The parallel between Jesus and Elijah in the account of the Samaritan village (Lk. 9.51-56; cf. 2 Kgs 1.1-16), though recognized for centuries, has almost always been seen as a negative one. Whether for reasons of typology, eschatology or as a polemic against violent judgment, scholars tend to argue that this passage distances Jesus from the OT prophet. This article examines the passage in light of the Elijah motif running throughout Luke–Acts, which is consistent in creating a positive link between Jesus and Elijah, especially in regard to compassion towards outsiders. In this light, the Lukan narrative presents Jesus’ refusal to summon heavenly fire on the Samaritans as a truly Elijianic act. By contrast, the disciples, though attempting to emulate the Tishbite’s actions, are ironically found to be in every way unlike Elijah.
AlexanderLoveday2005 ‘Reading Luke–Acts from Back to Front’, in AlexanderLoveday, Acts in its Ancient Literary Context (New York: T&T Clark): 207-30.
2.
AllisonDale C.Jr2002 ‘Rejecting Violent Judgment: Luke 9.52-56 and its Relatives’, JBL121: 459-78.
3.
BockDarrell L.1994Luke 1.1–9.50 (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
4.
BockDarrell L.1996Luke 9.51–24.53 (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
5.
BöhmMartina1999Samarien und die Samaritai bei Lukas: Eine Studie zum religionshistorischen und traditionsgeschichtlichen Hintergrund der lukanischen Samarientexte und zu deren topographischer Verhaftung (WUNT, 2/111; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
6.
BovonFrançois2013Luke 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9.51–19.27 (Hermeneia, 3; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
7.
BrodieThomas L.1981 ‘Luke the Literary Interpreter: Luke–Acts as a Systematic Rewriting and Updating of the Elijah–Elisha Narrative in 1 and 2 Kings’, PhD dissertation, University of St Thomas.
8.
BrodieThomas L.1989 ‘Luke 9.57-62: A Systematic Adaptation of the Divine Challenge to Elijah (1 Kings 19)’, in LullDavid J. (ed.), Society of Biblical Literature 1989 Seminar Papers (SBLSP, 28; Atlanta: Scholars Press): 237-45.
9.
BrodieThomas L.1990 ‘Luke–Acts as an Imitation and Emulation of the Elijah–Elisha Narrative’, in RichardEarl (ed.), New Views on Luke and Acts (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press): 78-85.
10.
BrodieThomas L.2014 ‘Luke’s Use of the Elijah-Elisha Narrative’, in KloppenborgJohn S.VerheydenJoseph (eds.), The Elijah–Elisha Narrative in the Composition of Luke (LNTS, 493; New York: T&T Clark): 6-29.
11.
CadburyHenry J.1958The Making of Luke–Acts (London: SPCK).
12.
CoganMordechai20001 Kings: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 10; New York: Doubleday).
13.
ConzelmannHans1960The Theology of St Luke (trans. BuswellGeoffrey; New York: Harper & Row).
14.
CreedJohn Martin1950The Gospel According to St Luke: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indices (London: MacMillan).
15.
CurkpatrickStephen2002 ‘“Real and Fictive” Widows: Nuances of Independence and Resistance in Luke’, LTQ37: 215-24.
16.
DankerFrederick W.1988Jesus and the New Age: A Commentary on St Luke’s Gospel (rev. edn; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
17.
DochhornJan2007 ‘Die Verschonung des samaritanischen Dorfes (Lk 9.54-55): Eine kritische Reflexion von Elia-Überlieferung im Lukasevangelium und eine frühjüdische Parallele im Testament Abrahams’, NTS53: 359-78.
18.
EllisE.E.2003The Gospel of Luke (rev. edn; Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock).
19.
EvansCraig A.1987 ‘Luke’s Use of the Elijah–Elisha Narratives and the Ethics of Election’, JBL106: 75-83.
20.
FitzmyerJoseph A.1978 ‘The Composition of Luke, Chapter 9’, in TalbertCharles H. (ed.), Perspectives on Luke–Acts (Perspectives on Religious Studies, Special Studies Series, 5; Danville, VA: Association of Baptist Professors of Religion): 139-52.
21.
FitzmyerJoseph A.1981The Gospel According to Luke (I-IX): Introduction, Translation, and Notes (AB, 28; New York: Doubleday).
22.
GreenJoel B.1997The Gospel of Luke (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
23.
HjelmIngrid2004 ‘What Do Samaritans and Jews Have in Common? Recent Trends in Samaritan Studies’, CBR3: 9-59.
24.
JervellJacob1972Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke–Acts (Minneapolis: Augsburg).
25.
KnoppersGary N.2013Jews and Samaritans: The Origins and History of their Early Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
26.
MargueratDaniel1999 ‘Luc-Actes: Une unité à construire’, in VerheydenJoseph (ed.), The Unity of Luke–Acts (BETL, 142; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 57-81.
27.
MarshallI. Howard1970Luke: Historian and Theologian (Contemporary Evangelical Perspectives; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).
28.
MarshallI. Howard1978The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary of the Greek Text (NIGTC 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
29.
MillerR.J.1988 ‘Elijah, John, and Jesus in the Gospel of Luke’, NTS34: 611-22.
NollandJohn1993a Luke 9.21–18.34 (WBC, 35B; Dallas, TX: Word).
32.
ÖhlerMarkus1997Elia im Neuen Testament: Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung des alttestamentlichen Propheten im frühen Christentum (BZNW, 88. Berlin: de Gruyter).
33.
PaoDavid W.SchnabelEckhard J.2007 ‘Luke’, in BealeG.K.CarsonD.A. (eds.), Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic): 251-415.
34.
ParsonsMikeal C.PervoRichard I.1993Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
35.
PlummerAlfred1913A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
36.
PummerReinhard2009The Samaritans in Flavius Josephus (TSAJ, 129; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
37.
PummerReinhard2016The Samaritans: A Profile (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
38.
RavensDavid1995Luke and the Restoration of Israel (JSNTSup, 119; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
39.
RoweC. Kavin2006Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
40.
RoweC. Kavin2007 ‘Literary Unity and Reception History: Reading Luke–Acts as Luke and Acts’, JSNT29.4: 449-57.
SheltonJohn2014 ‘The Healing of Naaman (2 Kgs 5.1-19) as a Central Component for the Healing of the Centurion’s Slave (Luke 7.1-10)’, in KloppenborgJohn S.VerheydenJoseph (eds.), The Elijah-Elisha Narrative in the Composition of Luke (LNTS, 493; New York: T&T Clark): 65-87.
VerheydenJoseph1999 ‘The Unity of Luke–Acts: What Are we up to?’, in VerheydenJoseph (ed.), The Unity of Luke–Acts (BETL, 142; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 3-56.
45.
WeissenriederAnnette2003Images of Illness in the Gospel of Luke: Insights of Ancient Medical Texts (WUNT, 2.164; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
46.
WinkWalter1968John the Baptist in the Gospel Tradition (SNTSMS, 7. London: Cambridge University Press).
