The recent academic purge in Turkey eventuated by a twin wave starting in January 2016 was unprecedented. Two years of statutory rule after the July 2016 failed coup further damaged the rule of law. Even the legal authorities did not respect fundamental human rights. Psychology faculty had to keep a low profile to avoid further encroachments.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which psychology faculty discerned research and teaching-bound sociopolitical risks and exercised mitigation strategies.
Method
Sixty-three faculty responded to a questionnaire assessing risk appraisals and mitigation appeals countering threats to their research and teaching.
Results
Faculty remained inactive against high-risk appraisal in research and appealed to avoidance or vagueness when their risk appraisals were moderate. By contrast, avoidance was the primary strategy, compared to vagueness or inaction, in risk-bearing teaching.
Conclusion
Faculty try to cope with the adverse negative intellectual climate by being highly selective in their research and teaching. They appeal to differential strategies in either domain.
Teaching Implications
Research in risk apprehension and mitigation along with studies highlighting shared experiences may inform psychology departments on how to proceed under antagonistic circumstances.
AltinyelkenH. K.ÇayırK.AgirdagO. (2015). Turkey at a crossroads: Critical debates and issues in education. Comparative Education, 51(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1089076
4.
ArıkE.YıldızT. (2014, April 25). Türkiye yükseköğretiminde büyüme sorunu: Psikoloji bölümleri örneği. 1. Avrasya Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, Istanbul.
BayramA. (2018). The reflection of neoliberal economic policies on education: Privatization of education in Turkey. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.341
DeğirmencioğluS. (2008). Kamusaldan özele dönüşen olanaklar ışığında üniversitede demokrasi. In S. Akyol, M. K. Coşkun, Z. Yılmaz, M. B. Aydın, & R. Altunpolat, Eds.), Dönüştürülen üniversiteler ve eğitim sistemimiz (pp. 35–60). Eğitim-Sen.
13.
de JongV. M. T.EijkemansM. J. C.van CalsterB.TimmermanD.MoonsK. G. M.SteyerbergE. W.van SmedenM. (2019). Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models. Statistics in Medicine, 38(9), 1601–1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8063
14.
DemirbilekM.ÇetinM. (2022). Academic promotion and appointment process in higher education since the proclamation of the Turkish Republic. Yuksekogretim Dergisi, 12(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.810002
15.
DogramacıI. (1984). Higher education reform in Turkey—the university in the service of the community: Results after three years of application. Higher Education in Europe, 9(4), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772840090413
16.
DönmezP. E.DumanA. (2021). Marketisation of academia and authoritarian governments: The cases of Hungary and Turkey in critical perspective. Critical Sociology, 47(7–8), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520976780
DundarH.LewisD. R. (1999). Equity, quality and efficiency effects of reform in turkish higher education. Higher Education Policy, 12, 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00016-1
19.
FındıklıB. (2022). A republic of scholars or scholars of the republic? Reflections on the predicaments of academic freedom and university autonomy in Turkey. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(3), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12287
20.
FıratA.Akkuzuİ (2015). The commodification process of higher education and the changing nature of academic labour in Turkey. Critique, 43(3–4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2015.1099849
21.
GürB. S. (2016). Democratization and massification of higher education in Turkey and challenges ahead. In Research & Occasional Paper Series: 3.16. Center for Studies in Higher Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580831
22.
GuvenI. (2019). Neo-conservative Islam and transition of secular education in Turkey. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 18(53), 37–59. https://doi.org/http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/1075
23.
HünlerO. S. (2021). “Dangerous questions: Why academic freedom matters”—A massive open online course to promote academic freedom and the values of higher education. In P. E. V. V. Frangville, A. Merlin, J. Sfeir, (Eds.), La liberté académique: Enjeux et menaces (pp. 65–74). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
24.
HünlerO. S.NamerY.DüzenN. E. (2023). The end of academia as we know it: Collective memory building against trauma policy. Journal of Education Science Society, 21(81), 56–75.
