Four hundred and eighty-seven consecutive knee arthrograms, performed over a 6-year period, are reviewed. Their accuracy is compared with arthroscopy and, where appropriate, with arthrotomy. The increasing accuracy of arthrography has resulted in the acceptance of this method of imaging as a useful and accurate means of examining meniscal injuries in the knee. This has led to far fewer surgical procedures and an overall saving of resources.
GoodfellowJ.W.Editorial: he who hesitates is saved. J Bone Joint Surg1980; 62-B: 1–2
3.
NobleK., EratK.In defence of the meniscus: a prospective study of 200 meniscectomy patients. J Bone Joint Surg, 1980; 62-B: 7–11
4.
StokerD.J., RentonP., FultonA.The value of arthrography in the management of internal derangements of the knee. The first 1000. Clin Rad1981; 32: 557–66
5.
GallimoreGWJr., HarnessS.E.Knee injuries: high resolution MR imaging. Radiology1986; 160: 450–1
6.
ReicherM.A., HartzmanS., BassettL.W., MandelbaumB., DuckwilerG.R., GoldE.M.MR imaging of the knee, traumatic disorders. Radiology1987; 162: 547–51
