This article examines the role of the performance of frankness in the work of Philo of Alexandria and in the book of Acts. With respect to Philo, the differences are highlighted in the use of παρρησία between the various series of his writings. With respect to Acts, the role of scripture is emphasized in authorizing the frankness of the disciples. Comparing both, it is argued that the performance of frankness functions as a means to display inner freedom for Jews in the Roman Empire (for Philo) and for Christians within Jewish synagogues in the Roman Empire (for Acts), a freedom that consists of a sense of dignity and status. The comparison demonstrates the extent to which Philo and the book of Acts participate in a shared Roman discourse from Jewish perspectives.
AllisonM.E.1993The Motif of Parrhesia in Acts (PhD dissertation, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary).
2.
Artman-PartockTali2010Dialogue and Dialogism in Rabbinic Literature: Parrhesia in Theory and in Practice in Rabbinic Literature and in Contemporary Christian Literature (PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem).
3.
BarrettC.K.1994, 1998A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles (ICC, 2 vols; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
4.
BartelinkG.J.M.1970 ‘Quelques observations sur παρρησία dans la littérature paléo-chrétienne’, Graecitas et Latinitas Christianorum Primaeva, Supplementa3: 6-57.
5.
BormannLukas2017Theologie des Neuen Testaments: Grundlinien und wichtigste Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
6.
BosmanPhilip2006 ‘Conscience and Free Speech in Philo’, SPhA18: 33-47.
7.
CarterD.M.2004‘Citizen Attribute, Negative Right: A Conceptual Difference between Ancient and Modern Ideas of Freedom of Speech’, in SluiterI.RosenR.M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity (Leiden: Brill): 197-220.
8.
CoverMichael2018 ‘Review of Maren R. Niehoff, Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography’, Classical World112: 735-37.
9.
DekkerJaap2015‘Licht voor de volken. Lucas’ gebruik van Jesaja 49.6 in Handelingen 13.47’, in den HertogG.C.MulderM.C.van SpanjeT.E. (eds.), Acta: Bundel ter gelegenheid van het afscheid van prof.dr. T.M. Hofman als hoogleraar aan de Theologische Universiteit Apeldoorn (Heerenveen: Groen): 55-66.
10.
DillonJohn1977The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (London: Duckworth).
11.
FieldsDana F.2021Frankness, Greek Culture, and the Roman Empire (Abingdon: Routledge).
12.
FoucaultMichel2019Discourse & Truth and Parrēsia (ed. FruchaudH.-P.LorenziniDaniele; Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press).
13.
FrazierFrançois2002 ‘Les visages de Joseph dans le De Josepho’, SPhA14: 1-30.
14.
HeijerArco den2021Portraits of Paul’s Performance in the Book of Acts: Luke’s Apologetic Strategy in the Depiction of Paul as Messenger of God (WUNT, 2.556; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
15.
HessKatja2019Rhetor, Philosoph, Geistträger: Die Bildungsthematik in der Lukanischen Paulusdarstellung (FB, 137; Würzburg: Echter Verlag).
16.
JohnsonLuke T.1992The Acts of the Apostles (Sacra Pagina, 5; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
17.
KemmlerDieter W.1975Faith and Human Reason: A Study of Paul’s Method of Preaching as Illustrated by 1–2 Thessalonians and Acts 17, 2-4 (Leiden: Brill).
18.
KoetBart J.1989Five Studies on Interpretation of Scripture in Luke–Acts (Leuven: Leuven University Press; Peeters).
19.
KonstanDavid2004‘Friendship, Frankness and Flattery’, in SluiterI.RosenR.M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity (Mnemosyne Supplements, 254; Leiden: Brill): 7-19.
20.
KonstanDavid2005‘Friendship and Patronage’, in HarrisonS. (ed.), A Companion to Latin Literature (Oxford: Blackwell): 345-59.
21.
KonstanDavid2012 ‘The Two Faces of Parrhêsia: Free Speech and Self-Expression in Ancient Greece’, Antichthon46: 1-13.
22.
KoskenniemiErkki2019Greek Writers and Philosophers in Philo and Josephus: A Study of their Secular Education and Educational Ideals (Studies in Philo of Alexandria, 9; Leiden: Brill).
23.
LaurandValérie2015‘Puissance de la parole. Louer Dieu d’ “une bouche que rien ne freine” (Her. 110)’, in CalabiF.MunnichO.Reydams-SchilsG. (eds.), Pouvoir et puissances chez Philon d’Alexandrie (Monothéismes et Philosophie; Turnhout: Brepols): 61-77.
24.
LeppinHartmut2022Paradoxe der Parrhesie: Eine antike Wortgeschichte (Tria Corda, 20; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
25.
LévyCarlos2009 ‘From Politics to Philosophy and Theology: Some Remarks about Foucault’s Interpretation of Parrêsia in Two Recently Published Seminars’, Philosophy and Rhetoric42: 313-25.
