologetics (Nashville: B&H Academic): 113–36.
RobertsW. Rhys1963Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism (New York: Cooper Square).
53.
RobertsonA. T.1919Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (3rd ed.; London: Hodder & Stoughton).
54.
RopesJames Hardy1916A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of St. James (ICC; New York: Scribner’s).
55.
RoweGalen O.1997 ‘Style’, in PorterStanley E. (ed.) Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400) (Leiden: Brill): 121–58.
56.
RungeSteven E.2010Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament: A Practical Introduction for Teaching and Exegesis (Peabody: Hendrickson).
57.
SarriAntonia2018Material Aspects of Letter Writing in the Graeco-Roman World: 500 BC–AD 300 (MT 12; Berlin: de Gruyter).
58.
SaxbyAlan2015James, Brother of Jesus, and the Jerusalem Church: A Radical Exploration of Christian Origins (Eugene: Wipf & Stock).
59.
SevensterJ. N.1968Do You Know Greek? How Much Greek Could the First Jewish Christian Have Known? (NovTSup, 19; Leiden: Brill).
60.
SilvaMoisés1980 ‘Bilingualism and the Character of Palestinian Greek’, Bib61: 198–219.
61.
SmithCraig A.2010 ‘The Development of Style (Fifth Century BCE to Second Century CE) and the Consequences for Understanding the Style of the New Testament’, JGRChJ7: 9–31.
62.
SmythHerbert Weir1956Greek Grammar (rev. Gordon M. Messing; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
63.
StirewaltM. LutherJr.2003Paul the Letter Writer (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
64.
ThurénLauri1995 ‘Risky Rhetoric in James’, NovT37: 262–84.
65.
TrappMichael (ed.) 2003Greek and Latin Letters: An Anthology, with Translation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
66.
TurnerE. G.1987Greek Manuscripts of the Ancient World (2nd ed.; BullSup, 46; London: Institute of Classical Studies).
67.
WachobWesley Hiram2000The Voice of Jesus in the Social Rhetoric of James (SNTSMS, 106; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
68.
WatsonDuane F.1993a ‘James 2 in Light of Greco-Roman Schemes of Argumentation’, NTS39: 94–121.
69.
WatsonDuane F.1993b ‘The Rhetoric of James 3:1–12 and a Classical Pattern of Argumentation’, NovT35: 48–64.
70.
WatsonDuane F.2007 ‘An Assessment of the Rhetoric and Rhetorical Analysis of the Letter of James’, in WebbRobert L.KloppenborgJohn S. (eds.), Reading James with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James (LNTS, 342; London: T&T Clark): 99–120.
71.
WeimaJeffrey A. D.1992Review of E. Randolph Richards, The Secretary in the Letters of Paul, NovT34: 300–302.
72.
WifstrandAlfred2005 ‘Stylistic Problems in the Epistles of James and Peter’, in RydbeckLarsPorterStanley E. (eds.), Epochs and Styles: Selected Writings on the New Testament, Greek Language and Greek Culture in the Post-Classical Era (trans. SearbyDenis; WUNT, 179; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 46–58.
73.
WilliamsTravis B.2023 ‘The Amanuensis Hypothesis in New Testament Scholarship: Its Origin, Evidential Basis, and Application’, CBR22: 7–82.
74.
WilliamsTravis B.HorrellDavid G.2023A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on 1 Peter (vol. 2; ICC; London: T&T Clark, 2023).
75.
WischmeyerOda2022 ‘Spiritual Classicism? The Letter of James as an Early Christian Literary Document’, in BeckerEve-MarieJónssonSigurvin LárusLutherSusanne (eds.), Who Was ‘James’? Essays on the Letter’s Authorship and Provenance Resulting from a Conference on the Occasion of Oda Wischmeyer’s 75th Birthday (WUNT, 485; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 277–312.
76.
WuellnerWilhelm H.1978 ‘Der Jakobusbrief im Licht Rhetorik und Textpragmatik’, LB43: 5–66.
77.
ZahnTheodor1909Introduction to the New Testament (vol. 1; trans. TroutJohn MooreMatherWilliam ArnotHodousLouisWorcesterEdward StrongWorrellWilliam HoytDodgeRowland Backus; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
