Rhetorical Chain-Link Construction and the Relationship between Romans 7.1-6 and 7.7–8.39: Additional Evidence for Assessing the Argument of Romans 7–8 and the Identity of the Infamous ‘I’
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2017
Rhetorical Chain-Link Construction and the Relationship between Romans 7.1-6 and 7.7–8.39: Additional Evidence for Assessing the Argument of Romans 7–8 and the Identity of the Infamous ‘I’
Scholars often find structural and/or logical deficiencies in Rom. 7.1-6 and 7.7–8.39. Such findings often lead to confusion regarding the argument of Rom. 7–8. Bruce Longenecker’s identification of chain-link construction in 7.7–8.39 convincingly resolves many problems, but 7.1-6 remains in the lurch. A similar examination of 7.1-6, however, clarifies the structure and argument of that passage, its relationship to 7.7–8.39, and the argument of Rom. 7–8 as a whole. Indeed, 7.1-6 anticipates the structure and content of 7.7–8.39 through its own miniature chain-link construction. This provides not only additional but significant evidence for the rhetorical function of 7.1-6, the argument of Rom. 7–8 and the identity of the infamous ‘I’ in Rom. 7.7-25.
AshtonJohn2000The Religion of Paul the Apostle (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
2.
BestErnst1967The Letter of Paul to the Romans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3.
BultmannRudolf1967‘Glossen im Römerbrief’, in Rudolf Bultmann, Exegetica: Aufsätze zur Erforschung des Neuen Testaments (ed. DinklerErich; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck]): 278-84.
CampbellDouglas2009The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
6.
CranfieldC.E.B.1980The Epistle to the Romans (repr.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
7.
DoddC.H.1946The Epistle of Paul to the Romans (repr.; MNTC; London: Hodder & Stoughton).
8.
DunnJames D.G.1988Romans 1–8 (WBC, 38a; Dallas: Word Books).
9.
DunnJames D.G.1998The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
10.
ElliottNeil2007The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul’s Dialogue with Judaism (JSNTSup, 45; repr.; Minneapolis: Fortress Press; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990).
11.
FitzmyerJoseph2008Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (repr.; AB, 33; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
12.
GaventaBeverly Roberts2007Our Mother Saint Paul (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press).
13.
GaventaBeverly Roberts2013‘The Shape of the “I”: The Psalter, the Gospel, and the Speaker of Romans 7’, in GaventaBeverly Roberts (ed.), Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans5–8 (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press): 77-91.
14.
HartJohn F.2013‘Paul as Weak in Faith in Romans 7.7-25’, BSac170: 317-43.
15.
HultgrenArland2011Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
16.
JewettRobert2007Romans: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
17.
KäsemannErnst1980Commentary on Romans (trans. BromileyGeoffrey W.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
KilburnK. (ed. and trans.) 1959Lucian (vol. 6; LCL, 430; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
20.
KingJustin2016‘Speech-in-Character, Diatribe, and Romans 3.1-9: Who’s Speaking When and Why it Matters’, PhD Dissertation, Baylor University, USA.
21.
LongeneckerBruce1991Eschatology and the Covenant: A Comparison of 4 Ezra and Romans1–11 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
22.
LongeneckerBruce2005Rhetoric at the Boundaries: The Art and Theology of the New Testament Chain-Link Transitions (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
23.
MeyerPaul W.1990‘The Worm at the Core of the Apple: Exegetical Reflections on Romans 7’, in FortnaRobert T.GaventaBeverly R. (eds.), The Conversation Continues: Studies in Paul and John in Honor of J. Louis Martyn (Nashville: Abingdon Press): 62-97.
24.
MiddendorfMichael P.2013Romans 1–8 (Concordia Commentary: A Theological Exposition of Sacred Scripture; Saint Louis: Concordia).
25.
RussellDonald A. (ed. and trans.) 2001Quintilian: The Orator’s Education (vol. 4; LCL, 127; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
26.
SmythHerbert Weir1984Greek Grammar (rev. edn; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
27.
Stanley Stowers1994A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
28.
Stanley Stowers1995‘Romans 7.7-25 as a Speech-in-Character (προσωποποιία)’, in Engberg-PedersenTroels (ed.), Paul in his Hellenistic Context (Minneapolis: Fortress Press): 180-202.
29.
Stanley Stowers2003‘Apostrophe, Προσωποποιία, and Paul’s Rhetorical Education’, in FitzgeraldJohn T.OlbrichtThomas H.WhiteL. Michael (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham J. Malherbe (NovTSup, 110; Leiden: Brill): 351-69.
30.
StuhlmacherPeter1994Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Commentary (trans. HafemannScott J.; Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox).
31.
TobinThomas H.2004Paul’s Rhetoric in its Contexts: The Argument of Romans (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
32.
WilckensUlrich1980Der Brief an die Römer (Röm6–11) (EKKNT, 6.2; Neukirchen-Vluyn; Neukirchener Verlag).
33.
WrightN.T.2002The New Interpreter’s Bible. X. The Letter to the Romans: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections (Nashville: Abingdon Press).
34.
WrightN.T.2013Paul and the Faithfulness of God (2 vols.; Christian Origins and the People of God, 4; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013).
35.
ZieslerJohn1989Paul’s Letter to the Romans (London: SCM Press).