LoopikMarcus van1991The Ways of the Sages and the Way of the World: The Minor Tractates of the Babylonian Talmud: Derekh ’Eretz Rabbah, Derekh ’Eretz Zuta, Pereq Ha-Shalom (TSAJ, 26; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
28.
MalherbeAbraham J.1989 ‘“Not in a Corner”: Early Christian Apologetic in Acts 26.26’, in Paul and the Popular Philosophers (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress): 147-63.
29.
MarrowStanley B.1982a ‘Parrhēsia and the New Testament’, CBQ44: 431-46.
30.
MarrowStanley B.1982b Speaking the Word Fearlessly: Boldness in the New Testament (New York: Paulist Press).
31.
MomiglianoArnoldo1973‘Freedom of Speech in Antiquity’, in WienerP.P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas (vol. 2; New York: Scribner): 252-63.
32.
NeumannNils2018‘Παρρησία in Erzähltexten: Handlungsschemata bei Lukian und in der Apostelgeschichte’, in SmitP.-B.van UrkE. (eds.), Parrhesia: Ancient and Modern Perspectives on Freedom of Speech (STAR, 25; Leiden: Brill): 60-79.
33.
NiehoffMaren2005‘New Garments for Biblical Joseph’, in HelmerC. (ed.), Biblical Interpretation: History, Context and Reality (SymS, 26; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature): 33-56.
34.
NiehoffMaren2018Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
35.
OerteltFriederike2014Herrscherideal und Herrschaftskritik bei Philo von Alexandria: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel seiner Josephsdarstellung in De Josepho und De Somniis II (Studies in Philo of Alexandria, 8; Leiden: Brill).
36.
PatelShaily Shashikant2021 ‘Notes on Rehabilitating “Magic” in the Study of Early Christian Literature’, Religion Compass 15.10. https.//doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12415.
37.
PetersonE.1923 ‘Der Gottesfreund. Beiträge zur Geschichte eines religiösen Terminus’, ZKG42: 161-202.
38.
PetersonE.1929‘Zur Bedeutungsgeschichte von ΠΑΡΡΗΣΙΑ’, in KoeppW. (ed.), Reinhold-Seeberg-Festschrift (Leipzig: Deichert): 283-97.
39.
PetersonE.2018 ‘Zur Bedeutungsgeschichte von ΠΑΡΡΗΣΙΑ’, in R. Campe and M. Wessels, Bella Parrhesia: Begriff und Figur der freien Rede in der Frühen Neuzeit (Freiburg i.Br: Rombach): 347-63.
40.
PétitMadeleine1974Quod omnis probus liber sit: Introduction, texte, traduction et notes (Paris: Cerf).
41.
RaaflaubKurt A.2004‘Aristocracy and Freedom of Speech in the Greco-Roman World’, in SluiterI.RosenR.M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity (Mnemosyne Supplements, 254; Leiden: Brill): 41-62.
42.
Reydams-SchilsGretchen2005The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
43.
ScarpatGiuseppe1964Parrhesia: Storia del termine e delle sue traduzione in Latino (Brescia: Paideia).
SmoldersD.1958 ‘L’audace de l’apôtre selon Saint Paul. Le thème de la Parrêsia’, Collectanea Mechliniensia43: 16-30, 117-33.
47.
StowersStanley K.1994A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
48.
StraitDrew J.2015Gods, Kings and Benefactors: Resisting the Ruling Power in Early Judaism and Paul’s Polemic Against Iconic Spectacle in Acts 17.16-32 (PhD dissertation, University of Pretoria).
49.
StroupChristophe2020The Christians who Became Jews: Acts of the Apostles and Ethnicity in the Roman City (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
50.
TomsonPeter J.2018‘Josephus, Luke–Acts, and Politics in Rome and Judaea by 100 CE’, in SchwartzJ.TomsonP.J. (eds.), Jews and Christians in the First and Second Centuries: The Interbellum 70–132 CE (CRINT, 15; Leiden: Brill): 427-54.
51.
Tops, Thomas Forthcoming ‘A Historical-Comparative Study of the Authorisation of παρρησία in Philo’s Quis rerum divinarum heres sit and Quod omnis probus liber sit’, JSJ.
52.
Tops2022Paroimia and Parrēsia in the Gospel of John: A Historical-Hermeneutical Study (WUNT, 2.565; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
53.
UnnikW.C. van1980 ‘The Christian’s Freedom of Speech in the New Testament’, in Sparsa Collecta, Part 2. 1 Peter, Canon, Corpus Hellenisticum, Generalia (Leiden: Brill): 269-89.
54.
WendtHeidi2016At the Temple Gates: The Religion of Freelance Experts in the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
55.
WienerHélène2018 ‘Le Péri Parrhêsias de Philodème de Gadara et la parrhêsia dans les Actes des apôtres’, ETR93: 301-16.
56.
WinterSara C.1996 ‘Παρρησία in Acts’, in FitzgeraldJ.T. (ed.), Friendship, Flattery, and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World (NovTSup, 82; Leiden: Brill): 185-202.
