Did Paul intend for Philemon to manumit Onesimus? This article aims to present evidence in support of a manumissive view of Paul’s communicative intent to Philemon. Through a cognitive functional approach to discourse analysis, the sentence comprising vv. 15–16 is proposed to represent the peak of the epistle. Coincidingly, this central statement of the letter is precisely where Paul discusses the enslavement of Onesimus. There, through his linguistic choices, Paul construes emphatic discontinuity in Onesimus’s status, resulting in the most salient change in Philemon’s mental representation: Onesimus is no longer a slave, but beyond a slave, a beloved brother.
AllenDavid A.2020 ‘Philemon’, in ScacewaterTodd A. (ed.) Discourse Analysis of the New Testament Writings (Dallas Fontes): 521–39.
2.
AubreyMichaelAubreyRachel2020Greek Prepositions in the New Testament: A Cognitive-Functional Description (Lexham Research Lexicons; Bellingham, WA: Lexham).
3.
BarclayJohn M. G.1991 ‘Paul, Philemon and the Dilemma of Christian Slave-Ownership’, NTS37: 161–86.
4.
BealeG. K.2019Colossians and Philemon (BECNT; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
5.
BirnerBetty J.2013Introduction to Pragmatics (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics; Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).
6.
BrownGillianYuleGeorge1983Discourse Analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7.
CookWalter A.1978Introduction to Tagmemic Analysis (Washington: Georgetown University Press).
8.
DooleyRobert A.LevinsohnStephen H.2001Analyzing Discourse: A Manual of Basic Concepts (Dallas: SIL International).
9.
DunnJames D. G.1996The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
10.
EvansVyvyan2019Cognitive Linguistics: A Complete Guide (2nd ed.; Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
11.
HallidayMichael A. K.HasanRuqaiya1976Cohesion in English (English Language Series; London: Routledge).
12.
HellmanChristian2011 ‘The Notion of Coherence in Discourse’, in GertRickheitHabelChristopher (eds.), Focus and Coherence in Discourse Processing (Berlin: sDe Gruyter): 190–203.
KrcmarMarinaHaberkornKristen2020 ‘Mental Representations’, in
van den BulckJanRoskos-EwoldsenDavid R. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons): 1–17.
15.
LakoffGeorge1990 ‘The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?’, Cognitive Linguistics1: 39–74.
16.
LambrechtKnud1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 71; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17.
LevinsohnStephen2020 ‘Discourse Analysis: Galatians as a Case Study’, in BlackDavid AlanMerkleBenjamin L. (eds.), Linguistics and New Testament Greek: Key Issues in the Current Debate (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic): 103–25.
18.
LohseEduard1971Colossians and Philemon: A Commentary on the Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress).
19.
LongacreRobert E.1985 ‘Discourse Peak as Zone of Turbulence’, in WirthJessica R. (ed.), Beyond the Sentence: Discourse and Sentential Form (Ann Arbor: Karoma): 81–98.
20.
LongacreRobert E.1996The Grammar of Discourse (2nd ed.; Topics in Language and Linguistics; New York: Plenum).
21.
LouwJ.P.NidaEugene A., 1989Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (New York: United Bible Societies).
22.
MathewsonDavid2021Voice and Mood: A Linguistic Approach (Essentials of Biblical Greek Grammar; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
23.
MazzoneMarco2020 ‘Cognitive Pragmatics’, in WenXuTaylorJohn R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics; New York: Routledge).
24.
McKnightScot2017The Letter to Philemon (NICNT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
25.
MooDouglas2008The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon (PNTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
26.
NidaEugene1991Style and Discourse: With Special Reference to the Text of the Greek New Testament (2nd ed; Cape Town: Bible Society).
27.
NordlingJohn G.2004Philemon (Concordia Commentary; Saint Louis: Concordia).
28.
PaoDavid W.2012Colossians & Philemon (ZECNT; Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
29.
ReboulAnneMoeschlerJacques1998Pragmatique du discours: de l’interprétation de l’énoncé à l’interprétation du discours (Collection U Série ‘Linguistique’; Paris: Armand Colin).
30.
ReinhartTanya1980 ‘Conditions for Text Coherence’, Poetics Today1: 161–80.
31.
RungeSteven E.2010Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament: A Practical Introduction for Teaching and Exegesis (Peabody Hendrickson).
32.
ScacewaterTodd A.2020 ‘Introduction: Discourse Analysis: History, Topics, and Applications,’ in ScacewaterTodd A. (ed.), Discourse Analysis of the New Testament Writings (Dallas: Fontes): 1–29.
33.
SnymanA. H.1991 ‘A Semantic Discourse Analysis of the Letter to Philemon’, in HartinP. J.PetzerJ. H.MetzgerBruce M. (eds.), Text and Interpretation: New Approaches in the Criticism of the New Testament (NTTS, 15; Leiden: Brill): 83–101.
34.
SperberDanWilsonDeirdre1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.; Oxford: Blackwell).
35.
TenbrinkThora2020Cognitive Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
36.
WrightN. T.2008Colossians and Philemon: An Introduction and Commentary (TNTC; Downers Grove: InterVarsity).
37.
WitheringtonBen2007The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
38.
YoungStephen E.2021Our Brother Beloved: Purpose and Community in Paul’s Letter to Philemon (Waco: Baylor University Press).
