Transnationalism was initially proposed as an alternative perspective to the assimilation and integration frameworks, which tend to prioritize the nation-state over transnational mobility. Policy-makers in host societies usually regard transnational migrants’ close linkages with the homeland as a sign of social and political detachment, thus reducing their contributions to the host land. Findings from our research on Chinese new immigrant entrepreneurs in Singapore suggest the simultaneous embeddedness of immigrants into two or more nation-states and geopolitical spheres. However, integration in Singapore and transnational ties with China are not necessarily a zero-sum game. Our evidence suggests that transnationalism and integration have been construed as a mutually reinforcing strategy in new immigrants’ efforts to accumulate economic and social resources in both the host land and the homeland. The formations, characteristics and mechanisms of the dual embeddedness process of new Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs in Singapore are detailed in the article.
BaschLGlickSNBlancCS (1994) Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States, Langhorne: Gordon and Breach.
2.
BinaisaN (2013) Ugandans in Britain making ‘new’ homes: Transnationalism, place and identity within narratives of integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 885–902.
3.
CarlingJHoelscherK (2013) Capacity and desire to remit: Comparing local and transnational influences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 939–958.
4.
ChanKBNgBK (2001) Singapore. In: GomezETHsiaoHH (eds) Chinese Business in Southeast Asia: Contesting Cultural Explanations, Researching Entrepreneurship, Surrey: Curzon Press, pp. 38–61.
ErdalMB (2013) Migrant transnationalism and multi-layered integration: Norwegian-Pakistani migrants’ own reflections. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 983–998.
7.
ErdalMBOeppenC (2013) Migrant balancing acts: Understanding the interactions between integration and transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 867–881.
8.
GomesC (2014) Xenophobia online: Unmasking Singaporean attitudes towards ‘foreign talent’ migrants. Asian Ethnicity15(1): 21–40.
9.
Gomez ET and Hsiao HH (eds) (2004) Chinese Enterprise, Transnationalism, and Identity. London: Routledge Curzon.
10.
GranovetterM (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
11.
GreveASalaffJ (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice28: 1–22.
12.
GrilloRDMazzucatoV (2008) Africa < > Europe: A double engagement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(2): 175–198.
13.
HagelundA (2010) Dealing with dilemmas: Integration at the street-level in Norway. International Migration48(2): 79–102.
14.
HammondL (2013) Somali transnational activism and integration in the UK: Mutually supporting strategies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 1001–1017.
15.
ItzigsohnJGiorguli-SaucedoS (2002) Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural trans-nationalism. International Migration Review36(3): 766–798.
16.
ItzigsohnJGiorguli-SaucedoS (2005) Incorporation, transnationalism and gender: Immigrant incorporation and transnational participation as gendered processes. International Migration Review39(4): 895–920.
17.
JayaweeraHChoudhuryT (2008) Immigration, Faith and Cohesion: Evidence from Local Areas with Significant Muslim Populations, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
18.
KivistoP (2001) Theorizing transnational immigration: A critical review of current efforts. Ethnic and Racial Studies24(4): 549–577.
19.
KuahKE (2000) Rebuilding the Ancestral Village: Singaporeans in China, Aldershot: Ashgate.
20.
LacroixT (2013) Collective remittances and integration: North African and North Indian comparative perspectives. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 1019–1035.
21.
LevittP (2003) Keeping feet in both worlds: Transnational practices and immigrant incorporation in the United States. In: JoppkeCMorawskaE (eds) Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 177–194.
22.
LevittPJaworskyN (2007) Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology33: 129–156.
23.
LeyD (2006) Explaining variations in business performance among immigrant entrepreneurs in Canada. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(5): 743–764.
24.
LeyD (2013) Does transnationalism trump immigrant integration? Evidence from Canada’s links with east Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(6): 921–938.
25.
LiPS (2000) Overseas Chinese networks: A reassessment. In: ChanKB (ed) Chinese Business Networks: State, Economy and Culture, Singapore: Prentice Hall, pp. 261–284.
26.
Lianhe Zaobao (2013) 140 jia Zhongguo Gongsi Bendi Shangshi, Zongshizhi Da 320 Yi Xinyuan (140 Chinese companies listed in Singapore’s stock exchange market with a total market capitalization reaching SGD32 billion). 12 November. Available at: http://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/singapore/story20131112-275615 [in Chinese].
27.
LiuH (2012) Beyond a revisionist turn: Network, state, and the changing dynamics of diasporic Chinese entrepreneurship. China: An International Journal10(3): 20–41.
28.
