Implementing the Fast Friends Procedure to Build Camaraderie in a Remote Synchronous Teaching Setting

Abstract

Introduction

Improving students’ experiences in courses has always been important; one important method for facilitating discussions is an effective icebreaker activity.

Statement of the Problem

The move to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges for fostering connections among students. Given the constraints in remote learning, teachers need effective and feasible ways to improve student experiences.

Literature Review

We reviewed traditional icebreaker activities and highlighted the potential for implementing the Fast Friends procedure in a remotely delivered synchronous class. This procedure involves a discussion guided by a series of increasingly intimate questions meant to enhance connection between unacquainted people.

Teaching Implications

Undergraduate and graduate students reported having a positive experience and building connections from the procedure, including enhanced classroom motivation. We share materials so interested readers and teachers can easily implement this.

Conclusion

The Fast Friends procedure is a promising icebreaker activity to include at the start of the semester that can help students have a positive experience and build connection with classmates.

Keywords

icebreaker close relationships fast friends procedure student connection COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adedoyin

O. B.

Soykan

(2021). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Aron

Melinat

Aron

E. N.

Vallone

R. D.

Bator

R. J.

(1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003

Arslan

(2021). Loneliness, college belongingness, subjective vitality, and psychological adjustment during coronavirus pandemic: Development of the college belongingness questionnaire. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.240

Chlup

D. T.

Collins

T. E.

(2010). Breaking the ice: Using ice-breakers and re-energizers with adult learners. Adult Learning, 21(3-4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515951002100305

Chronicle contributors (2020, April 10). How will the pandemic change higher education? The Chronicle of higher education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-will-the-pandemic-change-higher-education/

Collins

N. L.

Miller

L. C.

(1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457

Conrad

R. M.

Donaldson

J. A.

(2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. Jossey-Bass.

Daly

Sutin

A. R.

Robinson

(2020). Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720004432

Dixon

Crooks

Henry

(2006). Breaking the ice: Supporting collaboration and the development of community online. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 32(2), 1–17. https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26476

10.

Dressel

D. P.

(2020). Breaking the Ice to build relationships: Using icebreakers to create new relationships, promote emotional safety, and incorporate social and emotional learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(5), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1739434

11.

Ellis

B. J.

Kelley

H. H.

(1999). The pairing game: A classroom demonstration of the matching phenomenon. Teaching of Psychology, 26(2), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2602_8

12.

Hampton

A. J.

Fisher Boyd

A. N.

Sprecher

(2019). You’re like me and I like you: Mediators of the similarity–liking link assessed before and after a getting-acquainted social interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(7), 2221–2244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518790411

13.

Horigian

V. E.

Schmidt

R. D.

Feaster

D. J.

(2021). Loneliness, mental health, and substance use among US young adults during COVID-19. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2020.1836435

14.

Johnson

(2012). Kick-start your class: Academic icebreakers to engage students. Jossey-Bass.

15.

Rossen

(2017). Teaching online: A practical guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427354

16.

Magnan

(2005). Practical tips for using icebreakers with college students (p. 147). Atwood Publishing.

17.

McGrath

Gregory

Farley

Roberts

(2014). Tools of the trade: ‘Breaking the ice’ with virtual tools in online learningRhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. ECU. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/836

18.

Meyers

S. A.

(1997). Increasing student participation and productivity in small-group activities for psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 24(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2402_5

19.

Moon

S. B.

Kim

J. I.

Doh

Y. Y.

Shi

(2013). Smart icebreaker: A workflow for serious game that promotes intimacy among group members. International Conference on Culture and Computing (pp. 145-146). Kyoto, Japan, 16-18 September 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/CultureComputing.2013.38

20.

Nikolova

Lamberton

Coleman

N. V.

(2017). Stranger danger: When and why consumer dyads behave less ethically than individuals. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx108

21.

Oztop

Katsikopoulos

Gummerum

(2018). Creativity through connectedness: The role of closeness and perspective taking in group creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488347

22.

Page-Gould

Mendoza-Denton

Tropp

L. R.

(2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1080–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080

23.

Paykamian

(2021, March 24). Virtual schools to be increasingly common after COVID-19. Government Technology. https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/Virtual-Schools-to-Be-Increasingly-Common-After-COVID-19.html

24.

Perlman

McCann

L. I.

(1999). Student perspectives on the first day of class. Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP260408

25.

Ramirez

Jr. Burgoon

J. K.

(2004). The effect of interactivity on initial interactions: The influence of information valence and modality and information richness on computer‐mediated interaction. Communication Monographs, 71(4), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000307461

26.

Robinson

Ravikulan

Nater

U. M.

Skoluda

Jarrett

Broadbent

(2017). The role of social closeness during tape stripping to facilitate skin barrier recovery: Preliminary findings. Health Psychology, 36(7), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000492

27.

Salmon

(2002). The five-stage framework and e-tivities. Kogan Page.

28.

Sciutto

M. J.

(1995). Student-centered methods for decreasing anxiety and increasing interest level in undergraduate statistics courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(3), 277–280.

29.

Sedikides

Campbell

W. K.

Reeder

G. D.

Elliot

A. J.

(1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378

30.

Sedikides

Campbell

W. K.

Reader

G. D.

Elliot

A. J.

(1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.

31.

Sprecher

(2021a). Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the fast friends procedure: A comparison with a small-talk task and unstructured self-disclosure and the moderating role of mode of communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), 0265407521996055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996055

32.

Sprecher

(2021b). Creating closeness and interdependence: Results of laboratory-based studies involving getting-acquainted dyads. In Machia

L. V.

Agnew

C. R.

Arriaga

X. B.

(Eds.), Interdependence, Interaction, and Close Relationships, Advances in Close Relationships (pp. 342–367). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108645836.

33.

Sprecher

(2021c). The role of expectations for liking and other positive affiliative outcomes in the get-acquainted process that occurs over computer-mediated video communication. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01466-4

34.

West

(1999). The big book of icebreakers: Quick, fun activities for energizing meetings and workshops. McGraw-Hill Education

35.

Worthy

Gary

A. L.

Kahn

G. M.

(1969). Self-disclosure as an exchange process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027990

36.

Wright

B. L.

Sinclair

H. C.

(2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of friend and parent opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships, 19(4), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01390.x

37.

Wright

S. C.

Aron

McLaughlin-Volpe

Ropp

S. A.

(1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73

38.

Zulkifli

C. N.

Idris

M. P.

(2021). An investigation on university students’ perceptions about icebreakers in classrooms. Journal Voice of Academia, 17(1), 10–19. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46510/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB