The Promise of Labor-Based Grading Contracts for the Teaching of Psychology and Neuroscience

Abstract

Introduction: Instructors assign grades to communicate to students how well they are learning the course content. However, students and instructors are often displeased with the process and outcome of grading. Statement of the Problem: We contend that conventional grading inadvertently detracts from student learning and simultaneously replicates systems of oppression in academia. We discuss Labor-Based Grading Contracts (LBGCs) as an alternative to conventional grading. Literature Review: We review the conceptual and empirical literature on LBGCs as an alternative method of assessing student work and extend its application to psychology and neuroscience courses. Teaching Implications: We present recommendations for implementing LBGCs and address common concerns instructors have about this approach. We also make a call for more research on LBGCs in psychology and neuroscience teaching and learning. Conclusion: LBGCs represent a promising shift in the purpose and approach to assessing student work and learning by centering laboring to learn and developing skills. LBGCs also create a more equitable grading structure for all students.

Keywords

labor-based grading contracts grading assessment equity pedagogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College Health Association. (2021). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment III: Reference Group Executive Summary Fall 2021 . https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA-III_FALL_2021_UNDERGRADUATE_REFERENCE_GROUP_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.pdf

Assari

. (2019). Parental educational attainment and academic performance of American college students; Blacks’ diminished returns. Journal of Health Economics and Development, 1(1), 21–31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31372601/

Bean

J. C

. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Hawkley

L. C

. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005

Chin

M. J.

Quinn

D. M.

Dhaliwal

T. K.

Lovison

V. S

. (2020). Bias in the air: A nationwide exploration of teachers’ implicit racial attitudes, aggregate bias, and student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20937240

Cranney

., & Dunn

D. S

. (2011b). Psychological literacy and the psychologically literate citizen: New frontiers for a global discipline. In J. Cranney & D. S. Dunn (Eds.), The psychologically literate citizen: Foundations and global perspectives (pp. 3–12). Oxford University Press.

DeLozier

S. J.

Rhodes

M. G

. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9

DiAngelo

R. J

. (2010). Why can’t we all just be individuals?: Countering the discourse of individualism in anti-racist education. Interactions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/D461000670

Dompnier

Darnon

Butera

. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20(8), 939–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02384.x

10.

Dumas

M. J

. (2016). Against the dark: Antiblackness in education policy and discourse. Theory into Practice, 55(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1116852

11.

Eddy

S. L.

Hogan

K. A

. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

12.

Freeman

., Eddy

S. L

., McDonough

., Smith

M. K

., Okoroafor

., Jordt

., & Wenderoth

M. P

. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

13.

Freire

. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.

14.

Gurung

R. A. R

., & McCann

L. I

. (2012). How should students study? In B. M. Schwartz & R. A. R. Gurung (Eds.), Evidence-based teaching for higher education (pp. 99–116). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13745-006

15.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Durik

A. M.

Barron

K. E.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

Tauer

J. M

. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105

16.

hooks

. (2014). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700280

17.

Hughes

Bertram

S. M.

Young

A. M.

Merry

J. W.

Kolluru

G. R.

Dunlap

A. S.

Danielson-Francois

Weiss

. (2020). Teaching animal behavior online: A primer for the pandemic and beyond. Ethology, 127(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13096

18.

Hulme, J. A., & Cranney, J. (2021). Psychological literacy and learning for life. In International handbook of psychology learning and teaching (pp. 1-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

19.

Inoue

A. B

. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. Parlor Press.

20.

Inoue

A. B

. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.

21.

Kapur

. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195

22.

Karpicke

J. D.

Roediger

H. L

. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966–968. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1152408 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408

23.

Kryger

Zimmerman

G. X

. (2020). Neurodivergence and intersectionality in labor-based grading contracts. The Journal of Writing Assessment, 13(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0934 × 4rm

24.

Landrum

R. E.

Gurung

R. A

. (2013). The memorability of introductory psychology revisited. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487417

25.

Lipnevich

A. A.

Guskey

T. R.

Murano

D. M.

Smith

J. K

. (2020) What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1799190

26.

Mena

J. A

., Flack

W. F

., & Coleman

. (in press). Cultivating cooperation and community in the psychology classroom. Manuscript in press. In M. Fortner & I. Katzarska-Miller (Eds.). Empowering students as change agents in psychology courses. Society of Teaching of Psychology.

27.

Mena

J. A.

Stevenson

J. R

. (2021, December 21). Labor-based grading contracts sample materials. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/6fdmj/

28.

Pulfrey

Buchs

Butera

. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023911

29.

Sparkman

L. A.

Maulding

W. S.

Roberts

J. G

. (2012). Non-cognitive predictors of student success in college. College Student Journal, 46(3), 642–652.

30.

Stiles

B. L.

Wong

N. C. W.

LaBeff

E. E

. (2018). College cheating thirty years later: The role of academic entitlement. Deviant Behavior, 39(7), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1335520

31.

Surr

Zeiser

K. L.

Briggs

Kendziora

. (2018). Learning with others: A study exploring the relationship between collaboration, personalization, and equity. American Institutes for Research, 1–54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592089

32.

Theobald

E. J

., Hill

M. J

., Tran

., Agrawal

., Arroyo

E. N

., Behling

., Chambwe

., Cintron

D. L.

Cooper

J. D

., Dunster

., Grummer

J. A

., Hennessey

., Hsiao

., Iranon

., Jones

., Jordt

., Keller

., Lacey

M. E

., Littlefield

C. E

., … Freeman

. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

33.

Ward

. (2021a). Easing stress: Contract grading’s impact on adolescents’ perceptions of workload demands, time constraints, and challenge appraisal in high school English. Assessing Writing, 48, 100526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100526

34.

Ward

. (2021b). An integrated mixed-methods study of contract grading’s impact on adolescents’ perceptions of stress in high school English: A pilot study. Assessing Writing, 48, 100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100508

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB