The teaching and learning and autobiographical memory literatures both suggest that personal stories can serve a teaching and learning function.
Objective
Study 1 explored students’ perceptions about whether an instructor’s personal stories to enhance learning were mediated by how much the stories were liked and created a positive learning environment. Study 2 explored whether the learner’s cognitive processing style moderated the teaching and learning function of personal stories.
Method
Study 1 was correlational and conducted as an end-of-quarter course survey. Study 2 manipulated whether a pre-recorded lecture included or not an instructor’s personal stories.
Results
Students perceived that the instructor’s personal stories helped them to learn course material better via a more positive learning environment (Study 1). This teaching and learning function was not found in the experiment but cognitive style was a moderator (Study 2)
Conclusion
Due to the mixed results, the boundaries for when instructor’s personal stories will and will not serve a teaching and learning function needs further exploration.
Teaching Implications
Instructors should share personal stories with students because students like them and it enhances the classroom environment. However, the efficacy of stories for learning needs further exploration and may depend on the learner.
AckermanP. L (1986). Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice. Intelligence, 10(2), 101–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(86)90010-3
2.
AleaN.BluckS. (2003). Why are you telling me that? A conceptual model of the social function of autobiographical memory. Memory, 11(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/7419382077
3.
AleaN.BluckS. (2007). I’ll keep you in mind: The intimacy function of autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(8), 1091–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.13166
4.
AleaN.BluckS.MrozE. L.EdwardsZ. (2018). The social function of autobiographical stories in the personal and virtual world: An initial investigation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(17), 749–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12370
5.
AleaN.JawvitzS.YangP.AdamsP. (under review). The use and functions of students' personal stories in online discussion forums.
6.
AleaN.OsfeldM. J. (2020). Using stories to teach: Relations to student learning and engagement. [Presentation]. The Engaging Teaching Symposium. https://spark.adobe.com/page/Hf6N133lGznUl/
7.
AllinsonC. W. (1996). The cognitive style index: a measure of intuition analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x
8.
AllinsonC. A.HayesJ. (2012). The cognitive style index: Technical manual and user guide.
9.
BaddeleyA. (1988). But what the hell is it for?. In GrunebergM. M.MorrisP. E.SykesR. N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 3–18). Wiley
10.
BeikeD. R.BrandonN. R.ColeH. E. (2016). Is sharing specific autobiographical memories a distinct form of self-disclosure?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000143
11.
BluckS.AleaN. (2002). Exploring the functions of autobiographical memory: Why do I remember the autumn? In WebsterJ. D.HaightB. K. (Eds.), Critical Advances in Reminiscence Work: From Theory to Application, (pp. 61–75). Springer.
12.
BluckS.AleaN. (2008). Remembering being me: The self-continuity function of autobiographical memory in younger and older adults. In SaniF. (Ed.), Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 55–70). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888513
13.
BluckS.AleaN. (2011). Crafting the TALE: Construction of a measure to assess the functions of autobiographical remembering. Memory, 19(5), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.590500
DownsV. C.JavidiM. M.NussbaumJ. F. (1988). An analysis of teachers' verbal communication within the college classroom: Use of humor, self‐disclosure, and narratives. Communication Education, 37(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378710
17.
DraperM.PolizziD.SturtevantD.McGrawJ. (2015). Phenomenology of story in dialogue: Narrative as pedagogy in psychology. In BrakkeK.HouskaJ. A. (Eds.), Telling stories: The art and science of storytelling as an instructional strategy (pp. 14–26). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://www.teachpsych.org/ebooks/tellingstories.html
18.
FawcettS. E.FawcettA. M. (2011). The “living” case: Structuring storytelling to increase student interest, interaction, and learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00307.x
19.
FraserB. J. (2011) Classroom environment (Vol. 234). Routledge
20.
GorhamJ. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378702
21.
GraesserA.Hauft-SmithK.CohenA.PylesL. (1980). Advanced outlines, familiarity, and text genre on retention of prose. The Journal of Experimental Education, 48(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1980.11011745
22.
GrobmanH. G. (2015). Antsy students impatient to leave class and faculty captive in NPR driveway moments? Enhancing science classes with personal stories. In BrakkeK.HouskaJ. A. (Eds), Telling stories: The art and science of storytelling as an instructional strategy (pp. 98–115). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://www.teachpsych.org/ebooks/tellingstories.html
23.
GuoP. J.KimJ.RubinR. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videosProceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference (pp. 41–50). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
24.
HarpS. F.MayerR. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
HouskaJ. A.BrakkeK.KinslowS. L.ZhaoX.CampbellB.ClintonA ( (2015). The use of story among teachers of psychology. In BrakkeK.HouskaJ. A. (Eds.), Telling stories: The art and science of storytelling as an instructional strategy (pp. 14–26). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://www.teachpsych.org/ebooks/tellingstories.html
28.
KeehnM. G. (2015). “When you tell a personal story, I kind of perk up a little bit more”: An examination of student learning from listening to personal stories in two social diversity courses. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1056712
29.
KulkofskyS.WangQ.KohJ. B. K. (2009). Functions of memory sharing and mother-child reminiscing behaviors: Individual and cultural variations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(1-2), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370903041231
30.
LandrumR. E.BrakkeK.McCarthyM. A. (2019). The pedagogical power of storytelling. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl00001522
MayerR. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 95–116). Cambridge University Press.
33.
MillerR. L.WozniakW. J. (2015). Weaving yarns into good psychological science education. In BrakkeK.HouskaJ. A. (Eds.), Telling stories: The art and science of storytelling as an instructional strategy (pp. 27–39). Society for the Teaching of Psychology
34.
MutonyiH. (2015). Stories, proverbs, and anecdotes as scaffolds for learning science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 943–971. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.212555
35.
NeisserU. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In GrunebergM. M.MorrisP.SykesR. H. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3–24). Academic Press
36.
NussbaumJ. F.ScottM. D. (1980). Student learning as a relational outcome of teacher-student interaction. Annals of the International Communication Association, 4(1), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1980.11923824
37.
PasupathiM.BillitteriJ. (2015). Being and becoming through being heard: Listener effects on stories and selves. International Journal of Listening, 29(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363
38.
PetersonE. R.RaynerS. G.ArmstrongS. J. (2009). Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future?Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 518–523. https://doi.10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003
39.
PillemerD. B. (1992). Remembering personal circumstances: A functional analysis. In WinogradE.NeisserU. (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories (4th ed., pp. 236–264). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664069.013
40.
PillemerD. B. (2003). Directive functions of autobiographical memory: The guiding power of the specific episode. Memory, 11(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938208
SerraM. J.DunloskyJ. (2010). Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text. Memory, 18(7), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.506441
43.
ShanS.LiC.ShiJ.WangL.CaiH. (2014). Impact of effective communication, achievement sharing and positive classroom environments on learning performance. Systems Research and Behavior Science, 31(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2285
44.
SyedM.AzmitiaM.CooperC. R. (2011). Identity and academic success among underrepresented ethnic minorities: An interdisciplinary review and integration. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01709.x
45.
ViolantiM. T.KellyS. E.GarlandM. E.ChristenS. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Communication Studies, 69(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
46.
WebsterJ. D.McCallM. E. (1999). Reminiscence functions across adulthood: A replication and extension. Identity, 6(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021628525902