LiuH (2014) Beyond co-ethnicity: The politics of differentiating and integrating new immigrants in Singapore. Ethnic and Racial Studies37(7): 1225–1238.
29.
MargerMN (2001) The use of social and human capital among Canadian business immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies27: 439–453.
30.
MazzucatoV (2008) The double engagement: Transnationalism and integration: Ghanaian migrants’ lives between Ghana and the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(2): 199–216.
31.
Menkhoff T and Gerke S (eds) (2002) Chinese Entrepreneurship and Asian Business Networks. London: Routledge Curzon.
32.
MorawskaE (2003) Immigrant transnationalism and assimilation: A variety of combinations and a theoretical model they suggest. In: JoppkeCMorawskaE (eds) Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, New York: Palgrave, pp. 133–176.
33.
MorawskaE (2004) Exploring diversity in assimilation and transnationalism: Poles and Russian Jews in Philadelphia. International Migration Review38(4): 1372–1412.
NeeVSandersJMSernauS (1994) Job transitions in an immigrant metropolis: Ethnic boundaries and the mixed economy. American Sociological Review59(6): 849–872.
36.
OeppenC (2013) A stranger at ‘home’: Interactions between transnational return visits and integration for Afghan-American professionals. Global Networks13(2): 261–278.
37.
Ong AH and Nonini DM (eds) (1997) Ungrounded Empires, The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism. New York: Routledge.
38.
OoiY (2008) Becoming transnational through assimilation: Emergence of national/ethnic identity among Chinese migrants in late nineteenth-century Chicago. International Journal of Japanese Sociology17: 77–90.
39.
PortesA (1999) The origins and effects of transnational activities. Ethnic and Racial Studies22(2): 463–475.
40.
PortesA (2001) Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks1(3): 181–193.
41.
PortesAGuarnizoLEHallerWJ (2002) Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review67(2): 278–298.
42.
PortesAGuarnizoLELandoltP (1999) The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies22(2): 217–237.
43.
RusinovicK (2008) Transnational embeddedness: Transnational activities and networks among first- and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(3): 431–451.
44.
SaxenianALMotoyamaYQuanXH (2002) Local and Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals in Silicon Valley, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
45.
SchansD (2009) Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(7): 1164–1182.
Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations (2010) Jinjiang Huiguan Xinzhiwei Jiuzhi Sifenzhiyi wei Xinyimin (One-fourth of the new executive committee members of Singapore Jinjiang Association are new Chinese immigrants). SFCCA Newsletter 57: 9 [in Chinese].
48.
SnelEEngbersenGLeerkesA (2006) Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks6(3): 285–308.
49.
TamakiE (2011) Transnational home engagement among Latino and Asian Americans: Resources and motivation. International Migration Review45(1): 48–73.
50.
Tan CB (ed.) (2007) Chinese Transnational Networks. London: Routledge.
51.
TsudaT (2012) Whatever happened to simultaneity? Transnational migration theory and dual engagement in sending and receiving countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(4): 631–649.
WaldingerR (2008) Between ‘‘here’’ and ‘‘there’’: Immigrant cross-border activities and loyalties. International Migration Review42(1): 3–29.
54.
WaldingerRFitzgeraldD (2004) Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology109(5): 1177–1195.
55.
WangGW (2001) Don’t Leave Home: Migration and the Chinese, Singapore: Times Academic Press.
56.
Wang HY (ed.) (2014) Annual Report on Chinese International Migration. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
57.
Wong R (ed.) (2008) Chinese Entrepreneurship in a Global Era. London: Routledge.
58.
WuBLiuH (2014) Bringing class back in: Class consciousness and solidarity among Chinese migrant workers in Italy and the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies37(8): 1391–1408.
59.
YangM (1994) Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China, New York: Cornell University Press.
60.
YeohBSALinWQ (2013) Chinese migration to Singapore: Discourses and discontents in a globalizing nation-state. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal22(1): 31–54.
61.
Yeung HWC and Olds K (eds) (2000) Globalization of Chinese Business Firm. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.
62.
YimCC (2011) Transnational social spaces and transnationalism: A study on the new Chinese migrant community in Singapore, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
63.
ZhouM (2004) Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: Convergences, controversies, and conceptual advancements. International Migration Review38(3): 1040–1074.
64.
Zhou M and Liu H (2012) Changing patterns of Chinese immigration and diaspora-homeland interactions in Singapore and the United States. Program on International Migration, UCLA. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7051501n.
65.
ZukinSDiMaggioP (1990) Introduction. In: ZukinSDiMaggioP (eds) Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.