KarakayaM. S. (2018). 5651 Sayılı Kanun’un 9. Maddesi ve erişimin engellenmesi: Koyun postunda kurt hükmü. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 137, 97–132. https://doi.org/http://tbbdergisi.barobirlik.org.tr/m2018-137-1784
27.
KayaogluA.BaturS.AslitürkE. (2014). The unknown Muzafer Sherif. The Psychologist, 27(11), 830–833.
28.
KondakciY.OrucuD. (2017). Chapter 13—tertiary schooling patterns and disadvantaged groups in Turkey. In M. Shah & G. Whiteford (Eds.), Bridges, pathways and transitions (pp. 209–226). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101921-4.00013-0.
LindquistC. (2017). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145608
32.
MargaritidisC. (2021). Another one bites the dust: The prospect of academic freedom in illiberal democracies and the case of Hungary. In P. E. V. V. Frangville, A. Merlin, & J. Sfeir, (Eds.), La liberté académique: Enjeux et menaces (pp. 189–200). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
33.
Martin-SardesaiA.IrvineH.TooleyS.GuthrieJ. (2017). Government research evaluations and academic freedom: A UK and Australian comparison. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208156
34.
NamerY.HünlerO. S.DüzenN. E.UysalM. S.DumanE.HasateşC. (2018, July 2). Students’ accounts of academic displacement. 15th IMISCOE Annual Conference, Barcelona.
35.
ÖktemK.AkkoyunluK. (2016). Exit from democracy: Illiberal governance in Turkey and beyond. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1253231
36.
ÖzatalayC. (2020). Purge, exile, and resistance: Rethinking the conflict of the faculties through the case of academics for peace in Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, 30, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.6746
37.
ÖzdemirS. S. (2021). Civic death as a mechanism of retributive punishment: Academic purges in Turkey. Punishment & Society, 23(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520941744
38.
ÖzoǧluM.GürB. S.GümüsS. (2016). Rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: The challenges of recently established public universities (2006–2013). Higher Education Policy, 29(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.7
39.
PeduzziP.ConcatoJ.KemperE.HolfordT. R.FeinsteinA. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
40.
PolatS. (2017). The expansion of higher education in Turkey: Access, equality and regional returns to education. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.06.001
41.
PrelecT.FurstenbergS.HeathershawJ.ThomsonC. (2022). Is academic freedom at risk from internationalisation? Results from a 2020 survey of UK social scientists. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(10), 1698–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.2021398
42.
ReichmanH.MannM. E.ScottJ. W.XiX.LevyA. (2018). National security, the assault on science, and academic freedom. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (2010-), 104, 25–37. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/26891793
43.
Resmi Gazete (2016). Olağanüstü Hal Kapsamında Alınan Tedbirlere İlişkin Kanun Hükmünde Kararname. Resmi Gazete.
44.
SenA.StarkeyH. (2019). Citizenship education in Turkey: From militant-secular to Islamic nationalism. Rowman & Littlefield.
45.
SözeriC. (2019). The transformation of Turkey’s Islamic media and its marriage with neo-liberalism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1579413
46.
SpannagelJ.KinzelbachK. (2022). The academic freedom Index and its indicators: Introduction to new global time-series V-dem data. Quality & Quantity, 57(5), 3969–3989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01544-0
Turkish Psychological Association. (2014, February 22). Çalıştay Raporu. Istanbul : Türk Psikologlar Derneği Psikoloji Lisans ve Lisansüstü Eğitimi Çalıştayı.
53.
UysalM. S.AcarY. G.SabucedoJ.-M.CakalH. (2022). To participate or not participate, that’s the question’: The role of moral obligation and different risk perceptions on collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.7207
54.
VatanseverA. (2018). Partners in crime: The anti-intellectual complicity between the state and the universities in Turkey. The Journal of Interrupted Studies, 1(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/25430149-00101004
