ArondekarA., 2009. For the Record: On Sexuality and the Colonial Archive in India. Duke University Press. Durham: Duke University Press.
2.
ArondekarA.CvetkovichA.HanhardtC.B.KunzelR.Nyong’oT.RodríguezJ.M.StrykerS.MarshallD.MurphyK.P.TortoriciZ.2015. Queering archives: a roundtable discussion. Radical History Review, 2015(122), pp. 211–231.
3.
AwachieI., 2020. Archiving the African feminist festival through oral communication and social media. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920911368.
4.
BelleL.V.KhanZ.SmithH.A.SinghJ.2020. Experimentations with the archive: a roundtable conversation. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920931878.
5.
BradleyR., 2014. Introduction: other sensualities. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 24(2–3), pp. 129–133.
6.
BrahA., 1996. Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London and New York: Routledge.
7.
Bruce-JonesE., 2020. Book review: Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920917910.
8.
BurinY.SowinskiE.A.2014. Sister to sister: developing a Black British feminist archival consciousness. Feminist Review, 108, pp. 112–119.
9.
CamptT.M.2017. Listening to Images. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
10.
CartwrightR.L.2020. Out of sorts: a queer crip in the archive. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920911936.
11.
ChandlerD.R.2018. Lifting the veil: digitizing Black archives at Tuskegee University. The Public Historian, 40(3), pp. 232–251.
12.
CiforM., 2016. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 7–31.
13.
CiforM.GillilandA.J.2016. Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 1–6.
14.
CiforM.WoodS.2017. Critical feminism in the archives. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(2), pp. 1–27.
15.
CrossK.PeckJ.2010. Editorial: special issue on Photography, Archive and Memory. photographies, 3(2), pp. 127–138.
16.
CvetkovichA., 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
17.
DeverM., 2017. Archives and new modes of feminist research. Australian Feminist Studies, 32(91–92), pp. 1–4.
18.
Digital Women’s Archive North, 2017. The feminists are cackling in the archive …. Feminist Review, 115, pp. 155–164.
19.
EichhornK., 2013. The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
EshunK., 2003. Further considerations on Afrofuturism. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(2), pp. 287–302.
21.
FrankC., 2019. Sister Outsider and Audre Lorde in The Netherlands: on transnational queer feminisms and archival methodological practices. Feminist Review, 121 pp. 9–23.
22.
FreemanE., 2010. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham: Duke University Press.
23.
GumbsA.P.2011. Seek the roots: an immersive and interactive archive of Black feminist practice. Feminist Collections: A Quarterly of Women’s Studies Resources, 32(1), pp. 17–21.
24.
GumbsA.P.2018. M Archive: After the End of the World. Durham: Duke University Press.
25.
HalberstamJ., 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.
26.
HamraieA., 2017. Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
HartmanS., 1997. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
HartmanS., 2007. Lose Your Mother: A Journey Along the Atlantic Slave Route. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
29.
HartmanS., 2019. Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
30.
HermittL., 2020. Photos on the mantelpiece. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920910387.
31.
IgweO., 2018. No Dance, No Palaver. Series of three films. Alchemy Film & Media Arts Festival, 3–8 May. Hawick.
32.
IgweO., 2020. Being close to, with or amongst. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920918152.
33.
JaganathanA.MalikS.GivanniJ.2020. June Givanni’s Pan-African Cinema Archive: a diasporic feminist dwelling space. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920913499.
34.
JohnstoneA.J.B.2020. Speculative fabulations: enter the archive, or ‘beneath Yaba’s Garden’. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920911357.
35.
JorgensenD.McLeanI.2017. Indigenous Archives: The Making and Unmaking of Aboriginal Art. Perth: UWA Publishing.
36.
KempadooR., 2016. Creole in the Archive: Imagery, Presence and the Location of the Caribbean Figure. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd.
37.
KumbierA., 2014. Ephemeral Material: Queering the Archive. Sacramento: Litwin Books.
38.
LeeJ.A.2016. Be/longing in the archival body: eros and the “Endearing” value of material lives. Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 33–51.
39.
LewisG., 2017. Questions of presence. Feminist Review, 117, pp. 1–19.
40.
ManalansanM.F.2014. The “stuff ” of archives: mess, migration, and queer lives. Radical History Review, 2014(120), pp. 94–107.
41.
Miller-YoungM., 2014. A Taste for Brown Sugar: Black Women in Pornography. Durham: London: Duke University Press Books.
42.
MirzaH.S.GunaratnamY.2014. ‘The branch on which I sit’: reflections on Black British feminism. Feminist Review, 108, pp. 125–133.
43.
Motamedi-FraserM., 2012. Once upon a Problem. The Sociological Review, 60(S1), pp. 84–107.
44.
MuñozJ.E.1996. Ephemera as evidence: introductory notes to queer acts. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 8(2), pp. 5–16.
45.
Nyong’oT., 2018. Afro-Fabulations: The Queer Drama of Black Life. New York: NYU Press.
46.
RichardsT., 1993. The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire. London and New York: Verso.
47.
RichardsonM., 2013. The Queer Limit of Black Memory: Black Lesbian Literature and Irresolution. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
SaidE., 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.
50.
SamerR., 2014. Revising ‘re-vision’: documenting 1970s feminisms and the queer potentiality of digital feminist archives. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 5. Available at: http://adanewmedia.org/2014/07/issue5-samer/ [last accessed 5 May 2020].
51.
SawyerL.Osei-KofiN.2020. ‘Listening’ with Gothenburg’s Iron Well: engaging the imperial archive through Black feminist methodologies and arts-based research. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920913551.
52.
SharpeC., 2016. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Durham: Duke University Press.
53.
ShepherdN., 2013. Ruin memory: a hauntology of Cape Town. In RuibalA.G. ed. Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 233–243.
54.
SinghJ., 2018. No Archive Will Restore You. Goleta: punctum books.
55.
SnortonC.R.2017. Black on Both Sides: A Racial History of Trans Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
56.
SteedmanC., 2001. Something she called a fever: Michelet, Derrida, and dust. The American Historical Review, 106(4), pp. 1159–1180.
57.
SteedmanC., 2011. After the archive. Comparative Critical Studies, 8(2–3), pp. 321–340.
58.
StolerA.L.2010 [2002]. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
59.
SwabyN.A.2014. ‘Disparate in voice, sympathetic in direction’: gendered political Blackness and the politics of solidarity. Feminist Review, 108, pp. 11–25.
60.
TaylorD., 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
61.
The Watermelon Woman, 1997. Directed by DunyeCherylUSA: Dancing Girl.
62.
ThomasV., 2020. Black tree play: learning from anti-lynching ecologies in The ‘Life and Times’ of an American Called Pauli Murray. Feminist Review, 125. DOI: 10.1177/0141778920918582.
63.
TitchkoskyT., 2011. The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
64.
WekkerG., 2016. White Innocence. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
65.
ZapperiG., 2013. Woman’s reappearance: rethinking the archive in contemporary art—feminist perspectives. Feminist Review, 105, pp. 21–47.