To carry through a training program for nurses in preparation an Individual plan (IP) for cancer patients and then explore what experiences the nurses acquires after going through this program.
Background:
Among the nurses there was a wide opinion about that cancer patients exceptionally received one drowned up IP; one legalized right from the year 2001. One idea upraises to working through one training program in IP for nurses.
Method:
These study use a qualitative design based up on teaching program in IP and focus group interview to explore which experiences the nurses acquires after going through the training program.
Findings:
The analyses show that IP not at all are integrated in the everyday's practical work and the responsibility for IP is pulverized. As this is a working task taking time, the nurses are dependent on that colleagues have knowledge about IP and accept that this task taking time.
Conclusion:
Results shows that training program in IP has a value and that training is necessary to implement IP. The right to IP must be anchor in the management.
Kreftregisteret (2009). Cancer in Norway 2008 (2009). Cancer Registry of Norway Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo.
2.
Stortingsmelding nr. 16 (2011) Nasjonal helse- og omsorgsplan (2011–2015). Helse og omsorgsdepartementet, Oslo.
3.
Individuell plan (2007). Veiledar til forskrift om individuell plan; Sosial- og helsedirektoratet, Oslo.
4.
GrønnestadBKBlystadA. Pasienters opplevelse av informasjon i forbindelse med operasjon.-En kvalitativ studie. Vård I Norden. 2004; 24: 4–8.
5.
SægrovSHaldingAG. «What is it Like Living with the diagnosis of Cancer». European Journal of Cancer Care. 2004; 13, 145–154.
6.
ReaddySBrueraEPaceEZhangKReyes-GibbyCC. Clinically important Improvement in the intensity of fatigue in patients with advsnced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2007; 10(5): 1068–75.
Forskrift om individuelle planer (2001). Fastsatt av Sosial- og helsedepartementet 28. juni 2001 med hjemmel i lov 19. november 1982 nr. 66 om helsetjenesten i kommunene §§ 1 – 3, 1 – 4, og lov 2.juli 1999. nr. 61 om spesialisthelsetjensten m. m. § 2 – 1.
9.
Stortingsmelding nr. 47 (2009) Samhandlingsreformen. Rett behandling — på rett sted — til rett tid. Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, Oslo.
10.
KåresenRLangmarkF. «Psychososial and Economic Status of Norwegian Women Operated for Breast or Gynaecologic cancer.»The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association. 2000; 23; 120: 2741–48.
11.
SægrovSLorensenM. «Cancer Patients' Opinions concerning post — Treatment Follow-up. European journal of Cancer Care. 2005; 15, 56–64.
12.
ErautM. Ekspert and expertise: Meanings and perspectives. Learning in Health & Social Care. 2005; 4(4), 173–179.
WinterlingJSidenvallBGlimeliusBNordinK. Expectations for the recovery period after cancer treatment- a qualitative study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2009; 18, 585–593.
15.
PattisonN.A.DolandSTownsendPTownsendR. After critical care: A study to explore Patients' experiences of a follow-up service. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007; 16, 2122–2131.
16.
WilsonKPatemanBBeaverKLukerK.A.. Patient and carer needs following a cancer-related hospital admission: The importance of referral to the district nursing service. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002; 38(3), 245–253
17.
VivarC. G.McQueenA. Informational and emotional needs of long-term survivors of breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 51 (5), 520–528.
18.
McKenzieHBoughtonMHayesLForsythSDaviesMUnderwoodEMcVeyP. A sense of security for cancer patients at home: The role of community nurses. University of Sydney, Journal compilation. 2007; 15(4), 352–359.
19.
KvåleKBondevikM. Patients' Perceptions of the Importance of Nurses' Knowledge About Cancer and Its Treatment for Quality Nursing Care. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2010; Vol. 37, No. 4, July 2010.
20.
KvåleKBondevikM. What is important for patient centred care? A qualitative study about the perceptions of patients with cancer. Scandinavic Journal of Caring Science. 2008; 22, 582–58
21.
VifladtE. H. & HopenL. Helsepedagogikk — samhandling om læring og meistring. 2004;Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for læring og mestring ved kronisk sykdom, Oslo.
22.
KlevR & LevinM. Forandring som praksis. Endringsledelse gjennom læring ogutvikling. 2009; Fagbokforlaget, Bergen.
23.
BennerP & SutphenM. Learning Across the Professions: The Clergy, a Case in Point. Journal of Nursing Education. 2007; 46(3), 103–108.
24.
HagerP & SmithE. The Inescapability of Significant Contextual Learning in Work Performance. London Review of Education. 2004; 2(1), 33–46.
25.
HagerP & HodkinsonP. Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learnig. British Educational Research Journal. 2009; 35(4), 619–638.
26.
DaleyB. J.. Context: Implications for Learning in Professional Practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education. 2002; (96), 79.
27.
ErautM. Learning context. Learning in Health & Social Care. 2006; 5(1), 1–8.
28.
KruegerA & CaseyM. Focus groups-3rd Edition- A pratical guide for applied Research. 2000; Thousand Oaks-London-New delhi: Sage Publication;Inc.
29.
MalterudK. Fokusgrupper som forskningsmetode for medisin og helsefag. 2012; Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
