Morphological differences among mandibles of grass and leaf-cutting ant species were examined. Specifically, we compared morphometric measurements from mandibles of four species (Atta laevigata, A. bisphaerica, Acromyrmex balzani, and Ac. subterraneus). It was found that these Atta species had similar mandible morphologies, primarily differing in distal tooth length. In contrast, the two Acromyrmex exhibited considerable variation in morphology: Ac. balzani mandibles are more robust and massive, while Ac. subterraneus mandibles are elongated. These results support that morphological differences in mandible shape and dentition are related to preference for either grasses or eudicot leaves.
BrandãoC. R. F.; Mayhé-NunesA. J.; SanhudoC. E. D.2011. Taxonomia e filogenia das formigas cortadeiras. pp. 27–48. In: Della-LúciaT. M. C. (Ed.). Formigas cortadeiras: da bioecologia no manejo. Editora UFV. Viçosa. Brazil. 421 p.
2.
BrownW. L.; WilsonE. O.1959. The evolution of the dacetine ants. The Quarterly Review of Biology34: 278–294.
3.
CamargoR. S.; FortiL. C.; LopesJ. F.; AndradeA. P. P.; OttatiA. L. T.2007. Age polyethism in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus brummeus Forel, 1911 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Applied Entomology131 (2): 139–145. doi: 10.11115.1439-0418.2006.01129.x
4.
ChapmanR. F.1964. The structure and wear of the mandibles in some African grasshoppers. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London142: 107–121.
5.
DejeanA.; SuzzoniJ. P.; SchatzB.; OrivelJ.2002. Territorial aggressiveness and predation: two possible origins of snapping in the ant Plectroctena minor. Comptes Rendus Biologies325: 819–825.
6.
Della-LuciaT. M. C.2011. Formigas cortadeiras: da bioecologia ao manejo. Editora UFV. Viçosa. Brazil. 421 p.
7.
EhmerB.; HölldoblerB.1995. Foraging behavior of Odontomachus hauwi on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Psyche102: 215–224.
8.
FlechtmannC. H. W.1975. Elementos de Acarologia. Biblioteca Rural/ Livraria Nobel S/A. São Paulo. Brazil. 344 p.
9.
FortiL. C.; CamargoR. S.; MatosC. A. O.; AndradeA. P. P.; LopesJ. F.2004. Aloctismo em Acromyrmex subterraneus bramneus Forel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), durante o forrageamento, cultivo do jardim de fungo e devolução dos materiais forrageados. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia48 (1): 59–63.
10.
FowlerH. G.; SilvaV. P.; SaesN. B.1986. Population dynamics of leaf-cutting ants: a brief review. pp. 123–145. In: LofgrenC. S.; Vander MeerR. K. (Eds.). Fire ants and leaf-cutting ants: Biology and management. West-View Press. Boulder. Colorado. USA. 435 p.
11.
HastenreiterI. N.; SalesT. A.; CamargoR. S.; FortiL. C.; LopesJ. F. S.2015. Use of seeds as fungus garden substrate changes the organization of labor among leaf-cutting ant workers. Neotropical Entomology44: 351–356. doi: 10.1007/s13744-015-0299-0
12.
HernandezJ. V.; CabreraA.; JaffeK.1999. Mandibular gland secretion in different castes of the leaf-cutter ant Atta laevigata. Journal of Chemical Ecology25 (11): 2433–2444.
13.
HölldoblerB.; WilsonE. O.1990. The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge. USA. 732 p.
14.
HughesW. O. H.; HowseP. E.; GoulsonD.2001. Mandibular gland chemistry of grass-cutting ants: species, caste, and colony variation. Journal of Chemical Ecology27 (1): 109–124.
15.
IchinoseK.; FortiL. C.; PrettoD. R.; JacobusG. N.; BoomsmaJ.2007. Sex allocation in the polydomous leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex halzani. Ecological Research22: 288–295. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0063-3
16.
LopesJ. F.; CamargoR. S.; FortiL. C.2003. Foraging behavior and subtask hierarchical structure in Acromyrmex spp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology42 (3): 781–793.
17.
LopesJ. F.; FortiL. C.; CamargoR. S.2004. The influence of the scout upon the decision making process of recruited workct in three Acromyrmex species (Formicidae: Attini). Behavioral Process67 (3): 471–476. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.08.001
18.
LutzF. E.1929. Observations on leaf-cutting ants. American Museum Novitates388: 1–21.
19.
MasseyF. P.; EnnosA. R.; HartleyS. E.2006. Silica in grasses as a defence against insect herbivores: contrasting effects on folivores and phloem feeder. Journal of Animal Ecology75: 595–603.
20.
MausethJ. D.1988. Plant Anatomy. Benjamin Cummings Publishing. California. USA. 560 p.
21.
McCuneB.; MeffordM. J.2011. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 6. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach. Oregon, U.S.A.
22.
MoffettM. W.1985. Trap-jaw predation and other observations on two species of Myrmoteras (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux33: 85–99.
23.
PattersonB. D.1984. Correlation between mandibular morphology and specific diet of some desert grassland Acrididae (Orthoptera). American Midland Naturalist111 (2): 296–303.
24.
PaulJ.2001. Mandible movements in ants. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology131A: 7–20.
25.
SchofieldR. M.; NessonM. H.; RichardsonK. A.2002. Tooth hardness increases with zinc-content in the mandibles of young adult leaf-cutter ants. Naturwissenschaften89 (12): 579–83.
26.
SchofieldR. M. S.; EmmettK. D.; NiedbalaJ. C.; NessonM. H.2011. Leaf-cutter ants with worn mandibles cut half as fast, spend twice the energy, and tend to carry instead of cut. Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology65 (5): 969–982. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1098-6
27.
SpagnaJ. C.; SchelkopfA.; CarrilloT.; SuarezV.2009. Evidence of behavioral cooption from context-dependent variation in mandibles use in trap-jaw ants (Odontomachus spp.). Naturwissenschaften96: 243–350.
28.
TautzJ.; RocesF.; HölldoblerB.1995. Use of sound-based vibratome by leaf-cutting ants. Science267 (5194): 84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5194.84
29.
VicariM.; BazelyD. R.1993. Do grasses fight back the case for antiherbivore defenses. Trends in Ecology and Evolution8: 137–141.
