‘The Healing of Blind Bartimaeus’, as Mk 10.46-52 is often called, has been taken over and restated with various changes in Lk. 18.35-43. This article views Luke’s modification of the account in terms of πάράφράσις (‘paraphrase’), a progymnasmatic exercise in which the writer changed the form of expression while keeping the thoughts. It is argued that Luke’s πάράφράσις of Mark’s account enhances characterization of three characters— Jesus, the λάός (‘people’) and the ‘blind man’—by creating a favorable portrait of each of them over against some respective inferior counterpart.
Braun, W.1995Feasting and Social Rhetoric in Luke 14 (SNTSMS, 85;Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7.
Brodie, T.L.1989‘The Departure for Jerusalem (Luke 9:51-56) as a Rhetorical Imitation of Elijah’s Departure for the Jordan (2 Kgs 1.1-2:6)’ , Bib70: 96-109.
8.
1990‘Luke-Acts as an Imitation and Emulation of the Elijah-Elisha Narrative’, in E. Richard (ed.), New Views on Luke and Acts (Collegeville, MN: Snow Lion): 78-85.
9.
Bultmann, R.K.1958Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition ( FRLANT, 12; Göttingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1958 ).
10.
Burger, C.1970 Jesus als Davidssohn: Eine traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung (FRLANT, 98;Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970).
11.
Charlesworth, J.H. (ed.) 2006The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
12.
Collins, J.J.1994‘Works of the Messiah’, DSD1: 198-212.
13.
1995The Scepter and the Star (New York: Doubleday).
14.
Conzelmann, H.1982The Theology of St. Luke (Philadelphia : Fortress Press).
15.
Cribiore, R.2001Gymnastics of the Mind (Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press).
16.
Croatto, J.S.2005‘Jesus, Prophet Like Elijah, and Prophet-Teacher Like Moses in Luke-Acts’, JBL124: 451-65.
17.
Culpepper, R.A.1994‘Seeing the Kingdom of God: The Metaphor of Sight in the Gospel of Luke’, CurTM21: 434-43.
18.
1995Luke (NIB, 9; Nashville: Abingdon Press).
19.
Dahl, N.A.1958‘A People for his Name’, NTS4: 319-27.
20.
Dawsey, J.M.1989‘Mathetai (autou) and Luke’s Concern for the Sound of his Gospel’, Melita Theologica40: 59-62.
21.
Dibelius, M.1933Formgeschichte des Evangeliums (Tübingen: Mohr).
22.
Green, J.B.1997The Gospel of Luke (NICNT;Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
23.
Hamm, D.1986‘Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke’ , Bib67: 457-77.
24.
Hartsock, C.2008Sight and Blindness in Luke-Acts: The Use of Physical Features in Characterization (Biblical Interpretation Series, 94; Leiden: Brill).
25.
Hock, R.F.1987‘Lazarus and Micyllus: Greco-Roman Backgrounds to Luke 16:19-31’, JBL106: 447-63.
26.
Johnson, L.T.1991The Gospel of Luke (SP, 3;Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
27.
Kennedy, G.A.1984New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
28.
2003Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Writings from the Greco-Roman World, 10; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
29.
Kodell, J.1969‘Luke’s Use of Laos, "People", Especially in the Jerusalem Narrative (Lk 19,28-24, 53)’, CBQ31: 327-43.
30.
Kurz, W.S.1994‘Intertextual Use of Sirach 48:1-16 in Plotting Luke-Acts’ , in C.A. Evans and R. Stegner (eds.), Gospels and the Scriptures of Israel (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press): 308-24.
31.
Lausberg, H.1998Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (trans. M.T. Bliss, A. Jansen and D.E. Orton; ed. D.E. Orton and R.D. Anderson; Leiden: Brill).
32.
Malbon, E.S.1991Narrative Space and Mythic Meaning in Mark (The Biblical Seminar, 13;Sheffield: JSOT Press ).
33.
Martin, M.2004‘Progymnasmatic Topic Lists: A Compositional Template for Luke and Other Bioi?’, NTS58: 18-41.
34.
Meynet, R.1988L’évangile selon saint Luc: Analyse rhétorique (2 vols.; Paris: Cerf).
35.
Morgan, T.1998Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
36.
Morgenthaler, R.1993Lukas und Quintilian: Rhetorik als Erzählkunst (Zürich : Gotthelf).
37.
O’Fearghail, F.1991The Introduction to Luke-Acts: A Study of the Role of Luke 1,1-4,44 in the Composition of Luke’s Two-Volume Work ( AnBib, 126; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute).
38.
Parsons, M.2007Luke: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist (Peabody, MA : Hendrickson).
39.
Patillon, M.1997Progymnasmata: Aelius Theon (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).
40.
Penner, T.1996‘Narrative as Persuasion: Epideictic Rhetoric and Scribal Amplification in the Stephen Episode in Acts’, SBLSP35: 352-67.
41.
Philipose, J.1992‘Kurios in Luke: A Diagnosis’, Biblical Interpreter43: 325-33.
42.
Porter, S.E. (ed.) 1997Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.-A.D. 400 . (Leiden: Brill).
43.
Powell, M.A.1990‘The Religious Leaders in Luke: A Literary-Critical Study’, JBL109: 93-110.
44.
Reid, John.1900-1901‘"Lord" and "the Lord" in the Gospels’ , ExpTim: 425-30.
45.
Robbins, V.1987‘The Woman who Touched Jesus’ Garments: Socio-Rhetorical Composition and Pre-Gospel Traditions: A New Approach’, in C. Focant (ed.), The Synoptic Gospels: Source Criticism and the New Literary Criticism (BETL, 110; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 111-47.
46.
1998‘From Enthymeme to Theology in Luke 11:1-13’, in R.P. Thompson and T.E. Phillips (eds.), Literary Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays in Honor of Joseph B. Tyson (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press): 191-214.
47.
Rowe, G.O.1997‘Style’, in S.E. Porter (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.-A.D. 400 (Leiden: Brill): 121-58.
48.
Satterthwaite, P.E.1993‘Acts against the Background of Classical Rhetoric’ , in B.W. Winter and A.D. Clarke (eds.), The Book of Acts in Its First Century Setting. I. The Book of Acts in its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 337-79.
49.
Shuler, P.1998‘The Rhetorical Character of Luke 1-2’, in T. Phillips and R. Thompson (eds.), Literary Studies in Luke-Acts (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press): 173-89.
50.
Smith, A.1999‘"Full of Spirit and Wisdom": Luke’s Portrait of Stephen (6:1-8:1a) as a Man of Self-Mastery’, in L.E. Vaage and V.L. Wimbush (eds.), Asceticism and the New Testament (New York: Routledge): 97-114.
51.
Strba, B.2006‘Warum Steht in Lk 18,38 Eboēsen?’, Biblische Notizen128: 43-59.
52.
Summers, R.1972Commentary on Luke: Jesus, the Universal Savior (Waco, TX: Word Books).
Wuellner, W.1997‘Arrangement’, in S.E. Porter (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.-A.D. 400 (Leiden: Brill): 51-88.
